- Joined
- 2 September 2008
- Posts
- 1,038
- Reactions
- 1
I dont really get the whole "position trade" argument,
-ie. sell initial capital and have a free ride.
sure you can tell yourself that it is 'won' money, but it is still YOUR money. and if you lose it.. you still lose it.
there is an expectancy when you decide to sell off the initial stake, and by keeping the stake/or selling off some, you're hurting you're overall gain in the longrun.
you're just selling/not selling yourself out of $$$.
Not really
You buy 100 $5 shares ($500)
They go to $10 each ($1000)
You sell off 50 shares @ $10 each and get your $500 back
You now have 50 shares and your initial capital back to trade aonther lot of shares
You are not understanding that you are lowering your risk. Even though the potential profit is smaller, your risk is 0. If the shares fall back to $5 you get 10*50 + 5*50 = $750. If you are holding the whole lot and they fall back to $5 you get 100*50 = $500. (of course they would't go all the way back because you'd be using a stop... but you are still in front if you sell half your position).
Think about it like this. Would you argue pyramiding positions is bad? By your argument you'd say it's not good because the potential profit is larger if you don't pyramid and instead you just buy the whole position in one lot. But with pyramiding the risk is alot lower.
Ideally, you want to be trading with the lowest risk for the highest reward. If you sell half your position, you achive that.
Brad