- Joined
- 5 June 2012
- Posts
- 65
- Reactions
- 0
At the risk of being pedantic, it would be more correct to say it would have lost 50% of its price rather than value.
This stock has low ROE, low EPS growth and therefore little reason to justify even its current PE of 17 - a value of $12 would be more appropriate. The price fall over the past 5 years reflects PE contraction as the EPS has stagnated.
I would back the shorters on this one!
This stock has low ROE, low EPS growth and therefore little reason to justify even its current PE of 17 - a value of $12 would be more appropriate. The price fall over the past 5 years reflects PE contraction as the EPS has stagnated.
I would back the shorters on this one!