- Joined
- 26 March 2014
- Posts
- 19,680
- Reactions
- 11,989
So what?
So it means that traditional marriage and same sex unions are different things and should be dealt with separately.
So what?
traditional marriage and same sex unions are different things and should be dealt with separately.
Why though?
they aren't that different, they can be easily be dealt with the same.
Because a lot of people are getting sick of a minority pushing the majority around.
It would also solve the question of religious freedom. Churches could choose only to perform marriages under the Marriage Act, other celebrants could choose either or both. Everyone should be happy.
So when blacks protested against being forced to seat in the back of the bus, was that the "minority pushing the majority around",
Pretty weak reasons to me.
Yes but part of that is not denying rights to others, I thought I had explained that already.I thought you were a great supporter of religious freedom ?
Under a separate act, SS couples would have the same rights under the law as straight couples.
Yes but part of that is not denying rights to others, I thought I had explained that already.
So why have two acts???
LGBTI's will have the same rights as others to have their partnerships recognised in Law.
Gays are perhaps 1-2% of the Aussie population. Those who would actually want to get married, at best, perhaps half of that.So when blacks protested against being forced to seat in the back of the bus, was that the "minority pushing the majority around",
Was it enough to say, "well the blacks still get to ride the bus, and go to all the same places, so they have nothing to winge about"
Pretty weak reasons to me.
no one has shown a single way same sex marriage causes harm
Except they won't have the right to marriage.
'' Dad why are those two men Kissing?
Because they are attracted to each other.
Its totally normal Nigel --- You know Uncle Gary, well Daddy went out with him
before I married your mother.
The coalition were elected on many promises they have broken, not sure why this one matters so much. But I never really like that argument anyway, I support SSM but it's low down on my priorities that dictate my vote, I'm sure many others are the same.Overhang, where is you evidence for that?
The Coalition were elected on the promise of a plebiscite. That's clear evidence.
In a clear sign a plebiscite would pass the legalisation of same-sex marriage, a Fairfax Ipsos poll of 1377 voters on Sunday night to Wednesday night found 70 per cent of people supported legalised same-sex marriage
http://www.afr.com/news/politics/el...iage-plebiscite-20160701-gpwg3z#ixzz4qMjn102z
An SMS Morgan Poll shows a clear majority of Australians (76%) say gay people should have the right to get married in Australia while only 24% say they should not. This special SMS Morgan Poll was conducted last week, February 25-26, 2016 with a cross-section of 1,572 Australians.
http://www.roymorgan.com/findings/6...gay-marriage-february-march-2016-201607191635
The poll, conducted for The Australian less than a month out from the postal plebiscite, shows 63 per cent of Australians are planning to vote ‘Yes’.
http://www.news.com.au/national/pol...s/news-story/933f730174ea69a3a2b51bc60b5fb77f
So it means that traditional marriage and same sex unions are different things and should be dealt with separately.
I hope the majority of Australians don't support your opinion on that.
Because the no vote would winWhy ?
Hello and welcome to Aussie Stock Forums!
To gain full access you must register. Registration is free and takes only a few seconds to complete.
Already a member? Log in here.