Good luck COZ holders (any other posts and views are welcome of course!)...
Hi Skc, you are correct that COZ buziness does revolve a lot around the newly imposed carbon tax, but it does derive a number of its deals through government instrumentalities that seek a new clean energy future and encourage industry to provide for such a future with incentives (and penalties!).
The comparison with the likes of Timbercorp etc that you mention is not a good comparison and unfair, actually puts a slur on COZ that shouldn't be there since it is providing for a complete gamut of carbon businesses related to carbon sequestration, environmental management of industrial and mining sites, consulting etc, as well as providing a means for the selling of carbon credits both for the bigger investor and the retail joe public.
COZ didn't react to the CCF announcement yesterday and it surprised me, and actually was off a cent with a small trade at 15 cents. I expect that COZ will start moving higher in the coming months once the market realises its likely huge deal flow with the carbon tax liabilities looming for Australia's 500 major carbon dioxide emitters!
COZ on the other hand has a considerable cash reserve, for not I'm not sure of, but certainly it doesn't have a need for more capital with the model it employs. I do suggest that if both go well then CCF will have the potential to move considerably higher due to the lower shares on issue and the lower admin overheads, whereas COZ has the safety of a large cash reserve and considerable in-house knowledge re all facets of the carbon trading and associated consulting requirements. My view is that COZ will be a safer bet - if CCF for instance can't raise cash easily then it could be left behind or could face a cash shortage when its required to sustain or grow the business.
Skc, you are of course stating the same issue as Sumh, re lack of clarity re the carbon business model. I believe the issue that both COZ and CCF face are trying to maintain confidentiality whilst they build their business at this very important initial stage of their developments with the new legislative due to be enacted from July 1 this year. But as regards to annual allocation of their contracts I believe that they negotiate fairly long period into each transaction of say no less then 10 - 15 - 20 years, bearing in mind the fact that new forests only start to produce the carbon credits in about year 3.
And our mate Tony Abbott, ala Mr No, is confusing the business landscape by vowing to rescind the legislation if elected. Of course its doubtful he could ever do so since the Greens will inevitably hold the power in the Senate, and anyways Mr No probably doesn't want to remove the tax, but just look like he wants to remove it! Thats politicians for you, at the end of the day they don't give a damn apart from their own egos!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?