This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Propaganda in movies and media


No way is collaboration with the enemy justified.
Then again I guess the 32 propaganda tapes that McCain made for the Vietnam Govt (whilst a POW) would have to be the classic point in question on that score.
(according to this youtube, - already posted on the McCain thread)

ahh , McCain you've done it again - 32 times


then again , maybe his life was threatened - shouldn't be too tough on him I guess.
PS try getting him to admit it
 
Here's a transcript of that youtube
For gg's benefit since he can't listen to youtubes apparently..
Note the direct comparison with Jane Fonda at the halfway mark. ..


There's that direct comparison between McCain and Jane Fonda

 
So my question to you superfly - and gg I guess...
do you or do you not support the actions of McCain in making those 32 propaganda tapes ?

Dr James Lucier Former US Senate Chief of Staff
What we do know is that when he was there he cooperated with the communist news services in giving interviews that were not flattering to the United States

 
So my question to you superfly - and gg I guess...
do you or do you not support the actions of McCain in making those 32 propaganda tapes ?

I'd prefer not to comment any further rather than to say that he was a POW and she was the spoiled daughter of Hollywood royalty.

We all make our own choices in life, he made his and she hers.

gg
 
Back to that definition..
1. probably ignore Ayn Rand's definition - i.e. that only the Communists use propaganda etc - since the days of the McCarthy era , I'd say it's pretty universal

2, in fact it's getting pretty hard to hear many pollies (most pollies) say anything that isn't tainted with spin and propaganda (imo)
- moving on

3. dictionary :- http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/propaganda
propaganda
"Official government communications to the public that are designed to influence opinion. The information may be true or false, but it is always carefully selected for its political effect"

4. I guess I was assuming that propaganda had to be deceitful - if not by error then by omission.
(as they say , it's a lie to say that a lie by omission is not a lie)

5. by incorrect emphasis
but then it merges into
spin, etc

6. careful crafting of words
- to the extent that the words can only be said one way - and when the politician (or company director or whoever) is further questioned, they stick to that single turn of phrase because their truth is built on sand.

7. quick poem might explain what I'm thinking
https://www.aussiestockforums.com/forums/showthread.php?p=294358&highlight=omission#post294358
 
At the time I guess she believed what she was doing
- she just happened to be ahead of her time, since these days everyone has come to better understand the Vietnam situation.

Who is 'everyone', other than ageing lefties who couldn't then and even now have never understood Vietnam? Fonda was a shallow exhibitionist who would have been hanged for her criminal stupidity in another time (as William Joyce AKA 'Lord Haw Haw' was after WWII).

The "Domino theory" (which we all believed at the time - indoctrinated as we were) was completely false obviously.

This is the conventional wisdom which is, as usual, wrong. Ask the flourishing nations of Taiwan, South Korea, Malaysia, Singapore, Phillipines, Indonesia et al if the Domino Theory was 'wrong'. It was the US and allied engagement in Vietnam which allowed their fledgling market economies to develop without the expected Red stab in the back. How ironic that Vietnam is now moving the same way, but 40 years later.
 
Pronto, You think only "oldies" think we've changed our thoughts about Vietnam?
Assuming you weren't there , I'm guessing you're guessing.

Guess I have to ask you too Pronto (along with Superfly) - what do you think of McCain doing a stack (32+) of propoganda tapes for the Communist Vietnamese Govt. (?)
 
Changing tack somewhat ...

"Burnt By the Sun" - brilliant movie imo, - how they got away with it ??
Maybe it qualifies as propaganda, I'd say not - but it gets a massive amount of messages across ( imo)

a) it's full of brilliant imagery / allegory, serious villainy, Stalin out of control etc.

b) some half-humourous old man driving all over Russia lost and confused - representing the people

c) hot air balloons lifting massive pictures of Stalin into the Russian countryside

d) it is delightfully critical of Stalin's Russia - yet it was made in Russia.
Best Foreign Film 1994 (Academy Awards) etc.


Nikita Mikalkov produces – also plays the part of the Colonel – his daughter is his daughter in real life – top scenes together

http://www.sonypictures.com/classics/burntbysun/misc/interview.html
Nikita & Nadia Mihalkov - father and daughter - a happy Russia

the ugly side of Stalinist Russia, after the the colonel says goodbye to his daughter and is "escorted" away by the secret police.

a recent pisstake featuring Putin
 
Hindsight 20/20 said:

Well, you guessed wrongly. I was there and more than once in different capacities.

In the matter of McCain, you omitted the word 'alleged'. If it is true (and I have no way of knowing) I would set it within the known context.

McCain was singled out for 'special attention' because of his father's position. The severity of his beatings has left his arms permanently damaged.

I suggest, dear 20/20, that we both might have to experience something like that personally, before either of us passed judgement on another man's breaking point.

Meanwhile, the unlovely Jane Fonda (who, incidentally - but on the public record - had ribs removed to maintain her bulimia-acquired figure) was there voluntarily and (unfortunately) was never tortured.
 
Less quotes and more discussion would make this thread more interesting imo for an impoverished gumnut on a slow connection.

gg
 

Couldn't agree more

gg
 
1. hey I'm not an apologist for Jane Fonda (nor an expert on her activities)
I just say that in the capacity that she believed we shouldn't be in Vietnam - she was ahead of her time.
I've already stated categorically that I don't condone collaboration with the enemy.


2. but I guess she's as good an example of "propaganda" as any. So let's push on with the exercise (i.e. as an example)

For instance the quote above is apparently distriuted by emails etc ...

