Good question, got me thinking actually. Like Homer, I was a bit dozed off.Where is price growth going to come from then, if there is no marginally higher bidder? (aka financed)
Absolutely , Good question.The question stands.
Where is price growth going to come from then, if there is no marginally higher bidder? (aka financed)
There wont be any real price growth, over the next few years. IMO
No it will be quite a while before anything starts moving. IMO
Good question, got me thinking actually. Like Homer, I was a bit dozed off.
I was thinking more in terms of containing the situation so that people can still hold onto the assets bought with debt. The thread is about property so let's say holding onto homes and investment prop's. That may be possible paying almost nothing on the principal at current interest rates. You can stay on top of the repayments even on the dole (Centrelink) combined with a side hustle a few hours a week at the moment, so my point stands.
The point that woke me up from my doze-off is when you mentioned growth ! I have no idea where that is going to come from, unless RBA pushes interest rates below zero. I'll be a net borrower in that case, perhaps go deep, a few mil in debt to earn the -ve interest that is payable to borrowers.
Thanks for the wake up call. Likes given.
Yes my apologies, wrong thread.
I agree, but price rarely stays stable. If no growth then the prudent bet is contraction.
I think quite a good fundamental bear case is in place and that over the next few years waiting for the low will be the smart move. IMO jumping in now, despite the fact that Scomo may have generated a bounce here, is being a little too keen. JMO, DYODD etc...
Wow! You can't buy a dog-house to live in for that price in Melb/Syd. So your view is valid IMO. I'd be interested in property at the matrix you mentioned.I think that may be the case in Sydney and Melbourne, but if you take for example Perth, prices are back to a point where 2-3 years wages buys a property in a reasonable suburb.
It is getting to the point, where you can buy a 3x1 rental for $200k and get $300 P/W rent no problem.
I think you are probably correct.Anyway... I'm probably wrong, so don't worry.
That is the whole problem, all the news is Sydney/Melbourne specific, but the collateral damage in other areas is massive.Wow! You can't buy a dog-house to live in for that price in Melb/Syd. So your view is valid IMO.
I think that may be the case in Sydney and Melbourne, but if you take for example Perth, prices are back to a point where 2-3 years wages buys a property in a reasonable suburb.
It is getting to the point, where you can buy a 3x1 rental for $200k and get $300 P/W rent no problem.
Yes, I'd be interested in property at the prices/yield you mentioned.That is the whole problem, all the news is Sydney/Melbourne specific, but the collateral damage in other areas is massive.
On t.v and in the newspapers, it doesn't tend to emphasis that the problem with prices is Sydney/Melbourne specific, they generalise and the other markets react accordingly.
I never wanted to get back into RE investment, as I'm retired and can't be bothered, however the returns are becoming compelling. IMO
I never wanted to get back into RE investment, as I'm retired and can't be bothered, however the returns are becoming compelling. IMO
Nice chart, but since the 2007 GFC dip, it has gone exponentially up. So I think a long period of consolidation as you mentioned is likely.This an old graph but illustrates the sideways prices.
So I think a long period of consolidation as you mentioned is likely.
And houses not units.I think that is quite probably best case, we should end up looking like Perth at the least. JMO.
Hello and welcome to Aussie Stock Forums!
To gain full access you must register. Registration is free and takes only a few seconds to complete.
Already a member? Log in here.