Australian (ASX) Stock Market Forum

Russian stock market opens March 24 2022 first time since start of war


The ruble-based MOEX Russia Index erased early gains and closed 0.5% down at 2,130 on Wednesday, extending its losing streak to three sessions as investors digested a batch of macroeconomic data and fresh sanctions from the US.

Miners and metallurgists closed sharply in the red after the US included steel producing giant MMK and its chairman into its list of fresh sanctions, pressuring shares to plunge nearly 10%.

Rusal, Severstal, and Polyus tracked the lower confidence in the sector and declined more than 3%.

On the other hand, the financial sector closed slightly higher, carried by a 1.5% jump for TCS Group.

On the data front, PMI reports showed that activity in the Russian services sector expanded for the second consecutive period and at its fastest pace in 13 months.

1659566052528.png
 

The ruble-based MOEX Russia index erased earlier gains to close at 2,117 on Thursday, extending its losing streak to four sessions amid pressure from the utilities and energy sectors.

Rosseti and Inter RAO both lost over 4% to lead the losses among the power grid operators in Moscow.

Also, Gazprom shares closed over 1% down after it stated that sanctions from Canada, the EU, and the UK make it impossible for the Siemens turbine to be returned to the Nord Stream I pipeline, citing the measures as the reason for capacity cuts in flows to Germany.

Also, metallurgists dropped sharply after the Ministry of Industry and Trade said it expects a decrease in demand for steel.

On the other hand, tech stocks outperformed the broader index following Kommersant's report that the government allocated RUB 130 billion for loans to Yandex, VK, and Ozon to help them fulfill Eurobond obligations.

1659651545451.png
 

The ruble-based MOEX Russia Index plunged on later trading and closed 2.8% down at 2,057 on Friday, the second lowest close since 2017 after the Moscow Exchange announced that foreign investors from “friendly” countries will be allowed to buy and sell Russian equities starting next week.

The measures are expected to increase volatility as foreign investors have been unable to sell Russian equity since authorities banned them from markets after Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.

Tech stocks took the biggest losses, with Yandex and Softline shares plummeting 8.2% and 6.9%, respectively. Retailers were also sharply in the red, led by a 7.5% decline for O’Key.

In the meantime, Gazprom stocks trailed 4.5% as investors continue to monitor the increasingly low likelihood that capacity at the Nord Stream I pipeline will return to normal levels.

12 Month Chart MOEX

1659736093006.png


1659736134568.png
 

The ruble-based MOEX Russia index closed 1.7% higher at 2,090 on Monday, as the Moscow Exchange postponed the opening of the equity market to foreign investors from “friendly” countries.

Gains in Moscow were spread among all sectors, with oil giants Lukoil and Rosneft both adding more than 1%, while blue chips in the financial sector were led by a 1.7% rise for Sberbank.

On the other hand, Rusagro dropped 0.7% after the publication of its Q2 financial results.

The announcement of allowing some foreign investors to resume trading of Russian equities triggered a sell-off with Friday's session marking the second-lowest close since 2017.

1659998319706.png
 

The MOEX Russia index erased early losses to surge 2.3% and close at 2,135 on Tuesday, spurred by the rebound in crude prices as investors continued to monitor and speculate on the re-entry of some foreign investors to the equity market.

The central bank announced measures to allow some foreign investors from “friendly” countries to participate in the derivatives market if its sole reason is to benefit Russian individuals and institutions, but kept equities off-limits.

Energy stocks were the top gainers, sharply outperforming the broader index with a near 8% gain for Tatneft after authorities shut off oil flows to Europe via the Druzhba pipeline.

Expectations last week that some foreign investors would be able to access the Russian equity market led to a sharp sell-off that saw the MOEX close near 2017-lows, driving authorities to delay the re-opening.

1660083239342.png
 

The ruble-based MOEX Russia Index erased early losses and closed 0.7% higher at 2,150 on Wednesday, notching its third session in the green with support from energy and tech stocks as investors awaited domestic inflation figures to be released shortly after the closing bell.

Tatneft shares jumped over 3% and led the oil sector higher as flows to Central Europe via the Druzhba pipeline resumed after Hungarian MOL settled the transit fees.

Support for the company was also due to the announcement that its board of directors will meet to decide on dividends next week.

