Julia
In Memoriam
- Joined
- 10 May 2005
- Posts
- 16,986
- Reactions
- 1,973
Disagree, Nioka. I don't claim to be 'good' but for most of my adult life, even when working full time, I've volunteered in various capacities helping people with whom I have no connection in any personal sense. I don't have religious beliefs, nor was I brought up in a religious environment (other than a few ghastly visits to Sunday School as a kid).It is people being good but they are that way through, and because of, their religious upbringing or beliefs.
Now you are quoting me out of context. I'm not suggesting that you have to be religious to be a good person. The discussion at that time was about religious organisations and their voluntary work. Good people will be good with or without religion but it is a religious upbringing that will encourage there to be more good people and help those that may be "bad" to become better people.
A good example was the recent pope's visit. The young had a ball without sex, drugs and rock and roll. Had it been a rock fest with 400,000 young people together I'm sure there would have been a lot more young lives needing repair at the end of the session.
Disagree, Nioka. I don't claim to be 'good' but for most of my adult life, even when working full time, I've volunteered in various capacities helping people with whom I have no connection in any personal sense. I don't have religious beliefs, nor was I brought up in a religious environment (other than a few ghastly visits to Sunday School as a kid).
And of all the fellow volunteers I know, none of them is motivated by any religious inspiration, but rather a belief that any community is about as good as the contributions of its members.
I think we'll talk this one around in circles till the cows come home.
She sums my opinion up pretty well.If you think there have been some harsh words said in this thread, check out Catherine Deveney in The Age today:
http://www.theage.com.au/opinion/re...o-believe-in-one-fewer-god-20080722-3jas.html
At the heart of pantheism is reverence of the universe as the ultimate focus of reverence, and for the natural earth as sacred.
Scientific or Natural Pantheism - Pan for short - has a naturalistic approach which simply accepts and reveres the universe and nature just as they are, and promotes an ethic of respect for human and animal rights and for lifestyles that sustain rather than destroy the environment.
. However I am open minded. I have had some unique experiences that leave me wondering. One I described on another thread which I cant find at the moment but it defies logical explanation.
WayneL, I think you'll find that most atheists' thinking goes along the lines of "There's no evidence for a god, therefore I choose to believe there isn't one. Show me some hard evidence and I could well change my mind."
Hard evidence does NOT include what appears to be the face of Jesus in a toasted cheese sandwich or other such cases of pareidolia.
WayneL, I think you'll find that most atheists' thinking goes along the lines of "There's no evidence for a god, therefore I choose to believe there isn't one. Show me some hard evidence and I could well change my mind."
Hard evidence does NOT include what appears to be the face of Jesus in a toasted cheese sandwich or other such cases of pareidolia.
So on the topic of religion, a much debated topic, most people will go to extremes - atheism or religious dogma - with very few people maintaining moderate or "in between" views.
But the only truly intellectual position in my humble opinion is agnosticism as this leaves the door open for any discovery/revelation, and awaits conclusive proof one way or the other.
Just my 2c
One aspect of this discussion I feel a bit uncomfortable about is the sense of intellectual superiority implicit in the posts from some of the confirmed atheists. There is a derision and denigration towards those who do have religious beliefs which would get well and truly shouted down were it to be flowing in the other direction. There are plenty of highly intelligent and well educated people who have religious beliefs.
I think what I'm feeling here is that in our mostly secular society it probably takes quite a bit of courage to openly state religious affiliations, especially on a thread like this.
Agree. I won't be holding my breath waiting for the proof, though.But the only truly intellectual position in my humble opinion is agnosticism as this leaves the door open for any discovery/revelation, and awaits conclusive proof one way or the other.
That article had a bit toooo much feeling attached to it IMO. The woman has emotional baggage (and I fully accept it was handed to her by the church) that was visible between the otherwise excellent logic, ergo, not completely balanced.
I don't care what people believe in, but I do care that religion impacts on political discourse, public policy and that it stunts the ability of people to think for themselves and question. And that it kills people and causes suffering. But most of all I care that the invisible electric fences that are wired in the minds of children brainwashed by religion are difficult to remove. And impossible if you don't even know they're there.
OK, good reasoning. I just don't much like the complete dismissal of every person who nurtures a belief in some sort of God as a total fool.While it's true that there are plenty of intelligent, educated people who have religious beliefs, it's also true that usually the more educated or intelligent you are - the more likely you are to abandon religion.
Your impression of a sense of atheistic intellectual superiority I think comes from the fact that most atheists you're exposed to are the vocal ones. They've gone through the PRATT's presented by religious people and had to put up with so much ignorance about basic concepts like evolution that it's hard not to feel like you're debating an inferior in some ways.
Australia is not "mostly secular". The latest census figures I can get my hands on (2006) state that well over 60% of Australians identify as Christians, not to mention any other religion. Maybe you just walk in more educated circles where the theists taper off?
But there's those words - "choose to believe"WayneL, I think you'll find that most atheists' thinking goes along the lines of "There's no evidence for a god, therefore I choose to believe there isn't one. Show me some hard evidence and I could well change my mind."
Hard evidence does NOT include what appears to be the face of Jesus in a toasted cheese sandwich or other such cases of pareidolia.
Agnostiticism is supposed to be the middle ground between atheism and thiesm although really, you either believe something or you don`t.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?