Australian (ASX) Stock Market Forum

Same sex marriage - Yes or No?

Same sex marriage - Yes or No?

  • Yes

    Votes: 77 55.8%
  • No

    Votes: 61 44.2%

  • Total voters
    138
Quite possibly, I mean I can't see any reason those relations should be banned. and if they are banned, it should be based on rational real world arguments, not a persons religion.

Of course the religious are free to make and live by what ever rules they like, but they have no right to try and make people who aren't in their cult obey those rules.


So those of us who object to the secular religious orthodoxy of social justice should continue to put in the good fight.

We should resist those who worship the false Gods who supposedly fight against homophobia, racism, sexism, uniquity and national pride.
 
Just watched a couple of minutes, of the Sydney gay mardi gra, from the positive ramping by the commentators I would guess gay tourism will go through the roof. lol
Jeez the way they were talking it up, I was thinking, I'm missing out.
 
Just watched a couple of minutes, of the Sydney gay mardi gra, from the positive ramping by the commentators I would guess gay tourism will go through the roof. lol
Jeez the way they were talking it up, I was thinking, I'm missing out.

Used to be stacked with friends and family to swell the numbers. Now it's the in thing I'm wondering what the real split is.
 
People buy tickets to freak shows in circuses too.

Yes, but still found myself looking away from the ambush marketing masquerading as news.

Hard to watch sleaze when you have a natural aversion to it and zip inclination to deny a strong innate sense of natural physiological construction and purpose.

Not sure we should be celebrating people with a screw loose, it is kinda court jester stuff and emblematic of a human need for theatre.

Should we have a parade for down syndromers too?
 
Not sure we should be celebrating people with a screw loose, it is kinda court jester stuff and emblematic of a human need for theatre.

I think it's basically immaturity and insecurity.

Those who are happy heterosexuals don't feel the need to revel in such and ram it down other people's throats. (in a manner of speaking :D).
 
I think it's basically immaturity and insecurity.

Those who are happy heterosexuals don't feel the need to revel in such and ram it down other people's throats. .

Are you sure about that, there is plenty of heterosexual Mardi Gras and other celebrations are the world.



 
So you think the Mardi Gras is a parade of the immature and insecure ?

I didn't comment at all on your first paragraph, I was only referencing your second paragraph.

I think all the different versions of Mardi Gras and carnival are just about having fun, celebrating sexuality, I would much rather that than a culture that celebrates sexual repression.

Whether they are mainly attended by people who are immature and insecure I don't know, and I don't think it matters.
 
Not sure we should be celebrating people with a screw loose, it is kinda court jester stuff and emblematic of a human need for theatre.

Should we have a parade for down syndromers too?
We are not all perfect specimens like you.

I am all for a down syndrome parade if it makes them feel more included.
 
Are you saying heterosexuality is sexual repression ?
??? Where did I say that, there videos I put up are heterosexual people.


I said Mardi Gras and carnival in all there forms, are a celebration of sexuality and I would rather that than sexual repression, most Mardi Gras are heterosexual people celebrating.

Live and let live bud, it’s not hurting anyone.
 
But there has to be some sexual repression, there has to be a line somewhere.

We ask, nay, demand under penalty of prosecution that pedophiles supress their sexuality.

We teach that there be no sex between family members and is illegal.

The #metoo movement asks that a wholw gender repress their sexuality.

Dammit, I'd like to pork about half of my clientele, but I have to suppress that under implicit threat of divorce.

Some peoples sexuality include animals ferchrissake... The law demands that be suppressed too.

We know that line has shifted recently with regards to homosexuality. Yet that arbitrary line of sexual repression remains.

Or is #loveislove?
 
But there has to be some sexual repression, there has to be a line somewhere.

We ask, nay, demand under penalty of prosecution that pedophiles supress their sexuality.

We teach that there be no sex between family members and is illegal.

The #metoo movement asks that a wholw gender repress their sexuality.

Dammit, I'd like to pork about half of my clientele, but I have to suppress that under implicit threat of divorce.

Some peoples sexuality include animals ferchrissake... The law demands that be suppressed too.

We know that line has shifted recently with regards to homosexuality. Yet that arbitrary line of sexual repression remains.

Or is #loveislove?

Yes there has been sexual repression for a long time, and in the case of the church it created pedophiles, I didn’t say there isn’t sexual repression, I said I prefer not to repress people’s sexuality.

Me too, is not sexual repression.
 
We are not all perfect specimens like you.
.

I think you have patently established yourself as a walking truth of that a few times before.

I believe there is also a cure around the corner for hate fueled congenital caustic sarcasm (HFCCS), trying to masquerade as intelligence.:rolleyes:
 
Yes there has been sexual repression for a long time, and in the case of the church it created pedophiles, I didn’t say there isn’t sexual repression, I said I prefer not to repress people’s sexuality.

Me too, is not sexual repression.
n?
You saying pedophilia is a church invention? That's a joke right? Who created gays then?
 
Top