Sean K
Moderator
- Joined
- 21 April 2006
- Posts
- 22,405
- Reactions
- 11,802
Yes, and yes. Also, teachers are in a pretty good position to provide some guidance. Very important people it would seem. That's why they are paid so well, I suppose.Yes, it's a shame it's not Ma & Pa though...
...or maybe not, as the case may be.
When Marduk heard the word of the gods,
His heart prompted him and he devised a cunning plan.
He opened his mouth and unto Ea he spake
That which he had conceived in his heart he imparted unto him:
"My blood will I take and bone will I fashion
I will make man, that man may
I will create man who shall inhabit the earth,
That the service of the gods may be established, and that their shrines may be built.
But I will alter the ways of the gods, and I will change their paths;
Together shall they be oppressed and unto evil shall they....
He mounted the chariot, the storm unequaled for terror,
He harnessed and yoked unto it four horses,
Destructive, ferocious, overwhelming, and swift of pace;
... were their teeth, they were flecked with foam;
They were skilled in... , they had been trained to trample underfoot.
... . mighty in battle,
Draft #1 “There are undeniably fine upright and compassionate Christians”
Or rather
Draft #2 “There are undeniably fine upright and compassionate people whose Christianity is not allowed to stand in the way of a free expression of those qualities”
But even that is a lopsided way of looking at the question …
Draft #3 “There are simply those people who never allow their religion to stand in the way of their human qualities”
That’s better, now we’re getting somewhere - Try again one final time
Draft #4 “There are those with a high moral purpose whose religion is merely incidental to their attitude; Immediately religion becomes a motivating force, instead of a mere adjunct to instincts all men are born with, it occupies too great a place in the psyche for a balanced outlook”.
This website is a must read to see how some contrarian ideas can go wrong.
They have a section dedicated to religion and it blows my mind.
http://www.whatstheharm.net/
Another interesting thing is the definition of delusion.
"A fixed belief that has no basis in reality, and is not affected by rational argument or evidence to the contrary."
www.copingwithmentalillness.com/cope/resources/glossary.aspx
"A fixed, false belief that is resistant to reason or factual disproof."
www.enotes.com/nursing-encyclopedia/schizophrenia
I got these definitions from typing "define: delusion" (without quotation marks) into Google.
Flabbergasted.
What hope for the human race when this is allowed to continue.
Amnesty: Rape girl, 13, killed for adultery
Aisha Ibrahim Duhulow, 13, was stoned to death October 27.
Amnesty says 1,000 spectators watched the punishment, report adds
Rights groups says she was accused of adultery after claiming she was raped
MOGADISHU, Somalia (AP) -- A 13-year-old girl who said she had been raped was stoned to death in Somalia after being accused of adultery by Islamic militants, a human rights group said.
Dozens of men stoned Aisha Ibrahim Duhulow to death Oct. 27 in a stadium packed with 1,000 spectators in the southern port city of Kismayo, Amnesty International and Somali media reported, citing witnesses.
The Islamic militia in charge of Kismayo had accused her of adultery after she reported that three men had raped her, the rights group said.
Nope. It just becomes a grand delusion. How that is taken up into a belief system is irrelevant, it's whether it is a false or true belief that counts. But you can see through people like Berkeley what can be claimed in a subsequently "logical" and "rational" way when grand delusions are taken or assumed to be true.I have a mate in Perth who is a trickcyclist and emailed him this.
He said that it is partially true, however, if the belief is culturally appropriate it is not a delusion.
So I guess that religion is not a delusion, its a belief.
gg
Nope. It just becomes a grand delusion. How that is taken up into a belief system is irrelevant, it's whether it is a false or true belief that counts. But you can see through people like Berkeley what can be claimed in a subsequently "logical" and "rational" way when grand delusions are taken or assumed to be true.
What I want to know is this:
How come we lock up agnostic or atheist schizophrenics, when the same people who are religious are lauded as prophets and "provide messages from god", in the form of revelation?
Because there seem to be an awful lot of horrendously and dangerously insane people out there that would actually be locked up if they weren't religious...
Nope. It just becomes a grand delusion. How that is taken up into a belief system is irrelevant, it's whether it is a false or true belief that counts. But you can see through people like Berkeley what can be claimed in a subsequently "logical" and "rational" way when grand delusions are taken or assumed to be true.
What I want to know is this:
How come we lock up agnostic or atheist schizophrenics, when the same people who are religious are lauded as prophets and "provide messages from god", in the form of revelation?
Because there seem to be an awful lot of horrendously and dangerously insane people out there that would actually be locked up if they weren't religious...
You and I are both aware that the majority of people are just plain idiots.Agree mate.
However Rudd, Bush, Abbot, Obama, Biden, McCain, Palin, Amrozi (until today)
Osama, Sarkozy and one hundred other leaders all trot off to worship weekly.
So its a matter of " in the land of the blind the one eyed man is king" or
Go with the flo.
It has gone crazy.
gg
You and I are both aware that the majority of people are just plain idiots.
Therefore, to appeal to the majority of these idiots, leaders have to appear on certain levels on par. That means taking on, or feigning beliefs, no matter how moronic.
I mean... could you imagine a presidential candidate going through the bible belt telling voters that light bends and therefore their "god" is a complete croc of ****, as horizoning disallows any possible omniscience? It would be a laugh though...
But then again, if we were drawing the meat curtains Sarkozy is on a daily basis, we may be willing to re-think our positions on some concepts...
You and I are both aware that the majority of people are just plain idiots.
Therefore, to appeal to the majority of these idiots, leaders have to appear on certain levels on par. That means taking on, or feigning beliefs, no matter how moronic.
I mean... could you imagine a presidential candidate going through the bible belt telling voters that light bends and therefore their "god" is a complete croc of ****, as horizoning disallows any possible omniscience? It would be a laugh though...
But then again, if we were drawing the meat curtains Sarkozy is on a daily basis, we may be willing to re-think our positions on some concepts...
How does this possibly make God a crock of ****??? Come on now, God made light so I think horizoning is a bit below Him
And also, no western religion is actually logically possible. There are only two arguments that are logically valid for God's existence IMO, and they have nothing to do with christianity.
And also, no western religion is actually logically possible. There are only two arguments that are logically valid for God's existence IMO, and they have nothing to do with christianity.
I believe that religion is more an insight into the makeup of the human psychology than the makeup of the universe.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?