On the other hand steel producing giants Severstal, NLMK, and Mechel were all down over 1%.

The MOEX rose nearly 100 points since Friday’s plunge, brought by the since postponed announcement that foreign investors would be allowed in the Russia equity market again.

1660171072392.png
 

The ruble-based MOEX Russia Index erased earlier gains and closed nearly 1% down at 2,130, halting three consecutive sessions in the green brought down by energy and tech shares.

Energy shares booked the sharpest losses of the session, led by a 2.6% Gazprom decline while Transneft erased yesterday’s gain as investors continued to monitor oil flows through the Druzhba pipeline after Hungary’s MOL settled the transit bill.

Also, the looser monetary policy failed to support the tech sector, with Yandex nearly dropping 3%.

In the meantime, fresh CPI figures showed the inflation rate decelerated to 15.3%, the lowest since entering double-digit territory in March.

1660258368188.png
 

The ruble-based MOEX Russia index gained 0.7% to close at 2,150 on Friday, notching a 4.7% percent weekly gain after the Moscow Exchange postponed the decision to authorize foreign traders to return to the equity market.

Investors also awaited the release of GDP figures for the second quarter, set to highlight the impact of Western sanctions on the Russian economy since its invasion of Ukraine.

The financial sector closed sharply in the green, led by a near 4% jump for TCS Group and a 1% advance for Sberbank.

The energy sector was also among the largest gainers in the session, led by a 2% upturn for Tatneft. Transneft shares also rose, extending the positive momentum since oil flows in the Druzhba pipeline to Central Europe restarted.

Previous expectations that investors from foreign countries would be allowed to sell their positions for the first time since February 24th spurred a sell-off that lowered the index into its second lowest close since 2017 last week.

1660346906716.png


12 Month MOEX Chart
1660346954532.png


1660347006863.png
 

The ruble-based MOEX Russia index closed 0.8% higher at 2,165 on Monday, the highest in two weeks as investors continued to examine market developments for major Russian commodity exports and digested fresh GDP figures from after Friday’s market close.

The Russian economy contracted 4% year-on-year in the second quarter but beat the Central Bank of Russia’s expectations of a 4.3% decline.

Still, the central bank expects the effects of Western sanctions to hit harder on the third quarter, as the economy is seen contracting 7%. Miners and metallurgists erased early losses and were among the leaders of the session, with Rusal and MMK adding 5.5% and 3.6%, respectively.

On the other hand, heavyweight energy stocks largely underperformed the broader index, as poor industrial activity data from major importer China weighed on demand expectations.

Lukoil and Transneft both closed below the flatline, while Tatneft shares fell 2.3% ahead of its board’s decision on dividend payments.

1660602295822.png
 

The ruble-based MOEX Russia Index jumped 2% to close at 2,208 on Tuesday, extending yesterday’s gains to the highest in over two weeks with strong support from the heavyweight energy sector, miners, and banks.

Gazprom and Novatek added 3.7% and 3.1%, respectively, tracking the surge in European natural gas prices amid soaring temperatures and poor logistics for transport of fossil fuels.

Recent support for gas prices compounded the large supply cuts from Gazprom, which faced skepticism from Western leaders after citing turbine problems as the reason for supply woes.

In the meantime, Tatneft shares surged 5% after its board of directors recommended dividend payments of RUB 32.71 per share.

Elsewhere, investors continued to digest Q2 GDP readings and central bank forecasts to gauge the extent of the decline in Russia’s economy following its invasion of Ukraine.

Fresh data pointed to an annual 4% decline in the GDP during Q2, while the CBR forecasts a 7% drop in Q3.

1660688634880.png
 

The ruble-based MOEX Russia Index closed 0.9% lower at 2,190, halting three consecutive sessions in the green and partially erasing this week’s rally amid losses for Russia’s heavyweight commodity-backed stocks.

The downturn in prices for bullion, base metals, and other minerals drove miners and metallurgists traded in Moscow to drop sharply, with Severstal trailing 1.6%.

On top of that, Mechel shares plunged 7% after the mining and metalwork giant refused to divulge quarterly results.

Energy stocks were also in the red, with Gazprom down 2.6% after yesterday’s natural gas price surge.

Oil service providers Lukoil, Rosneft, and Tatneft also closed in the red.

