Luutzu, I am still waiting for your answer....Do you have a number or not?
Is that 90% of all scientist through out the world or 90% of a couple of thousand hand picked by the UN who are sympathetic to the UN's Global Warming cause?
Luutzu, I am still waiting for your answer....Do you have a number or not?
Is that 90% of all scientist through out the world or 90% of a couple of thousand hand picked by the UN who are sympathetic to the UN's Global Warming cause?
http://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/Multiple studies published in peer-reviewed scientific journals1 show that 97 percent or more of actively publishing climate scientists agree: Climate-warming trends over the past century are extremely likely due to human activities. In addition, most of the leading scientific organizations worldwide have issued public statements endorsing this position. The following is a partial list of these organizations, along with links to their published statements and a selection of related resources.
Here we go:
http://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/
From same website:
American Association for the Advancement of Science
"The scientific evidence is clear: global climate change caused by human activities is occurring now, and it is a growing threat to society." (2006)
American Chemical Society
"Comprehensive scientific assessments of our current and potential future climates clearly indicate that climate change is real, largely attributable to emissions from human activities, and potentially a very serious problem." (2004)
Multiple studies published in peer-reviewed scientific journals1 show that 97 percent or more of actively publishing climate scientists agree: Climate-warming trends over the past century are extremely likely due to human activities. In addition, most of the leading scientific organizations worldwide have issued public statements endorsing this position. The following is a partial list of these organizations, along with links to their published statements and a selection of related resources.
What I am trying to establish is that 97% of how many climate scientists agree?...You don't give a number!!!!!!
Is it 97% of 2000 or 2500 or maybe just 18?
97% from 11,944 research papers.
Each research would have multiple authors. So it's not a couple of guys at a bar.
Scanned through and it seem a few studies examining this consensus points to high 90s to 100% total agreement on climate change.
Some of the paper define a climate change scientist as one who published at least 20 studies on the subject. So these are not PhD graduate or some noop.. .but are actually expert and likely have been spending their entire career on the subject.
More here: http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/11/4/048002
So what do you say about 31,478 scientists who do not agree with your unknown number of scientist who have put out 11,944 research papers.
I believe the scientists you have mentioned are hand picked by the UN and the whole thing is a manipulation of the truth......The UN are not interested in scientists who are skeptics ...The UN don't even want to know them....
they are not allowed to express their opinion...Myself and some others on this Forum are ridiculed by a few naive posters as if we don't have the right to express our opinion even when you are proved wrong.....You and your mates want to dominate this thread as though you own it....You are always right and all others are wrong......perhaps one day we may all be proved wrong......
I have proved to you and some of your supporters about the fallacy of Greenland and in time you will be proved wrong about the exaggeration of the Great Barrier Reef......There is only 2% of complete carol death ...Why do you Greenies try to make out the reef has been totally destroyed when it is not true....It has suffered before on so many occasions over 500,000 years and has always recovered....As I told you I can recall the reef under stress in 1950 when I holidayed on South Molle Island.
The petition signed by 31,478 scientists from around the world was conducted by OISM (Oregon Institute of Science and Medicine) who all agreed Climate change is not caused by CO2 emissions.
www.petitionproject.org
Do not bother Luutzu, in the same way whatever argument, figure, truth or actual experience I have,nothing can change your "belief" about the illegal immigrants/aka refugees invation of europe,
And Noco will never change his "belief".
Why do you have to make me agree with qldfrog?
Noco, 97% of research into Climate Change, of research by scientist specialising on the matter; scientists who spent their career studying the thing... 97% of known scientific research concludes that CC is happening and will likely cause devastating damage... and they're all wrong?
You do know that not all scientists are equal right? There are scientists and then there are "scientist"; there are specialists and there are some guy with a science degree and maybe a postgrad degree in some other science. Then there are sell-outs too. Scientists do like money and a nice job backed by big money.
Anyway, I'm sure that all "us" climate alarmist wish we're wrong. BUt what if we're not wrong? What if the science is right? What if you're wrong? Could your tears or apologies or bad feelings reverse the damage and prevent the deaths then?
Let see...
Prolonged drought will reduce crops, jack up global prices, destroy crops and harvests, poor people starve or die.
Rising sea level floods the deltas, salt fertile land, destroy crops, send poor farmers the world over into further poverty and hunger, they flee to higher grounds and get send back for being economic migrants.
Higher temperature in the ocean, the atmosphere causes larger, more deadly, more frequent hurricane and storm surge; extreme weather.... people die.
But people always die and new ones are born?
anyway, she'll be right. What does scientists know or done anything good with their knowledge and research anyway.
So we should all be terrified to death.......when is all this going happen?...Please tell me?
Believe what you like mate, you're wrong and everyone knows it except you and your deluded mates
You may get your head out of the sand one day, but I doubt it.
Watched David Attenboroughs final Barrier Reef episode last night.
Very sad. He expects the reef to be mostly gone in 40 years unless we change our ways. 40% gone already. If you love eating fish then this is particuarly bad. He blames global warming, acidification of the ocean, fertilizer run off and human predation.
Agree, particularly the supposed melt of Greenland 1000 years ago. Prevously fixed perma frost/ice millions of years old now slipping into the sea.
The main part of the reef that has been affected is north of Port Douglas to Thursday Island where there no fertilizer run off.
Why don't you make some remark on Greenland??
You have not noco, could not even get your link up, told you so and no response.
If you actually read some of the science papers and how the physical evidence is examined and tested there is no doubt.
Have you bothered to read "The Sixth Extinction" yet. This must be about the fifth time I have asked.
Read the attached. There is a cold "blob" around Greenland, but the rest of the world is warmer than average.
This article explains why.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...bout-a-cold-blob-in-the-north-atlantic-ocean/
So why can't you and other alarmists accept my POV?
If you were a scientist I might.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?