Sean K
Moderator
- Joined
- 21 April 2006
- Posts
- 22,295
- Reactions
- 11,564
Back on 4/2/23 "15 Trading View Analysts" had a Target Price of $29.70 - and that is considered very conservative.
So with the normal Argy-Bargy that the NCM Board must employ, they should be looking @ $35-00+ - and thats just a quick Rule of Thumb on my behalf.
View attachment 152671
That looks only around $27.50 aud they're offering in scrip?
NEM (usd) x .38 (offer) x 1.45 (aud)
50 x .38 x 1.45
A hallmark of Newcrest’s challenging management culture in recent years has been a marked reliance on external consultants. Chief among these was McKinsey, whose wonks have lately been involved in everything from mine operations to data science initiatives, and whose research is cited in Newcrest’s sustainability and diversity reports as well as then-CEO Sandeep Biswas′ speeches to external bodies.
A Newcrest spokesman on Monday defended its use of consultants, which he said occurred “at appropriate times”. He also dismissed claims of a $500 million spend on external advice over the course of Biswas’ nine-year tenure at the company, calling it a “gross exaggeration” that is “orders of magnitude wrong” (Biswas abruptly left the company last December – search firm Russell Reynolds is hunting for his replacement.)
This newspaper has previously written that the company’s heavy use of external consultants had left many employees feeling “bypassed, not trusted, undermined, superfluous and ultimately insecure in their jobs”. It also noted that the company uses the McKinsey-owned and operated Organisational Health Index to gauge employee sentiment on its culture. Which, if nothing else, is utterly ironic.
It's one thing when an explorer or a small biotech hopefull gets taken over by a local blue chip or a foreign entity, but when the top tier stocks with the country's assets get taken over and removed from the asx, what do we have here ?
Just a bunch of 4-legged banks that the govt wouldn't let go due to vested interest (all that 4-pillar chitchat) and a gambler's playground of mining and biotech specs that does hardly anything but waste investor money with round after round of capital raisings. Anything of value that holds cash producing assets will either be privately owned by Gina or foreign owned.
I agree @aus_traderIt's one thing when an explorer or a small biotech hopefull gets taken over by a local blue chip or a foreign entity, but when the top tier stocks with the country's assets get taken over and removed from the asx, what do we have here ?
Just a bunch of 4-legged banks that the govt wouldn't let go due to vested interest (all that 4-pillar chitchat) and a gambler's playground of mining and biotech specs that does hardly anything but waste investor money with round after round of capital raisings. Anything of value that holds cash producing assets will either be privately owned by Gina or foreign owned.
Just Reposting the Data Entry Snapshot from my last post (above).I made a few quick calculations yesterday on just what the Newmont offer should look like, so Just ran my Slide Rule over NCM - Results are below for anyone that's interested.
Data Entry used in this Calculation.
View attachment 152734
That above date produces the following Analysis.
View attachment 152738
View attachment 152736
and next is the Chart - also showing the Trading View Analysts Calculations.
View attachment 152737
My Target Price @ $35.38 is slightly Higher than the TradingView Experts - that just means that they are WRONG and I am RIGHT.
Cheers....
DrB
Hi finicky - I'll do better next time - OK?^^^
More detail please
Pretty sloppy really. We used to delete ramps with no data backing them up.^^^
More detail please
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?