According to vessel movement data from Bloomberg, seaborne oil exports to Asia have already started to ease after discounted prices following the war led to a spike in shipments to China and India.

In the meantime, sales to Europe also progressively wain ahead of EU’s oil embargo starting in December.

1660775418671.png
 

The ruble-based MOEX Russia Index closed a choppy session slightly higher at 2,195 on Thursday, as sharp gains for the financial sector offset losses for miners and consumer staples, while investors continued to assess volatile energy markets and their impact in Russia’s economy.

Bank of Saint Petersburg shares surged nearly 8% after the lender announced it will pay dividends on the first half of the year, while Sberbank added 1.5%.

At the same time, Gazprom stocks advanced 1.5% with support from surging energy prices in Europe.

On the other hand, miners and metallurgists tracked the downturn for base metals and bullion prices this week and booked losses, led by a 2% decline for Polymetal, while NorNickel and MMK fell 1%.

On the data front, Russian producer prices fell sharply month-on-month for the second consecutive period in July, adding to bets that the CBR may continue to slash rates in its next meeting.

1660862692943.png
 

The ruble based MOEX Russia Index pared early losses and closed marginally above the flatline at 2,195 on Friday, as investors continued to monitor energy markets and how they may affect the Russian economic outlook.

Banks led the gains in the session and closed over 2% higher on average, led by an 8% surge for TCS Group, still benefiting from the statement by the CBR that Russia’s banking sector needs not systemic additional capitalization.

At the same time, stronger grain supplies continued to support Russian fertilizers, with Phosagro also having support from strong quarterly results.

On the other hand, recession concerns in Europe pressured demand for natural gas companies Gazprom and Novatek, easing from the rally this week amid soaring TTF gas prices.

Also, MTS stocks dropped nearly 1% following quarterly reports pointing to a 36% decrease in net income.

On the week, the Moscow Exchange’s benchmark index added 2.2%.

1660949045253.png


MOEX 12 Month Chart
1660949006635.png

1660949089579.png
 
A country that loses its youth and educated is a country destined to stagnate.

"Nobody knows exactly how many people have left Russia since the start of the war. Estimates vary from 150,000 to 300,000. It is not just the numbers that matter, but who the émigrés are. Like those crammed into the Vakke apartment, the diaspora consists largely of young, well-educated, politically conscious, active, articulate and resourceful people—in other words, Russia’s intellectual elite. The exiles have taken with them their habits, their networks, their ability to self-organise and their values. That will have profound effects on both the country they have left behind and the countries they have settled in."

Much of Russia’s intellectual elite has fled the country
That will have dramatic effects on both Russia and on the exiles themselves

On a recent warm and breezy Saturday night a few dozen Russians—mostly in their 20s and 30s—crammed into a small Soviet-era apartment in Vakke, a well-heeled part of Tbilisi, Georgia’s capital and, for now at least, their new home. While thousands of their compatriots were enjoying Georgian food and wine in street cafés and Russian-speaking bars, they huddled around a projector, holding what they described as a “home conference”.

Émigré hangouts can be depressing places. This one exuded intellectual energy. The event was well structured, attendees were well behaved, and there was almost no drinking. Over the course of two hours a dozen speakers talked about their past and present pursuits. Their subjects ranged from the “pathology of propaganda” and cleaning up the streets of Tbilisi to recycling, driverless cars and helping people with psychological trauma. In the interval, they sampled home-made snacks, including vegan, gluten-free cake (5 lari—$1.85—a piece). In both form and content, the conference was a snapshot of a country that the attendees wished to live in, and which was now separate from the place they once called home.

Nobody knows exactly how many people have left Russia since the start of the war. Estimates vary from 150,000 to 300,000. About 50,000 are thought to have settled in Georgia, an influx large and sudden enough to push up local rents. It is not just the numbers that matter, but who the émigrés are. Like those crammed into the Vakke apartment, the diaspora consists largely of young, well-educated, politically conscious, active, articulate and resourceful people—in other words, Russia’s intellectual elite. The exiles have taken with them their habits, their networks, their ability to self-organise and their values. That will have profound effects on both the country they have left behind and the countries they have settled in.

