- Joined
- 14 February 2005
- Posts
- 15,104
- Reactions
- 16,904
Much of the debate misses that only about one third of Australian greenhouse gas emissions are a result of electricity generation whilst some of the rest, for example agriculture, aviation and cement, are technically a problem to eliminate. So for any major cut to total emissions, the other doable things, that is road and rail transport and stationary energy use (gas appliances etc) most certainly need to be addressed in a timely manner.What we need, and what we will get over the next decade is energy that is predominantly from renewable sources and blue hydrogen and nuclear fission.
Addressing road transport, rail transport, water heating, space heating and so on to majority extent involves powering it with electricity as the first step and that means consumers buying electric appliances and vehicles, not gas or petrol.
There's no technical fix that gets around the need for consumers to change what they buy.