- Joined
- 25 February 2011
- Posts
- 5,689
- Reactions
- 1,233
Some might challenge their claims by showing video clips of a stage magician emulating similar feats, and insisting that it was all trickery. Or others might simply impugn the cognitive factors of the ones claiming to have witnessed miraculous events.Should one believe if they saw Paul work those wonders or Jesus rise from the dead, or should they just pick another religion?
while I also don't claim that they are false, I simply don't believe them
It’s actually not a contradiction at all if you take a moment to understand the position.How to contradict yourself in one sentence.
I did, for 2/3s of my life. Then I started to think critically about my experiences and beliefs and I realised it was all self delusion. The more I spoke with or read the writings of others who also believed they had been blessed by the Holy Spirit, I could also see that they were simply deluding themselves as well. Everything was filtered to confirm their belief. Something good happens, particularly in relation to health, and it was due to the Holy Spirit. But the preceding event that caused the health issue was somehow ignored. The more I observed them, the more gullible I realised them to be. A cloud that only vaguely resembles a cross was somehow a sign from God. Statues moved even though cameras showed they didn't and rational explanations of the occurrences were simply ignored and put down to "you must have faith to see it". I believe even one of your first posts on this thread related to some event in the Phillipines that was easily explicable with a modicum of science knowledge. And even one of the happenings in that video, the rainbow rising from the head of the statue, was quite obviously wrong. Even you acknowledged that "happening" was not important compared to the rest of the video, but it had to be pointed out to you before you acknowledged it.
There were high hopes the Shroud of Turin was the burial cloth of Jesus. Turned out to be carbon dated in the Middle Ages. Looks like King Arthur to me. The Roman Catholics treasure it and will claim it as the Jesus burial cloth. Perfect to keep the disciples believing.The earliest writings we have about him date to 100 years after he died, anyone that has played Chinese whispers, or seen rumours spread knows it takes less than 5 minutes for stories passed by word of mouth to change, So everything that "Jesus" said or did in the bible is unlikely to represent actual happenings, he might not have even existed at all as represented in the bible.
Somewhat reminiscent of this excerpt from the gospel according to BaldrickThere were high hopes the Shroud of Turin was the burial cloth of Jesus. Turned out to be carbon dated in the Middle Ages. Looks like King Arthur to me. The Roman Catholics treasure it and will claim it as the Jesus burial cloth. Perfect to keep the disciples believing.
Somewhat reminiscent of this excerpt from the gospel according to Baldrick
Makes for effective comedy to some, sacrilege to others.
Apparently there's quite a trade in false relics of another of Earth's deities:
https://www.elvis.com.au/presley/elvis-autographs.shtml
Which raises the question: Apart from the human capacity for mendacious acts, what do false relics actually prove?
Is the existence of Elvis Presley now in dispute?
And are we no longer able to appreciate the recorded music accredited to him?
Some might challenge their claims by showing video clips of a stage magician emulating similar feats, and insisting that it was all trickery. Or others might simply impugn the cognitive factors of the ones claiming to have witnessed miraculous events.
To my understanding,the important thing for each person, is to seek out the truth for themselves, making their own determinations about how to live responsibly and accordingly, whilst allowing others the space to do likewise.
And for those having the startling experience, of having truth come crashing into their lives, before it was actually sought, similar sentiments apply. i.e. live according to that which is now known.
One of the things I noticed when reading the Revelation according to John, was that of the events it foretold, some had previously occurred in Exodus. This suggested to me that there may exist longer term cycles of societal evolution, giving rise to repetitious manifestation of archetypal events/elements.You've expressed here what seems to be a belief system that subscribes to Judaism, or much of it anyway, with some personal flexibility. I'm surprised the posters here didn't really question you more as I was curious myself. As well as those beliefs you mentioned before, I'm guessing you are anticipating a Messiah right? If that is the case, I'd like to know a bit more about what kind of figure this might be in your eyes?
There were high hopes the Shroud of Turin was the burial cloth of Jesus. Turned out to be carbon dated in the Middle Ages. Looks like King Arthur to me. The Roman Catholics treasure it and will claim it as the Jesus burial cloth. Perfect to keep the disciples believing.
If there are people who genuinely experience the Holy Spirit,.
Wouldn't you have to prove the Holy Spirit exists before you can use it as an explanation for something?
I mean before we say "Aliens did that" we should probably supply evidence that aliens exist.
The same criticism, could be rightly applied to the hasty invocation, by scientists, of the unproven "dark matter" concept, as being the explanation for effects that would otherwise lie beyond the scope of contemporary scientific comprehension.
Science is actively gathering evidence and promotes inquiry into the subject, I am un aware of any studies being conducted by the Vatican into the existence of the holy spirit, They simply want you to accept their word on faith.
The Vatican isn't the only theistic entity in existence.Science is actively gathering evidence and promotes inquiry into the subject, I am un aware of any studies being conducted by the Vatican into the existence of the holy spirit, They simply want you to accept their word on faith.
So you example is not valid.
The thing that makes the treatment of the "dark matter" concept analogous, is the presumption (by many scientists) to its existence, despite the absence of proof.
What sort of evidence do you want ?
The Vatican isn't the only theistic entity in existence.
The thing that makes the treatment of the "dark matter" concept analogous, is the presumption (by many scientists) to its existence, despite the absence of proof.
People keep talking of "the God of the gaps", dark matter seems to be one of these.
Except science is actively trying to understand and reduce the gaps, religion relies on the gaps, its doesn't want to fill them.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?