- Joined
- 16 June 2005
- Posts
- 4,281
- Reactions
- 6
.. For example 12 years ago scientists wouldn't have foreseen that the rapid warming of the arctic would push colder. moist air southwards to Europe and intensify extreme winter weather...
I thought AGWers have been proclaiming the science is settled. If it is settled, how come they are still learning?
Why did they resort to such lies stating it is settled when it wasn't? Why haven't they apologised about claiming it was settled when now you post they didn't foresee some things. Unbelievable.
And Bas, do you have a vested financial interest in carbon tax or global warming? I don't recall you answering that question and I think it is valid given the repetitive spamming you keep dishing up here.
For example 12 years ago scientists wouldn't have foreseen that the rapid warming of the arctic would push colder. moist air southwards to Europe and intensify extreme winter weather.
Did you just make this up?
Arctic Ice Melt Is Setting Stage for Severe Winters
June 6, 2012 ”” The dramatic melt-off of Arctic sea ice due to climate change is hitting closer to home than millions of Americans might think.
Are you serious Sails ? There is almost never any certainty including science. Every field of science is discovering and learning new things every day.
That was very clever post your wrote lamenting the fact that scientists just didn't know everything about the climate and couldn't foresee the future.
As I finished writing (yet another) explanation of the basics of AGW I realised there was no way you could have been as silly/naive to actually believe what you said. You were just successfully winding me up.
Well done
What risks are we prepared to take ? How much absolute certainty do we need of what will happen if we jump off a tall building ?
sails;754932]I thought AGWers have been proclaiming the science is settled. If it is settled, how come they are still learning?
Why did they resort to such lies stating it is settled when it wasn't? Why haven't they apologised about claiming it was settled when now you post they didn't foresee some things. Unbelievable.
And Bas, do you have a vested financial interest in carbon tax or global warming? I don't recall you answering that question and I think it is valid given the repetitive spamming you keep dishing up here.
Produce some evidence that they claimed it was settled,
science does not make such claims.
Is the chart of a stock on the ASX settled, no we follow the chart. Where has anyone claimed it is settled?
ROTFLMAO
If im bullish am I an ASX denier?
Very smart and sophisticated ole pal.
On the floor, yep the intelligence level I suspected.
But it would sure suit for your esteemed cheer squad.
MWYour post, grossly misrepresenting AGW realist scientists by highlighting that the science is settled on CO2 causing warming is just crazy, loopy, and downright stupidity.
Of course all scientists know that CO2 is a greenhouse gas, it is just that the use of it in models is flawed at the moment, and hence the horrendously inaccurate predictions/projections of the IPCC and the "good scientists"
also stating that CO2 was the driving force for temperature rises in the past is misleading as well, and anyone with any barely basic understanding of geology knows this to be true.
Very smart and sophisticated ole pal.
On the floor, yep the intelligence level I suspected.
But it would sure suit for your esteemed cheer squad.
coming from an intellectual pygmy, scathing
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?