- Joined
- 26 March 2014
- Posts
- 19,674
- Reactions
- 11,979
The "control of behaviour" is a very important and noteworthy issue.
Control of behaviour according to mysticism and religious dogma is OK ?
The "control of behaviour" is a very important and noteworthy issue.
In order to answer your question, I require more specificity.Control of behaviour according to mysticism and religious dogma is OK ?
In order to answer your question, I require more specificity.
Are you asking about all religious dogmas, or only a specific subset?
Are you asking about all manifestastions of behaviour control,(i.e. external, internal, voluntary, involuntary) ?
If not, to which manifestation/s does your enquiry pertain?
Over the years, I have known a few Muslims, and many Christians.Lets just say continued membership of and allegiance to a particular mass religion like Islam or Christianity.
when I encountered some practitioners whom had somehow managed to delude themselves into believing that they had the right to impose their chosen religion upon others.
My understanding of healthy parents is, that they will generally operate in accordance with their beliefs, about those things that they perceive to be most beneficial for the children they raise.That seems to be the practise of most parents with strong religious beliefs.
My understanding of healthy parents is, that they will generally operate in accordance with their beliefs, about those things that they perceive to be most beneficial for the children they raise.
Are you contesting their right to do so?
I ask again, are you contesting their right to do so?You think parents have the right to decide who their children will marry ?
I ask again, are you contesting their right to do so?
If so, how is that not tantamount to imposing your dogma upon others?
Not at all! What I am contesting, is your presumption to having the right, to tell other families, that you know better than they, how their children ought, or ought not, be raised.Of course I'm contesting a parents right to decide who their children will marry.
Aren't you ?
Not at all! What I am contesting, is your presumption to having the right, to tell other families, that you know better than they, how their children ought, or ought not, be raised.
Before moving onto the opening of that particular tin of worms, do you think you could maybe find the time to answer the last couple of questions I posed to yourself?When it comes to fundamental matters of human rights the law of the land dictates what parents can or can't do as far as their children are concerned.
Do you object to that ?
Do you believe that those institutions, easing the burden on public facilities, are not entitled to some recompense, in recognition of their contribution to our society?Secondly if parents want to send their children to a religious school, fine as long as they pay for it themselves.
Before moving onto the opening of that particular tin of worms, do you think you could maybe find the time to answer the last couple of questions I posed to yourself?
Do you believe that those institutions, easing the burden on public facilities, are not entitled to some recompense, in recognition of their contribution to our society?
Where in this thread may I find your answers to the following?:I have answered your questions. If you fail to interpret my answers to your satisfaction that is not my problem.
...
If so, how is that not tantamount to imposing your dogma upon others?
...
Whose children are we talking about, and who is ultimately accountable for the welfare of those children, the parents or Sir Rumpole?
...
By educating their children are they easing the burden on the public school system?Scientology is classified as a religion in Australia. Should we pay them for educating children ?
By educating their children are they easing the burden on the public school system?
If so, then by what right can anyone begrudge them some recompense?
How is your expressed sentiment, not tantamount to the promotion of:We expect children to be educated with evidence and critical thinking, not voodoo, prejudice and mysticism.
Control of behaviour according to mysticism and religious dogma...
How is your expressed sentiment, not tantamount to the promotion of:
No! I am equating your opinion of truth/reality with dogma!What ? You are equating evidence to dogma ?
This is a question that you really need to be directing to yourself.Do you know the difference ?
Hello and welcome to Aussie Stock Forums!
To gain full access you must register. Registration is free and takes only a few seconds to complete.
Already a member? Log in here.