- Joined
- 31 January 2007
- Posts
- 411
- Reactions
- 0
Less quotes and more discussion would make this thread more interesting imo for an impoverished gumnut on a slow connection.
gg
For 20/20. Thank you for your comments. I give up; you're right and anyone who doesn't agree with your o-so-predictable views is 'wrong'.
You insist on using every topic as a vehicle for a cut and paste, anti-American polemic, and I for one have had enough. Bye!
PS For mine Fahrenheit 9/11 should be compulsory viewing for kids.
This is scary ...
...and given that there are school children that were taken out of school and marched by their teachers in anti-Iraq rallies in Australian cities, then there maybe school teachers that think along the same lines as you 20/20... if one can label that as "thinking"...
20/20...wanting to feed your anti-Americanism bulls#it to school kids... dangerous and disgraceful !!!
2020: please heed these comments. The endless quotes are mind numbingly boring.
As usual what starts out as a thread which promises to be quite interesting descends into the inevitable cut and paste from multiple and dubious sources, all aimed at supporting your own immovable opinions.
You are not interested in objective discussion, or considering whether an alternative opinion could have merit, but only in continually finding new avenues in which you can waffle on.
Who is 'everyone', other than ageing lefties who couldn't then and even now have never understood Vietnam? Fonda was a shallow exhibitionist who would have been hanged for her criminal stupidity in another time (as William Joyce AKA 'Lord Haw Haw' was after WWII).
This is the conventional wisdom which is, as usual, wrong. Ask the flourishing nations of Taiwan, South Korea, Malaysia, Singapore, Phillipines, Indonesia et al if the Domino Theory was 'wrong'. It was the US and allied engagement in Vietnam which allowed their fledgling market economies to develop without the expected Red stab in the back. How ironic that Vietnam is now moving the same way, but 40 years later.
Hindsight 20/20 said:
Well, you guessed wrongly. I was there and more than once in different capacities.
In the matter of McCain, you omitted the word 'alleged'. If it is true (and I have no way of knowing) I would set it within the known context.
McCain was singled out for 'special attention' because of his father's position. The severity of his beatings has left his arms permanently damaged.
I suggest, dear 20/20, that we both might have to experience something like that personally, before either of us passed judgement on another man's breaking point.
Meanwhile, the unlovely Jane Fonda (who, incidentally - but on the public record - had ribs removed to maintain her bulimia-acquired figure) was there voluntarily and (unfortunately) was never tortured.
Julia2020: please heed these comments. The endless quotes are mind numbingly boring.
As usual what starts out as a thread which promises to be quite interesting descends into the inevitable cut and paste from multiple and dubious sources, all aimed at supporting your own immovable opinions.
You are not interested in objective discussion, or considering whether an alternative opinion could have merit, but only in continually finding new avenues in which you can waffle on.
No thank you.But Julia try to read post #22
so JuliaNo thank you.
so Julia
can you watch youtubes or can't you?
and next question...
is there any point in my spending an hour or two typing the transcript of a youtube?...
that you can't (thank you) be bothered reading ...
I think what Julia is trying to say is that your opinions and comments are more interesting than a screed of quotes or utube links. Discussions rather than padding, the former gets drowned by the latter.
gg
gg, you (and Julia) are just gonna have to get broadband and listen to youtubes like that - Republicans calling McCain a very questionable moral character - then you'll understand that all this typing around the periphery of the argument is indeed "padding"
PS If I spend an hour typing the transcript of a youtube for your benefit gg - I don't really think you are legitimately entitled to criticise my efforts
2020, I have broadband.
I am simply not interested in watching endless videos which are usually extraneous to the discussion, and inevitably posted to mirror your own very unilateral view.
Who is 'everyone', other than ageing lefties who couldn't then and even now have never understood Vietnam? Fonda was a shallow exhibitionist who would have been hanged for her criminal stupidity in another time (as William Joyce AKA 'Lord Haw Haw' was after WWII).
This is the conventional wisdom which is, as usual, wrong. Ask the flourishing nations of Taiwan, South Korea, Malaysia, Singapore, Phillipines, Indonesia et al if the Domino Theory was 'wrong'. It was the US and allied engagement in Vietnam which allowed their fledgling market economies to develop without the expected Red stab in the back. How ironic that Vietnam is now moving the same way, but 40 years later.
okIf you want to ask people questions 20/20.. then on the last paragraph of this very correct post is this the "better understanding of the Vietnam situation" you talk about..? no u-tubes please...please !!
ok
a) we were told that unless we won the war in Vietnam there would be a domino to the next country and the next and so on.
b) we lost the war in vietnam
c) there was no domino follow on
d) the logic of the domino theory was incorrect.
PS we now go to Hanoi and/or Ho Chi Min City as businessmen and tourists, instead of soldiers - and that's after we lost the war - if you'd told someone that back in the 60's and early 70's they'd have said "impossible".
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?