Georgia, a former Russian colony and Soviet republic, has itself been on the receiving end of Russian aggression, most recently in 2008. These days around 20% of its territory is in the hands of Russian-backed separatists. Now the country is providing refuge to activists and journalists. Many are too young to remember Mr Putin’s war against Georgia. But they share the sentiment expressed on graffiti around Tbilisi: “**** Putin’s Russia”. Much of their energy and drive is being spent trying to ameliorate the impact of Mr Putin’s war against Ukraine.

Tickets to the Vakke conference cost 20 lari. Along with the cake money, the cash went to Emigration for Action, a charity that provides medication for Ukrainian refugees. Ekaterina Kiltau, one of its founders, was the final speaker. “We have come to Georgia, and we have the privilege to do and say what we want, to call the war a war [the word is banned in Russia] and to help Ukrainians,” she told the audience.

Other volunteer projects such as “Helping to Leave” and “Motskhaleba” (which means “mercy” in Georgian) grew out of chat groups on social media. Now they involve hundreds of volunteers helping thousands of Ukrainian refugees escape from the war. Larisa Melnikova, one of Motskhaleba’s co-founders, is a digital designer and a business consultant who used to work for the Russian branch of Boston Consulting Group, an American multinational. She has now turned her skills to writing an internet bot that helps human volunteers sort through requests for help. “I know that if I don’t do anything, I will be in greater pain,” she says. “I never voted for Putin, but I paid taxes in Russia and I bear responsibility for its actions.”

Back in Russia civic activists such as Ms Kiltau and Ms Melnikova helped monitor elections, volunteered for independent candidates and helped ovd-Info, a human-rights organisation that assists the victims of Russian state repression. Had they stayed in Russia and publicly protested against the war, they would most likely be in prison. That is what happened to Alexei Gorinov, a Moscow city council deputy sentenced to seven years in jail for criticising the war, and who rejected the idea of holding a children’s drawing competition while it was happening. “These people are heroes, but I feel I am more useful here,” says Ms Kiltau.

Working as a volunteer in Georgia, she says, is not just about helping Ukrainians but also about preserving their own sense of honour and sanity. “Pain, shame and responsibility” are three emotions that Ms Kiltau feels constantly. Her pain is acute: Rubtsovsk, the small town in Siberia from which she hails, and which was once surrounded by five gulag camps, became notorious as one of the top destinations for parcels sent home by Russian soldiers looting civilian property in Ukraine.

Echoes of history​

Like most Russian exiles in Tbilisi, those who gathered in the Vakke “home conference” fled Russia in the first two weeks of the war. They fled because they were afraid, and because they felt stifled by life under a regime that brooks no dissent. Spontaneous and emotional as their exit seemed to them, it was also part of a Kremlin “special operation”. By spreading rumours of imminent arrest or conscription, and sending thugs to harass activists and journalists, it drove those who publicly opposed the war out of the country.

Some were relocated by the firms they worked for. Others went under their own steam. A survey of recent émigrés showed that about a quarter of those who left settled in Georgia. The same number went to Istanbul, and another 15% ended up in Armenia. (These places do not require visas for Russian citizens.) Nearly half of those who left work in computing and it, according to a survey carried out in March. Another 16% were senior managers; 16% more worked in the arts and culture. Only 1.5% of emigrants ever supported Mr Putin’s United Russia party.

Today’s exiles are not the first Russians to flee abroad in the face of repressive rulers. A hundred years ago, during the Russian revolution, many aristocrats, soldiers in the anti-communist White Army, and members of the intelligentsia fled the Bolsheviks, who plunged Russia into a civil war after they seized power. Like their successors a century later, they made their way to Tiflis and Constantinople (modern-day Tbilisi and Istanbul).

Although today’s Russia is not embroiled in civil war, its invasion of Ukraine has cut through families. Arguments have split brothers from sisters and children from parents. (Such torn ties are the subject of a documentary by Andrei Loshak, a Russian film-maker who is among those to have moved to Georgia). Lately a barely detectable, but nevertheless real, tension is rising between those who left Russia and those who stayed, however similar their attitudes to the war. Behind the veneer of composure and energy among émigrés lies the pain of broken lives, a fractured country and homes left in a hurry.

The effects of the latest wave of emigration on Russia’s future is likely to be far greater than the mere numbers suggest. Andrei Zorin, a cultural historian at Oxford University, points out that the loss of the Westernised elite after the Bolshevik revolution in 1917 was ameliorated partly by the rise of bright children from the Russian peasantry, who were eager for education, and whom the new Communist authorities were eager to help.

