- Joined
- 17 January 2007
- Posts
- 2,986
- Reactions
- 32
Oil price collapsing has nothing to do with shale oil, economy or recession. This is a repeat of the 1980s when the USSR collapsed it is to starve the Russian economy by the scumbag western governments supported and agreed with king of terror and king of human rights abuser saudia arabia.
It is also aimed at Iran to try and tame them from getting nuclear.
What will happen?
* Smaller countries that produce Oil and rely on Oil will soon starve if price stays this level or drops more.
* One side of the world will give in and in 3-4 months oil will be back up again
In other news oil has been its lowest since 4-5 years but in aus we are still paying $1.30 +p/l work that one out.
Do you think that the US would be part of a scheme that would jeopardise their new found oil independence
I would question that from a military perspective. If they were easy to bowl over the US would have done that.
Check out "zero hedge" for a week or two.
A superpower is a state with a dominant position in international relations and is characterised by its unparalleled ability to exert influence or project power on a global scale. This is done through the means of both military and economic strength, as well as diplomatic and soft power influence. Traditionally, superpowers are preeminent among the great powers
The plan would be to squeeze U.S. shale oil producers out of the market. The growth of production in U.S. has been strong but the cost for exploration, development and ongoing production is getting prohibitive now according to some sources. $40 - $60 according to this 16th Oct. 2014 article. I new of an oil shale extraction plant in Queensland that has started up and shut down a few times due to environmental issues and extraction process costs. A demonstration plant is the most recent attempt to continue down this path using the Paraho 2 extraction process.One thing we can be pretty sure of is that Saudi Arabia/OPEC and all other oil producers will act in whatever way brings in the most money. OPEC/Saudi Arabia have deliberately allowed prices to fall. It may not be quite as easy as it used to be for them to manipulate prices, but they certainly still could if they wanted to, and they have chosen not to.
It would take a drop in crude prices to about $50 a barrel before U.S. oil production growth would be choked off.
That's the finding in a new report from Citigroup energy analysts. They said the two-year low in U.S. oil prices is not yet stalling growth of U.S. crude production, and even at $70 per barrel, the industry would continue to increase production.
It would have to fall to $50 or even lower, to fully halt shale production growth, the report said. At a level of $40 to $60 a barrel, production growth would fall toward zero as producers shut less productive wells. Citi said, in fact, this break-even price could get lower over time as producers focused on more intensive drilling in more productive areas. http://www.cnbc.com/id/102094881#.
Oil is back on the rise.
Markets, particularly the DOW were looking shakey so oil will save the day and the DOW could even hit 20,000 in the next run. Yeehaaaar.
Just my very humble opinion of course. DYOR
Oil has finally had its first decent short covering rally....a good start, but one rally makes not a bull market mate!
This is a week by week of the month analysis since June.
1st week: -2, 0, -3, -3, -1, -5, -5 = -19
2nd week: -3, -2, -1, -10, -6, -7, 0 = -29
3rd week: +2, -2, -2, +1, 0, +1 = 0
4th week: -1, +1, +2, -1, -3, -4 = -6
5th week: -5, +1, -3, -3, -2, -1 = -13
(5th week is partial)
Days 29th to 14th has seen oil drop $61
Days 15th to 28th has seen oil drop $6
Oil has finally had its first decent short covering rally....a good start, but one rally makes not a bull market mate!
Do ya reckon this current action is also short covering, well it might be for me tomorrowBut a spike in gold and a spike in oil and everything else getting f#$%ed.
Got me wondering what's going to hit next?
View attachment 61141
Maybe Poo Poo has plans. (Putin)
The link between energy and real economic growth (as distinct from speculation etc which doesn't actually produce real wealth and which would appear to consume little energy) is fairly solid. There will be efficiency improvements over time, but if we make more things then ultimately we'll be using more materials to do it.
Also there's a huge paradox with efficiency. Install a heat pump for heating and then people leave it running 24/7 (very common in practice). Switch to energy saving lights, then they get left on a lot more than the old lights were. Double the efficiency of an engine, then consumers and car manufacturers will decide to (a) have engines twice as big (b) have more cars and (c) drive their cars further. That's pretty much the lesson of history - resource consumption goes up despite improvements in efficiency. Look what happened when TV's became more efficient. Use 30% less energy for the same size screen maybe, but when you end up with a screen that's 3 times as big that's still a doubling of energy consumption and that's exactly what has to a large extent happened.
The link between oil and economic activity isn't absolute, but since oil fuels most transport it's pretty strong. Make more things and they'll need to be transported which will use oil.
As for what happens with China, that's going to be interesting to say the least. But I do note that even the more extreme optimists aren't predicting a doubling of oil production as would be necessary if China were to attain US per capita oil consumption levels.
I do note however that China has a key advantage in that whilst they are urbanising and developing, they are doing so in a world where oil isn't overly cheap and (presumably) in the knowledge that problems likely lie ahead. They're building an economy that works with $80+ oil whereas the USA (as the largest but not only example) has an economy based upon $20 oil. That pattern of development, plus China's very heavy reliance on coal and to some extent hydro for their non-transport energy, is very much in China's favour. The US is in economic trouble with oil at $80 whereas it would need to be somewhat higher to meaningfully hurt China.
In terms of physical supply, with China doing deals with Saudi Arabia, Venezuela etc they are certainly taking steps to secure supplies. Such action, effectively taking oil off freely traded spot markets and locking it up under long term deals, pushes the rest of the world further down the "no oil at any price" track that has already been mentioned. That's the scary bit, and that's what seems to be actually happening.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?