- Joined
- 6 September 2016
- Posts
- 1,260
- Reactions
- 1,597
Legal action scrutiny will probably be more effective than ASIC. If the compensations fairly due extends to more than the 2.8m for overpayment and 4m for income threshold breaches that the company has set aside then a class action is probably warranted. If 6.8 covers it then participating in the class action will just see some of what would have been paid back to customers anyway end in the lawyers pocket. No surprise the provision got some attention from the lawyers.New risk for TGA unfolding with a potential class action against them by Radio Rentals Customers,
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-03-...g-class-action-over-goods-loan-scheme/8394290
New risk for TGA unfolding with a potential class action against them by Radio Rentals Customers,
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-03-...g-class-action-over-goods-loan-scheme/8394290
New risk for TGA unfolding with a potential class action against them by Radio Rentals Customers,
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-03-...g-class-action-over-goods-loan-scheme/8394290
"She obtained for example a second-hand mattress and bed for $430, and yet she finds after a number of years she's paid over $3,400 for it."
Mr Slade said Ms Simpson kept having money automatically deducted from her account long after contract had ended.
... I still believe the underlying business has merit and will continue to produce profit and reasonable dividends...
The exact same issues concerning TGA were debated on this thread in early 2012. You might find it helpful to review the posts of that period and then see where the share price was about 2 years later. Those who were bullish on TGA then and held it into 2014 saw 100% gains.
Did they sell them then and capitalise or are they now seeing where it has been ?
Ask them. I sold out at $3 plus change.
I can probably guess the answer
Well done exiting at $3
The exact same issues concerning TGA were debated on this thread in early 2012. You might find it helpful to review the posts of that period and then see where the share price was about 2 years later. Those who were bullish on TGA then and held it into 2014 saw 100% gains.
There's a difference between then and now. TGA was nowhere near as leveraged, credit provisioning was far more conservative and it wasn't using all of it's excess funds on a business that has dismal returns on capital (TEF).
Not to mention the Consumer Leasing business margins just got crunched, albeit some of those costs are transient (legal, systems implementation, etc.)
None of this is permanent and none of it will be a permanent drag on TGA's earning power going forward. You don't get to buy an ok business for 7 times forward earnings without some hair on it.
EPS in this case is easily manipulated.
Provisions for impairment were basically flat for the year, yet loan books increased substantially, particularly in a business that has not existed in rough times.
Historically TGA have been good at this, provisioning more than enough... It seems this is no longer so, at least for this financial year.
I can live with all the other hairs, but this particular one is a little too coarse for my liking.
EPS in this case is easily manipulated...
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?