Resisting Climate Hysteria

cynic said:

There you go again totally misconstruing what I was saying in a vain attempt to defend your precious 97% illusion!

34.8% does not a consensus maketh!!

Click to expand...

basilio said:

Do you ever wonder Noco why your views on this issue are regarded as totally delusional and completely separate from reality ?
( Of course not. Tha'ts the point of being totally delusional isn't it ?)

Click to expand...

• American Meteorological Society: Climate Change: An Information Statement of the American Meteorological Society
  
  "Indeed, strong observational evidence and results from modeling studies indicate that, at least over the last 50 years, human activities are a major contributor to climate change." (February 2007)
  
  
• American Physical Society: Statement on Climate Change
  
  "The evidence is incontrovertible: Global warming is occurring. If no mitigating actions are taken, significant disruptions in the Earth’s physical and ecological systems, social systems, security and human health are likely to occur. We must reduce emissions of greenhouse gases beginning now." (November 2007)
  
  
• American Geophysical Union: Human Impacts on Climate
  
  "The Earth's climate is now clearly out of balance and is warming. Many components of the climate system—including the temperatures of the atmosphere, land and ocean, the extent of sea ice and mountain glaciers, the sea level, the distribution of precipitation, and the length of seasons—are now changing at rates and in patterns that are not natural and are best explained by the increased atmospheric abundances of greenhouse gases and aerosols generated by human activity during the 20th century." (Adopted December 2003, Revised and Reaffirmed December 2007)
  
  
• American Association for the Advancement of Science: AAAS Board Statement on Climate Change
  
  "The scientific evidence is clear: global climate change caused by human activities is occurring now, and it is a growing threat to society." (December 2006)
  
  
• Geological Society of America: Global Climate Change
  
  "The Geological Society of America (GSA) supports the scientific conclusions that Earth’s climate is changing; the climate changes are due in part to human activities; and the probable consequences of the climate changes will be significant and blind to geopolitical boundaries." (October 2006)
  
  
• American Chemical Society: Statement on Global Climate Change
  
  "There is now general agreement among scientific experts that the recent warming trend is real (and particularly strong within the past 20 years), that most of the observed warming is likely due to increased atmospheric greenhouse gas concentrations, and that climate change could have serious adverse effects by the end of this century." (July 2004)
  

• U.S. National Academy of Sciences: Understanding and Responding to Climate Change
  
  "The scientific understanding of climate change is now sufficiently clear to justify taking steps to reduce the amount of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere." (2005)
  
  
• International academies: Joint science academies’ statement: Global response to climate change
  
  "Climate change is real. There will always be uncertainty in understanding a system as complex as the world’s climate. However there is now strong evidence that significant global warming is occurring." (2005, 11 national academies of science)
  
  
• International academies The Science of Climate Change
  
  "Despite increasing consensus on the science underpinning predictions of global climate change, doubts have been expressed recently about the need to mitigate the risks posed by global climate change. We do not consider such doubts justified." (2001, 16 national academies of science)
  

• National Research Council of the National Academies, America’s Climate Choices
  
  "Most of the recent warming can be attributed to fossil fuel burning and other human activities that release carbon dioxide and other heat-trapping greenhouse gases into the atmosphere." America's Climate Choices, Advancing the Science of Climate Change, 2010
  
  
• U.S. Climate Change Research Program, Global Climate Change Impacts in the United States (2009)
  
  "Global warming is unequivocal and primarily human-induced. Global temperature has increased over the past 50 years. This observed increase is due primarily to human-induced emissions of heat-trapping gases."

luutzu said:

90 to 100% does maketh though.

Your logic is this...

I walk down the street and randomly ask people 'Do you think this guy call Cynic is right about CC?"

I don't know, I haven't look into his opinion so I have no position on it.

What? Alright, that's a negative then. One more person saying Cynic is wrong on CC.


Not looking good Cynic, lots of people who have never heard of you are saying you're wrong man.

Click to expand...

noco said:

Lu are your feathers pink and grey or white with a yellow crest, because you keep squawking on this 97%.

That is old hat and proven to be wrong.

Give up man...you are fighting a losing battle.

The debate is over.

Click to expand...

noco said:

Lu are your feathers pink and grey or white with a yellow crest, because you keep squawking on this 97%.

That is old hat and proven to be wrong.

Give up man...you are fighting a losing battle.

The debate is over.

Click to expand...

luutzu said:

I thought it's red and green

Oh man! That's why we're all on to this CC thing. We're working for the Chinese Communists!

See, the comrades are getting ahead because they don't care for clean this and not poison that... Thank God for Trump and his we-also-don't-care-if-you-poor-all-die policies. Make merka great again!

Click to expand...

luutzu said:

90 to 100% does maketh though.

Your logic is this...

I walk down the street and randomly ask people 'Do you think this guy call Cynic is right about CC?"

I don't know, I haven't look into his opinion so I have no position on it.

What? Alright, that's a negative then. One more person saying Cynic is wrong on CC.


Not looking good Cynic, lots of people who have never heard of you are saying you're wrong man.

Click to expand...

basilio said:

While we are on the subject of Juice Medias take on Government policies check out where Koalas and Forests are going.


______________

That's a nice little line on the evironmental value of CO2 you have there Wayne. I won't bite because you are almost as good a troller as Noco and that is especially smelly bait.

By the way I understand the other CC (concentration camps) were excellent at curing obesity problems. 100% success I believe.

Click to expand...

noco said:

This thread is really becoming one big joke.

CC is all to do with the Sun and is going through its cycle....Many articles have been posted on the subject but unfortunately the Alarmist will not accept it and will continue on with their scam......They will never admit they could be wrong.......

Click to expand...

noco said:

The debate is over.

Click to expand...

Tisme said:

If a missile is heading towards our shores, should we try to mitigate the risk or just agree it was launched by someone we can't control and allow it through our defences?

Click to expand...

SirRumpole said:

Yes it is, and you lost.

Click to expand...

Tisme said:

If a missile is heading towards our shores, should we try to mitigate the risk or just agree it was launched by someone we can't control and allow it through our defences?

Click to expand...

cynic said:

How many wind farms and batteries of solar panels do you think we'd need to repel it?

Or maybe a 10% missile tax, yeah that'll fix it for ya!

Click to expand...

cynic said:

Exactly which part of 34.8% is beyond your mathematical comprehension?

Click to expand...

Tisme said:

Don't know what the camel's back load is at the moment, but worth a crack given it's spawning new industries. enthusiasm and employment anyway.

Click to expand...

luutzu said:

A bit risky isn't it McGee? I mean, cleaner air? Come one. Cleaner waterways? Who needs that? Cheaper energy because once the infrastructure is established, the raw material are delivered by nature pretty much on time and around the clock... are we going to relay on the Sun rising with chances of clouds, or are we going to rely on Aurizon delivering coals on time whether it rain, hail, flooded, or shine?

Then there's the unnecessary waste of building flood barriers, flood pumps, sea walls. Why risk and waste that when if CC does raise sea level, we'll just move all the world's ports and cities and farmland a bit higher up.

Click to expand...