I contend that todays sellers of SDL are in the "greedy" category and have a high chance of missing out when the real action comes. Ahhh.. let them chase their tails, at least they'll be happy thinking they're making money.
Indeed, I thought that the "Thought Police" and "Forum Gestapo" were extinct.
people, no need for chipping each other.
SDL hit a new high again today (off the bottom I mean). The trend is definitely north at the moment.
Also, volumes continue to be very high. A lot of interest.
I continue to hold my reasonable holding and have finally broken through my average price of 16.9 cents (I bought originally at 45 cents and averaged all the way down over the last 18 months).
50 cents then $1 IMO are the next milestone SP targets upon a partner/finance announcemet in 3rd or 4rth QTR 2009.
Do you mind giving us the details on these price targets LRG.50 cents then $1 IMO are the next milestone SP targets upon a partner/finance announcemet in 3rd or 4rth QTR 2009.
PPS. SDL looking bullish with recent Morning Star and increasing volume (my tech input)
"Hi Fureien
Morningstar is an independent managed fund and share researcher.
http://www.morningstar.com.au"
Introduction of Strategic Partners/Investors
Work will continue to focus on negotiations with these parties in the September 2009 Quarter and the Company remains confident of successfully concluding arrangements for the introduction of prospective strategic partners/investors to the Project.
From QR..
I note that there is no timeline mentioned. I had thought that there would be some decision in this regard during September, but it may well be later than that.
The Mbalam convention will not be finalised till "The Feasibility Study will form the basis for negotiation of the fiscal and commercial terms of the Convention with the final Bankable Feasibility Study (“BFS”) to be completed in 2010 on the basis of these terms."
So that is at least a year away. No wonder fureien that you are seeing some weakness.
There is really no good reason to suspect that the SP will increase prior to an anouncement regarding Offtake/Financing is there?
Could it be that we holders must now languish a little longer?
Bit-o-berley to entice some comment.
Note the wording here Carbon - it states that the BFS will be completed in 2010 on the basis of the terms in the Convention - I read this to mean that the Convention will be finalised prior to the BFS? Maybe worth clarifying with the co?
Sir,
I hold SDL shares, and I have some questions relating to that holding.
With regard to the "Bankable Feasibility Study".
Will this need to be complete prior to the Mbalam Convention being ratified by both parties?
If this is so, then will the Cameroon Government (if they decide to opt in) pitch in their money and take their shares at this point?
At this point in time, how much would the Cameroon Government need to pitch in to satisfy the arrangement?
Clarification would be greatly appreciated.
exactly u like me i will continue to hold for the good news.everybody holding this stock is scared of missing the gravy train hence the stock holding up. still see more downside as time goes on as nervs get the best of some but a lot of diehards holding imoUpdate.
Received "Read Receipt" from my email to SDL but no answer. (See previous post for content)
Seems like there is buying in any weakness, I fully expected us to be at 17.5 or lower, but it has held well at 18.0 (For the benefit of those forum rules lovers)... I think this is because:
1. There is really no new good news.
2. It may be a while before there is some new good news.
3. I would have thought that the "traders" would have opted for greener pastures (as there are probably share price fluctuations with a wider swing elsewhere) and deserted us.
For the record. I hold SDL and will continue to do so for the forseeable future.
SDL has finished at 0.205c.
It went for a good run in the last week.
I am a SDL shareholder and proud of it.
EPS = .25$ -> PE retio (in USD) = 0.68
let assume in production PE retion in area 10 (think not to much)
it leasd us to .25*10/(.68) = 3.67$ price per share (in USD).
3.67 * 1.2(echange rate) give us 4.4 AUD/share.
This is my target price
THE proposed six-week trial for Ken Talbot, who's accused of paying Gordon Nuttall almost $300,000 in corrupt payments, will not start for at least a year.
Lawyers for the former Macarthur Coal chief today successfully argued his trial be listed for the latter part of 2010.
Barrister Martin Burns, SC, asked Brisbane District Court chief judge Patsy Wolfe to set a trial date well after the proposed March 2010 trial of businessman Harold Shand - who is accused of paying Nuttall a one-off corrupt payment of $60,000.
Talbot, 58, is charged with 35 counts of corruptly paying valuable considerations to influence favour in relation to principal affairs or business.
It is expected the Crown will allege Talbot, one of Australia's richest men, made 34 corrupt payments of $8333.33 to Nuttall and one of $16,666.66, between October 24, 2002, and September 28, 2005.
Nuttall, 56, was jailed for six years in July after a jury convicted him of 36 counts of receiving corrupt payments.
Earlier this month, Judge Milton Griffin, SC, adjourned Shand's trial for six months because of adverse media publicity.
Tony Glynn, SC, for Shand, said there was a real risk the publicity surrounding Nuttall's conviction had been further charged by statements made by the state's most well-known corruption fighter and former Queensland judge Tony Fitzgerald.
He said while Mr Fitzgerald's comments about corruption in Queensland did not directly relate to Mr Shand, it had ``inflamed'' the situation.
Mr Glynn said there seemed to be a general opinion because Nuttall had been convicted of receiving a payment from Mr Shand that Mr Shand was also guilty.
``That is not the law,'' Mr Glynn said.
``(To adjourn for six months) would not only be giving a fairer trial, it would give the perception of a fairer trial.''
Shand's trial has been listed to commence March 8 next year.
Mr Burn, for Talbot, today argued a similar delay in time should be granted to his client in the event media coverage of Shand's trial, which will again detail Nuttall's involvement, is as detailed as that of the now disgraced MP.
Prosecutor Ross Martin, SC, who appeared via a telephone hook-up, said he did not expect Shand's trial to receive the level of media coverage as the Nuttall trial did.
However, Mr Martin did not oppose judge Wolfe's suggestion a trial could be listed for August.
Judge Wolfe did voice concerns about the proposed length of the trial, Nuttall's went for three weeks, when Mr Burns requested six weeks be set aside.
Mr Burns, when pressed by judge Wolfe, said Talbot's trial barrister, Bob Mulholland, QC, had instructed him the trial could go as long as six weeks.
Judge Wolfe has scheduled the trial to commence on August 30 next year.
Talbot did not attend today's hearing.
sorry dont understand any of this. 200 day moving average was crossed ages ago and i am learning technical stuff on the run. is this normal jargon for trader buffs or can somebody explain in simple terms plsTechnical signals, in one day
1.Price Crosses Moving Average (200-week)
2.Commodity Channel Index
3.Momentum
4.MACD
and of course still.....big fundamental perspectives.
1. 2.45 Bln @32%
2. 0.30 Bln @64%
in price @75$ per 100% equivalent it is 77 bln$ resources.
let assume 30 mln T 100% equvalent @ 75 FOB
=2250 mln$ /year
Pre production 3.3 bln$ -> c.a. - 660 mln$ year capital cost
- 590 mln$ operation (19.65$/T)
- 295 mln$ amortyzator
------------------------------
705 mln$ yearly
75% = 529 mln$
from other hand 2.1 bln outstanding shares.
EPS = .25$ -> PE retio (in USD) = 0.68
let assume in production PE retion in area 10 (think not to much)
it leasd us to .25*10/(.68) = 3.67$ price per share (in USD).
3.67 * 1.2(echange rate) give us 4.4 AUD/share.
This is my target price
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?