- Joined
- 30 June 2008
- Posts
- 15,357
- Reactions
- 7,232
So Mick do you reckon highlighting how dangerous current extreme weather conditions are is hysteria ?
Something to be ignored or putdown in favour of cute diversions ?
What is this thread about Mick ? It was always a means to debase any intelligent discussion about climate change. It began with an article that postulated CC was way overblown and that climate scientists and anyone who acknowledged their efforts were just being "hysterical" . Labelling people as "hysterical" is the go to position of simply denying there is any problem and that in fact anyone who says there is is just "unstable" "hysterical". You may or may not be aware that this label was a common mechanism for 19th century husbands to have difficult wives put into asylums when they wanted them out of the way.
Maybe its well past the time to stop the name calling and look at the issue realistically.
Something to be ignored or putdown in favour of cute diversions ?
What is this thread about Mick ? It was always a means to debase any intelligent discussion about climate change. It began with an article that postulated CC was way overblown and that climate scientists and anyone who acknowledged their efforts were just being "hysterical" . Labelling people as "hysterical" is the go to position of simply denying there is any problem and that in fact anyone who says there is is just "unstable" "hysterical". You may or may not be aware that this label was a common mechanism for 19th century husbands to have difficult wives put into asylums when they wanted them out of the way.
Maybe its well past the time to stop the name calling and look at the issue realistically.