- Joined
- 2 June 2011
- Posts
- 5,341
- Reactions
- 242
I think this to myself so often. Personally, I am in the firm belief that companies should be far more focused on optimising their capital structure and use of funds rather than focusing on sticking to one path (the dividend consistency path at any cost) in order to please a subset of investors who are in it for a return of capital. I guess it's heavily to do with the franking credit system we have in place..
It might also have something to do with making their cost of capital as low as possible. I do agree with the principle but I sometimes wonder if, as a shareholder, when one advocates these things they're not cutting off their nose to spite their face. I wonder if there's any research out there about the cost of equity for dividend v non-dividend paying companies that are otherwise in similar financial situations.