Tisme
Apathetic at Best
- Joined
- 27 August 2014
- Posts
- 8,954
- Reactions
- 1,152
Quite possibly, I mean I can't see any reason those relations should be banned. and if they are banned, it should be based on rational real world arguments, not a persons religion.
Of course the religious are free to make and live by what ever rules they like, but they have no right to try and make people who aren't in their cult obey those rules.
Just watched a couple of minutes, of the Sydney gay mardi gra, from the positive ramping by the commentators I would guess gay tourism will go through the roof. lol
Jeez the way they were talking it up, I was thinking, I'm missing out.
Used to be stacked with friends and family to swell the numbers. Now it's the in thing I'm wondering what the real split is.
People buy tickets to freak shows in circuses too.
Not sure we should be celebrating people with a screw loose, it is kinda court jester stuff and emblematic of a human need for theatre.
I think it's basically immaturity and insecurity.
Those who are happy heterosexuals don't feel the need to revel in such and ram it down other people's throats. .
Are you sure about that, there is plenty of heterosexual Mardi Gras and other celebrations are the world.
And I think those people are immature and insecure as well.
Those who are happy heterosexuals don't feel the need to revel in such and ram it down other people's throats.
I don't really see a difference.
So you think the Mardi Gras is a parade of the immature and insecure ?
We are not all perfect specimens like you.Not sure we should be celebrating people with a screw loose, it is kinda court jester stuff and emblematic of a human need for theatre.
Should we have a parade for down syndromers too?
I would much rather that than a culture that celebrates sexual repression.
??? Where did I say that, there videos I put up are heterosexual people.Are you saying heterosexuality is sexual repression ?
But there has to be some sexual repression, there has to be a line somewhere.
We ask, nay, demand under penalty of prosecution that pedophiles supress their sexuality.
We teach that there be no sex between family members and is illegal.
The #metoo movement asks that a wholw gender repress their sexuality.
Dammit, I'd like to pork about half of my clientele, but I have to suppress that under implicit threat of divorce.
Some peoples sexuality include animals ferchrissake... The law demands that be suppressed too.
We know that line has shifted recently with regards to homosexuality. Yet that arbitrary line of sexual repression remains.
Or is #loveislove?
We are not all perfect specimens like you.
.
n?Yes there has been sexual repression for a long time, and in the case of the church it created pedophiles, I didn’t say there isn’t sexual repression, I said I prefer not to repress people’s sexuality.
Me too, is not sexual repression.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?