I am looking for a scanner that will just measure the slope of the macdh ie up or down on weekly and monthly charts to estabish a trend and at the same time measure daily for the stochastic 4 1 1 dropping below 30.as a oscillator.
Well Amibroker can code whatever the user can think of so my interpretation is as follows & accompanied by weekly chart signals from 2003 to today for the StochD(4,1,1) below 30 and the MACDH increasing. I used three bars to define an rising MACDH.
Most of the time when MACDH is rising, the StochD(4,1,1) is above 30 (due to the shorter 4 period of measure) so not many signals and not reliable too. Let's see what ASX does from this buy signal today if a buy on open tomorrow (23rd July 2010) is executed. (Note MACDH is falling on the daily)
Whats your thoughts?
Whats your thoughts?
Mumbly jumble I dont understandCanned oscillators are a complete waste of time.
Your attempting to align like oscillators which are all telling the same thing to find the "perfect entry"
As time goes by you'll learn its Support/Resistance/price and time. Volume but for me I'm look for where its NOT!
and price tests which hold the key.
Unfortunately its a road we have all travelled.
Too many conditions is what I think.
Whats your thoughts?
Oh dear.Mumbly jumble I dont understand
Canned Oscillators......using raw data and price for entries and indicators to short list?
Perfection is close to 100% ....realistic is 60-70%
Would u mind sharing with us what company u are a director in?
Would it be share trading by any chance?
Great advise
Wish u all the best
But by all means go for it, do the same things 90% of us do, fine by me
Mumbly jumble I dont understand
Canned Oscillators......using raw data and price for entries and indicators to short list?
Perfection is close to 100% ....realistic is 60-70%
Would u mind sharing with us what company u are a director in?
Would it be share trading by any chance?
yet whats the going failure rate? 90% last time I checked.
if you're a scamming blood-sucker thats creating another super-mega-profitable system and going to sell it for $4999 with 50% off, only to the next 125 callers, then go for it, you're on the right track!
Would that be similiar to a volumn based charting programme I found on the internet with pink in the vol area? Think that was around $5grand.!
I am a private technical trader for 3 yrs now with my TAB now plus or minus 2-4 % my standard entries are: Break of resistance and support levels with no indicators. 45 odd over 3 years on weekly and daily charts so I am not big time trader on here unlike others on here. But I am trading my own money in the real market.
Glad I switched from fundamentals (buy and hope) to technicals just before the GFC....I am not whinging.
But as I try to evolve and improve by reading and testing systems every now and again I do test out indicators.....like devergence a worthwhile stop management tool?? But not for entries?
I was merely testing out Dr Elders ideas from one of his books ...all free stuff! XAO is still going up based on Dr Elders writings or is that Random Walking?
Reading the responces appears this may not be the place for open interchange of ideas.
Arrogance. And idiocy. I provided an example of a profitable trader using this strategy, but the mods deleted it because it referenced Nick Radge. Do you think pro traders bothers quantifying momentum using some arcane concept that nobody understand? NO. They almost certainly plot daily and weekly momentum using a MACD or a 5/34 oscillator like the AdvancedGET one or any other useful Mom oscillator. I promise you, there is no secret to quantifying past mom especially on higher timeframes. All you need is a MACD. MACD is perfect for quantifying past momentum.You would soon realise it too if you thought about it for half a second, everyone does the same thing as what you are trying to do, all the wonderful indicators trying to get the perfect entry, yet whats the going failure rate? 90% last time I checked.
You guys acted like assholes to hotqld, and should be ashamed of yourselves.Reading the responces appears this may not be the place for open interchange of ideas.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?