They were joined by ethnic minority groups within the Soviet Union—Jews from the shtetls, Armenians, Georgians and people from the Baltic states, where literacy levels were highest. The reconstituted intelligentsia—which was dependent on the Communist Party, but often also critical of it—was essential to the state’s ability to develop technology, science and culture. In the 1980s it formed the social basis of Mikhail Gorbachev’s liberalising reforms.

These days, things are different. Having rejected modernisation in favour of traditionalism, imperial nationalism and war, the state ejected Europeanised Russians as superfluous, alien and dangerous. Today’s kleptocratic system squashes social mobility and holds little promise of progress. The departure of the educated class today could end a modernising trend that began in the 18th century, says Mr Zorin.

For many years after the fall of communism the modernising elite and the Russian state managed an uneasy cohabitation. In the 1990s and early 2000s the children of the Soviet intelligentsia rejected their parents’ beliefs, mocked anything Soviet and embraced capitalism as they understood it. They did not touch the foundations of the state, but they made Russia more liveable and attractive. They began to transform Moscow into a comfortable European capital, with cycle lanes and trendy art galleries and a quick food-delivery service called Yandex.Lavka—a subsidiary of Yandex, a home-grown tech giant.

Ilya Oskolkov-Tsentsiper is a media manager in his 50s who championed many of Russia’s most successful urbanist projects, including Afisha, one of Moscow’s first entertainment-listing magazines. Sitting in a café in Tel Aviv, his new home, he says the transformation began as an aesthetic endeavour. “We imagined and described Moscow not as a depressing and criminalised city with social problems and inequality, but as a bohemian European capital. The project was so successful that we started to believe [the change] was for real,” he says.

Over the past decade or so those decorations became increasingly backed by substance. Younger, engaged Russians created cultural institutions and launched volunteer projects independent of the state. They helped children with autism, opened shelters for the homeless, recorded podcasts about Russian literature and occasionally came out on protest marches. A survey of exiles conducted in March showed that 90% are interested in politics and 70% have donated money to non-government organisations and opposition-friendly media.

“We believed that our habits and our social practices would make the country humane; that our small deeds would have an effect,” says Sofia Khananishvili, a 23-year-old university graduate who used to teach literature at a school in Moscow. These days she works in a bookshop in Tbilisi called Dissident Books which she and her friends have opened. Among its titles is a volume called “Youth in the City: Cultures, Stages and Solidarities”.

Ms Khananishvili and her contemporaries were never in charge of the state, but they managed to co-exist with it. “We did not touch them and they did not touch us,” says one of her friends, an it specialist. They lived in the folds of the empire, benefiting from Russia’s oil-driven economy but trying to build their own lives apart from a state that was growing increasingly militaristic and repressive.

Few people tell the story of the relationship between the modernising class and the state as well as Ilya Krasilshchik, a media manager, and his girlfriend, Sonia Arshinova. At 35 Mr Krasilshchik had already been the youngest editor-in-chief at Afisha magazine; the publisher of Meduza, an independent online outlet based in Latvia; and more recently an executive at Yandex.Lavka, the food-delivery company. He started getting warnings about the war from inside Yandex back in November. The day after it started he met up with Ms Arshinova in a coffee shop in Moscow. “Everyone was talking about evacuation, looking up flights,” she recalls.

Ms Arshinova, who is 26, was a programme director at Strelka, Moscow’s flagship design and architecture institute. (Its rooftop bar was once a haunt of the beautiful and the well-connected.) When the war against Ukraine began she was working on bringing foreign experts to give lectures to a Russian audience on urban design. They never came. That day, she recalls, “The bubble burst and the **** was dripping down our eyes. We were behind the enemy lines and the enemy was our own city and our own country. We capitulated.”

A few weeks after they moved to Tbilisi, Russian authorities opened a criminal case against Mr Krasilshchik. An Instagram post about Russian atrocities in Bucha, a city in northern Ukraine, was enough to attract charges of “discrediting Russia’s armed forces”. These days Mr Krasilshchik scoots around Tbilisi on his red scooter, recording podcasts and running a new start-up, a half media and half support group called “Helpdesk Media”. It grew out of his Instagram account, which has 150,000 followers, and has the consumer-friendly interface of a Yandex service.

