- Joined
- 26 March 2014
- Posts
- 20,101
- Reactions
- 12,714
If Tink were muslim, and I knew which sect/denomination of islam she was from, and that sect/denomination were guilty of the same things she's accused me of I would have said the same thing, Just replace the "Catholic Church" with which ever sect of islam she was from.
Not really the point.
You accuse the Catholic church of atrocities that happened centuries ago ,
And you are part of the Dawkins religion.....
Attacking muslims in general doesn't help,
I want to set Muslims free from the ideological chains that they have draped around them, and that means attacking what their religion does in their name. That's not attacking individuals but their religion. I see no problem with that.
Neither does attacking members of any other religion, in general.
You don't seem to see a difference between attacking individuals and attacking an evil ideology that they are coerced into believing.
I want to set Muslims free from the ideological chains that they have draped around them, and that means attacking what their religion does in their name.
That's not attacking individuals but their religion. I see no problem with that.
Interestingly humans are herd animals so it will always be so (unless evolutionary change) in some form or another. Obvious reasoning for this is the apparent safety in numbers. Takes courage to break away, self assess, free think and behave as a good quality person. There is nothing after thinking stops - no hell, no heaven but they are great tools to keep the faithful in the fold. You better believe it.I want to set Muslims free from the ideological chains that they have draped around them, and that means attacking what their religion does in their name. That's not attacking individuals but their religion. I see no problem with that.
If I bring up Christian sect in Africa burning witches and killing gays, People throw that example out because "Not all christians believe that", They are willing to judge each christian sect on its merits, but with muslims they put them all in one barrel.
Islam is a global threat to human rights and freedom and needs to be marginalised in this country.
If not for the "law of the land" we would see the below mentioned religious ideologies practiced here. Indeed there are attempts to practice and have been exposed. Probably going on right now somewhere in Aust., not yet exposed.Islam is a global threat to human rights and freedom and needs to be marginalised in this country.
If not for the "law of the land" we would see the below mentioned religious ideologies practiced here. Indeed there are attempts to practice and have been exposed. Probably going on right now somewhere in Aust., not yet exposed.
Religion needs to be starved, but the Paul Hanson style of bogan attacks on muslims feeds it.
when have I ever suggested pandering to islam.You don't starve anything by pandering it.
Exactly. If a religion permits atrocities then the religion has a problem.
Exactly. If a religion permits atrocities then the religion has a problem.
One Christian sect in Africa is not of the scale of whole countries that administer the atrocities of Islam.
Saudi Arabia, Iran, Indonesia, Malaysia, Somalia and so on and others like Turkey that are becoming increasingly hardline.
Islam is a global threat to human rights and freedom and needs to be marginalised in this country.
when have I ever suggested pandering to islam.
Yep, but again you (and most outraged westerners) lazily lump all the Islamic religions together as if they are one religion, while being happy to treat the many different christian religions as independent religions.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?