Wikipedia has this to say ...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jane_Fonda


Maybe that email whatever is incorrect?

I also notice she helped Vietnam Veterans (albeit in 1970)


on the subject of her prior support for Huey Newton and the Black Panthers, she said :-

Likewise she apparently expressed concern that her trip was manipulated - and also of regret (even sounds like she's disowned that photograph ) ....


Pronto said:
3. Well, you guessed wrongly. I was there and more than once in different capacities.

4. In the matter of McCain, you omitted the word 'alleged'. If it is true (and I have no way of knowing) I would set it within the known context.

3. Fair enough , you were there, I stand corrected on that. And you still say we haven't changed our opinion of North Vietnam's expansion plans etc?

Personally, during Vietnam days I was too busy learning the Army's arguments of why we were there - both for my own intersts and how to explain it to other soldiers. Have the ideas that were being bandied around then changed today? Personally I'd say emphatic yes. But no biggie. I suggest we can agree to disagree (rather than have what appears to be a pointless argument).

4. If I omitted the word alleged, it's because that youtube also omitted the word alleged. I was quoting from it - in the words of ...

a) Dr James Lucier Former US Senate Chief of Staff
and
b) Tracey Usry fmr Chief Investigator , US Senate Minority Staff

... the people who also accuse him of singlehandedly covering up the facts of what really happened over there, and preventing release of knowledge about other patriotic americans POW / MIA etc who were not lucky enough to return.

PS and incidentally, "alleging" that this denial to others - other widows etc - was all about his self interest...


There's that direct comparison between McCain and Jane Fonda
continuing ...

 
Jane Fonda (who, incidentally - but on the public record - had ribs removed to maintain her bulimia-acquired figure) ....

http://www.snopes.com/horrors/vanities/ribs.asp

Pronto ... As for the rib removal, snopes.com would suggest that its false. It's my guess that much like Superfly's story about Fonda passing over the secret notes to the Vietnamese jailers... that it's all designed to achieve "an emotional rather than rational response to the information presented" - but I'm only quoting snopes.com ok

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Propaganda
 

Attachments

  • getting waisted.jpg
    90.2 KB · Views: 72
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Propaganda

"The 20th century has been characterized by three developments of great political importance:

a) the growth of democracy,
b) the growth of corporate power, and
c) the growth of corporate propaganda as a means of protecting corporate power against democracy."[6][7]

from this book :-

Thank God for the ABC
 

2020 I heard from my barber that she (Hanoi Jane) was waisted and thats good enough for me, it has to be true.

And that is no propoganda as he has a Barbarella poster.


gg
 
... I heard from my barber that she (Hanoi Jane) was waisted and thats good enough for me, it has to be true.
My barber's name is Ali - and he charges like 40 thieves and all.

PS If you (or your wife lol) want a figure like Jane Fonda - sorry , there's no option but hard work

PS according to that snopes.com website, the rumour (against several women with small waists) could possibly have been started by more portly women, possibly jealous, who wish to paint them as...

"Frankenstein creations , rather than acknowledging that even members of the charmed circle have to do situps and watch what they eat. Female celebrities turned exercise mavens - like Cher and Jane Fonda - are especial targets for rumours of this kind because they're seen as committing the unforgivable crime of condescension.

Not only are they rich famous and good-looking, they're now out to lecture the rest of us! In those cases, our urge to see the pedestal pulled out from under them runs strong"
 

PS I'll definitely concede he went through hell at the hands of the Vietnamese - but also partly because he broke his arm in three places when he ejected from his plane after being hit by a missile (as well as his leg broken).

And they withheld medical treatment until he gave "information" etc

and subsequently made false confessions etc.

I'm guessing I would have broken well before him.

Just that, when I returned, I wouldn't have prevented others finding out about their loved ones who were POWs and MIAs etc, (which is the real mystery - totally unexpainable yes?) or about my treatment either.
 
For 20/20. Thank you for your comments. I give up; you're right and anyone who doesn't agree with your o-so-predictable views is 'wrong'.

You insist on using every topic as a vehicle for a cut and paste, anti-American polemic, and I for one have had enough. Bye!
 
For 20/20. Thank you for your comments. I give up; you're right and anyone who doesn't agree with your o-so-predictable views is 'wrong'.

My views predictable?

If you're talking about Jane Fonda having ribs removed, - (and other urban myths) - you are free to continue to believe what you like. As Cher says, "er - maybe common sense would suggest that if I had a rib removed I would have some scars right?" - (other than boob-job scars) - needless to say she then took great delight in displaying her body etc. Same reasoning would go for Jane Fonda I guess.

If you're talking about McCain - hey I started the McCain thread with an open mind -
then I came upon a few points that I didn't much like, marital infidelity, ordering armaments / ships etc against the president's wishes and behind his back -

then I came upon that youtube (post#21) which I found bludy weird... POWs MIA etc.

pronto said:
You insist on using every topic as a vehicle for a cut and paste, anti-American polemic, and I for one have had enough. Bye!

And if you're talking about post #22 - the transcript of that youtube, - no I didn't cut and paste it, I typed it.

PS If you're interested in my political views, I 'd probably say that Nick Greiner was the best Premier NSW ever had
and I've voted non-Liberal twice (maybe 3 times) as I recall

PS my mum - in her nineties - still can't get over why Joh still isn't Qld Premier - the sun shone out him (iho). btw , the photo is Cher - not my mum .
 

Attachments

  • cher.jpg
    24.6 KB · Views: 105
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more...