Instead of fast food, it delivers advice to people who need logistical, psychological or legal help. It also tells the stories of people affected by the war: the dead, the wounded, the refugees and the émigrés. “Our focus is men and women at the time of war whose lives have been uprooted and destroyed whoever they are,” he explains.

Most émigrés recognise that they are both lucky and privileged to have been in a position to leave. Many see their situation as temporary, and continue to support themselves by renting out their apartments in Russia. (By May, flows of money from Russia to Georgia had risen tenfold.)

Some of those who fled in the first weeks of the war, and who are not under an immediate threat of being arrested, have even been back to Russia temporarily, to see their parents or take care of personal affairs. “It is the strangest feeling. You go back and everything looks exactly the same—the same dentist, the same shops, the same restaurants—but everything has changed,” says Lika Kremer, a Russian podcast producer. The façade of a well-heeled European city is still there. But it has been hollowed out.

It is the silence and the absence of any overt sign of war that is most unbearable, says Ms Kremer. Unlike Ukraine’s refugees, many of whom choose to return to their homes as soon as they consider it at least somewhat safe, many of Russia’s exiles feel they have no country to go back to, and struggle to define what “Russia” actually means. “We have our identity, and our social connections, but no country of our own,” says Ilya Venyavkin, a historian.

Next year in Moscow​

The war, and physical separation from Russia, have inspired the idea of a different Russian nation, one that does not depend on an imperial identity, or even on geography. The first step for those pursuing that idea, argues Andrei Babitsky, a journalist who spends ten hours a week learning to read and write in Georgian, is to rid themselves of imperial arrogance. “I share this arrogance. Even today…I cannot stop thinking of the Russian language and Russian culture. My culture. I would gladly give it away entirely for a real peace, but I still cannot help thinking how my language is going to be alive after so many people have been killed in its name,” he wrote in a recent column.

Some exiles talk about creating a virtual state, where social structures can be built independently of any form of government or even geographical location. “Russia is not about longitude and latitude. The Russian diaspora is intellectually strong, motivated and emotionally charged, so it will undoubtedly survive,” says Fillip Dziadko, an author and publisher. “And we have learned to live without the state.”

Their hope is that the internet, and their own energy, will allow them to retain their presence in the same information space as their peers who stayed behind. For now at least, there are still holes in Russia’s regime of online censorship. YouTube is still available. vpn software, which can mask the websites a user is looking at, gives the tech-savvy access to the outside world. Independent media organisations such as Meduza and tv Rain have decamped to Riga, the capital of Latvia, and shifted their operations online.

Shimon Levin, an Israeli rabbi who was born and bred in Russia, who grew up with Russian literature and spent years serving the Jewish community, sees parallels between such thinking and the experience of the Jews, who managed to keep a distinct culture alive for thousands of years. The reasons Jews succeeded in keeping their identity, he explains, was that they put intellectual freedom and books, not land, at the centre of their national consciousness.

“Geography is an important marker of national identity, but identity is dynamic and can only thrive if it gets enriched by new meanings,” he continues. “If the Russian intellectual elite manages to develop its non-imperial identity and to focus on how to live in a new reality and what the “wonderful Russia of the future” [a term coined by Alexei Navalny, Russia’s opposition leader] should look like, it might at least partially compensate for the loss of their motherland.”

The current wave of emigration has a slogan—Poka Putin Zhiv, or “While Putin is Alive”. Nobody knows how long that will be, though time is certainly on the émigrés’ side. Most are in their 20s and 30s; Mr Putin turns 70 later this year. But despite their optimism, it is not certain that they will ever go back. It is even less certain what Russia will look like when the war ends. “The ongoing exodus of Russia’s educated Westernised class could be Russia’s last wave of emigration,” Mr Zorin says gloomily, “since there are no ways of reproducing that elite.” Mr Dziadko, a former student, prefers not to think too far ahead. “We don’t know where we are going to land,” he says. “Because we are still in flight.” ■
 

The ruble based MOEX Russia Index rose 1.5% to close at a near two-month high of 2,228 on Monday, with strong support from the heavyweight energy sector.

State-backed natural gas giant Gazprom jumped more than 2%, benefitting from record-high natural gas prices for delivery in Europe after it announced that the Nord Stream 1 pipeline will shut down for three days in the end of the month for maintenance, adding that the period of halted flows could extend if a problem is encountered.

