- Joined
- 8 June 2008
- Posts
- 13,128
- Reactions
- 19,310
Peabody CEO says 'policies such as the carbon tax and renewable energy target had hurt the sector and called for whoever (sic) won the federal election to repeal the carbon tax and streamline the project permitting system'.
It's wrong to suggest the only problem is the lower price of coal.
I don't know about the rest of Australia, but regional Qld electricity suppliers are all owned by the government, so no way of blaming privatisation here.
I don't know about the rest of Australia, but regional Qld electricity suppliers are all owned by the government, so no way of blaming privatisation here.
There seems to be rather a lot of attributing cause and effect in accordance with the philosophy of the person attempting to make the argument.
http://www.business.qld.gov.au/indu...electricity-queensland/electricity-generationGovernment-owned corporations have a stake in about 65% of the state's generation capacity, but the numbers of partially or fully privately owned power stations are increasing. The Queensland Government plans to reduce the share of the aggregate capacity the state owns or operates in Queensland to around 50%, primarily as a result of new capacity requirements being met by the private sector.
So its the greenies fault that gold plating occurred!
You obviously have no idea, and no practical experience growing food commercially.
You read it on the internet, therefore it must be true.
Stop embarrassing yourself by quoting reports as fact.
This might be usefull to pass on to party HQ 'Sprinkles' " Lessons From The Ord "
http://www.cis.org.au/images/stories/policy-monographs/pm-2.pdf
And that's just for starters more reading on the intrigues that promoted the original development through the Menzies admin is well worth the effort. Check the name of the 'Whitey' who first trudged the banks back in the late 1800's, notice any relationship to an operator in the region these days?
All fits well with the deeply ingrained ethos of agrarian socialism kept just beneath the tweed of the squatocracy.
Oh and wayneL, ' so I was saying' was in the paragraph directly above your lifted quote. To compare you to a goldfish would be...well, unfair to goldfish. So when your ready to come out from under the bed with your chewed plastic sword, only to be skewered again, whilst revealing the porosity of intellectual rigour of the charlatans you present... Just answer the questions, your 'Mills & Boon' is off topic.
Oh and wayneL, ' so I was saying' was in the paragraph directly above your lifted quote. To compare you to a goldfish would be...well, unfair to goldfish. So when your ready to come out from under the bed with your chewed plastic sword, only to be skewered again, whilst revealing the porosity of intellectual rigour of the charlatans you present... Just answer the questions, your 'Mills & Boon' is off topic.
wayneL;786197] ...I also admit that my observations are in fact empirically accurate,...
A joke surely ?
Surely not Explod. We know, because Wayne told us ,that the world is actually not warming at all. It's just urban heat island effects and dodgy recalibration of temperature records by the BOM et al.
That is empirically certain. Nothing to worry about as far as the climate. Just a bunch (of about 10,000) pseudo scientists who want to get billions of dollars in grants to study ice that isn't melting, floods that aren't occurring, extreme cliamte events that aren't happening and species that aren't going extinct.
That is empirically certain. Nothing to worry about as far as the climate. Just a bunch (of about 10,000) pseudo scientists who want to get billions of dollars in grants to study ice that isn't melting, floods that aren't occurring, extreme cliamte events that aren't happening and species that aren't going extinct.
All events that have been happening since the dawn of time and will continue to happen regardless of human influence.
.
Duh! What about things that happen because of human influence?
You stated humans don't influence the world.
Obviously this is untrue. We make animals extinct, we turn areas into deserts...and yet we can't influence the weather????
You can't accept scientific peer review, you can't even read the facts on the sudden rise in temperatures, the melting of the arctic, the massive rise in sea levels and yet you call basilio myopic? Pot kettle.
You should me credible, peer reviewed (by a independent body, not a for/against group) scientific statistical evidence that there are more:
-Eathquakes
-Cyclones/Tornadoes/Hurricanes
-Tsunamis
-Volcanic Eruptions
-Floods
-Wild Fires
I haven't back-read this whole thread yet, so not sure of you're understanding on the subject. I assumed that you're constant use of "global warming ... oops climate change" was just **** stirring, but the above comment suggests you don't understand the basic principles behind the theory of global warming.
An increased proportion of so called greenhouse gases in a closed atmosphere have been shown to retain heat.
It's also well known that temperature levels and temperature differentials have significant influence over weather patterns. Coupled together it is plausible that a sufficient proportion of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere could see changes in weather patterns that may result in an increased frequency or severity of cyclones, floods, droughts and wild fires.
Personally I'm not convinced that it's conclusive if and when any long-term damage will be done, although I'd rather err on the side of caution, and think our general level of pollution needs to be addressed anyway, as does the rapid depletion of finite resources
Argue back and forth on the significance of the effect of mankind all you want.
Last I checked though no-one was suggesting that changes in atmospheric temperatures, even at the extremes of any projections, would have any effect on magma flows or tectonic plate movement. Have you?
Perhaps you should
No mate... Life is too short...
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?