wayneL
VIVA LA LIBERTAD, CARAJO!
- Joined
- 9 July 2004
- Posts
- 25,947
- Reactions
- 13,236
Thanks forthat Wayne......you means it's not all our fault after all?
Cheers,
CanOz
Can't access it without shelling out a fair bit of money.
I find the theory doubtful.
When you see a curve matching something precisely using a non linear relationship, you get the feeling that they are matching the data and working backwards, rather like beginners developing an algorythm in the sharemarket to match future performance.
of course the amount of ozone is affected by cosmic waves - thats been known for decades. The leap of faith is how changing ozone in the atmosphere effects land temperatures. It doesn't sound very plausible.
As I said I would love to see the paper and see the context.
Knobby, you'll have to come up with something a bit better than 'I don't like what it says so I don't believe it'.
Some scientific basis for refutation would be good.
I haven't been.
Did you see the latest IPCC report which specifically agrees with you re:weather events saying the effect at this stage is quite small?
Just remember you are reading the Australian - one long daily spin sheet produced by a very corrupt company. I am looking forward to some big names going to prison over the next few years, but I suppose you are on top of the latest scandal that even the FBI is getting involved with.
But if rubbishing the Australian is the only defence you have for this nonsense tax, then you really are grasping at straws...
I have never defended the tax, I am against it as I have stated previously.
Just look at this and say there is nothing in it.
There is a lot of money going around to obscurate the science.
http://climate.nasa.gov/evidence/
Did you see the latest IPCC report which specifically agrees with you re:weather events saying the effect at this stage is quite small?
We had a classic example a month back in this thread.
You mean the Gleik/Heartland Fakegate saga?
Sails, just be skeptical about the "information" provided by organisations formed to provide this "information" for financial reasons.
Who's talking in riddles now. Some qualification for the uneducated please?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?