Novatek tracked the jump in prices to surge over 6%.

Oil stocks also closed sharply in the green, led by Tatneft and Lukoil, despite the retreat in crude prices.

Recent data showed that weekly crude exports to Europe were at their highest since April of this year, despite the upcoming embargo on Russian oil in December.

1661210408108.png

 

The MOEX Russia Index closed 1.4% higher at 2,260 on Tuesday, the highest since the end of June as investors continued to monitor Russian energy exports to Europe and how it could effect Russia’s economy.

Lukoil and Rosneft both rose 2% to track the gains in oil prices after the Saudi energy minister said that OPEC+ members could ease supply to combat the recent downturn in crude prices.

Among oil service providers, Transneft shares also closed in the green after two of its pipelines delivering oil from Kazakhstan to Europe through Russia were shut down for maintenance.

Also, Gazprom added nearly 1.5%, benefitting from record-high natural gas prices for delivery in Europe after it announced that the Nord Stream 1 pipeline will shut down for three days at the end of the month for maintenance, adding that the period of halted flows could extend if a problem is encountered.

Miners also closed sharply higher, tracking prices for bullion and base metals amid low supply from China.

1661293837432.png
 

The MOEX Russia Index gave up on morning gains to close 0.5% lower at 2,245 on Wednesday, dropping from the eight-week high touched in the prior session as investors continued to monitor international commodity prices and Russian energy exports.

Financial shares led the losses in the session, pressured by a 5% plunge for TCS Group after the financial services firm published some results in its quarterly report.

Sberbank tracked the downturn in the sector to drop 3%.

In the meantime, Gazprom stocks closed nearly 1% down after booking sharp gains in the previous day, despite the extended surge for natural gas prices for delivery in Europe.

Lastly, lower borrowing costs and supply woes due to an energy crisis in China supported base metal prices internationally, driving Russian metallurgists to close well in the green.

1661379661765.png
 

The MOEX Russia Index erased gains from early in the session to close slightly below the flatline at 2,245 on Thursday, as losses for Moscow’s energy giants offset gains in miners, banks, and retail, as investors closely monitored volatile energy markets and their effect on Russia’s economy.

Oil shares Lukoil, Tatneft, and Rosneft dropped between 1.5%-1% as growth woes in Europe and Asia continued to weigh on the outlook of Russian oil exports.

On top of that, European oil companies continue to search for alternative sources ahead of the EU’s oil embargo in December.

In the meantime, Gazprom and Novatek were both in the red, despite prices for natural gas for delivery in Europe continuing to surge.

Also, Shares of M.Video-Eldorado plunged nearly 8% after the company reported a widening net loss for the first half of 2022.

1661466098943.png
 

The MOEX Russia Index closed 1% higher at 2,270 on Friday, the highest in two months, with strong support from Moscow’s energy giants as investors continued to monitor energy markets for insights on Russia’s key exports.

Gazprom and Novatek shares both closed 1% higher, supported by the 40% surge this week in prices of natural gas for delivery in Europe as the former continues to halt supply through the Nord Stream 1 pipeline.

Lukoil shares added 1.5% as investors awaited the release of second quarter results during the weekend, set to show strong profits due to surging oil prices in the period.

On the other hand, Bank of Saint Petersburg tanked 12% as the stock traded ex-dividend.

On the week, Russia’s benchmark stock index added 3.4%.

1661552051377.png


12 MOEX Chart
1661552093773.png


1661552124658.png
 

The MOEX Russia Index closed 1.2% up at a two-month high of 2,295 on Monday, with strong support from the financial sector as investors continued to monitor energy markets and corporate results.

TCS Group extended its volatile momentum and added 3.2%, rebounding from last week’s sharp decline when the financial services provider released a drop in first-half profits.

Lending giant VTB tracked the momentum in the sector and rose 2.3%. In the meantime, energy companies were also in the green.

Gazprom shares closed nearly 4% higher, following news that Hungary seeks additional natural gas supplies from Russia amid the energy crisis in Europe.

Oil companies were also higher, with a 1% advance for Tatneft after reporting a rise in profits for the quarter as world energy prices surged.

1661810831575.png


1661810865293.png
 
Top