- Joined
- 12 September 2004
- Posts
- 1,714
- Reactions
- 1
Re: MBL - Macquarie Bank
Reece, you've made some good points throughout this thread but the last paragraph sounds a little bitter. I wont speculate upon the resoans for this, although I am a little curious - are you hoping for an Enron style meltdown?
I can certainly see an impact on figures due to global credit tightening but a collapse is (pardon the pun) not on the cards.
Not safe from harm... safe from an Enron type meltdown, as implied by posts above.Hrmm.... the parent Company would be safe from harm if the asset bubble affected their sattelite funds..... Lets have a think about that....
I doubt losing 1/3 of net profit would be enough to cause a financial meltdown in the majority of listed companies - MBL have one of the highest contract to fulltime ratios in the country, so have a higher degree of flexibility on overheads than many of their contempories.1. Revenue impact - Revenue from fee and consulting commissions to associates and JV's for 2007 was over 1 Billion. Lets say that costs associated with such advisory was half (500 Mil). If their fee income was gone from associates, that would be 1/3 of net profit - sounds fairly material to me.....
So their recent raising of capital just prior to a global tightening of credit is another tick in the box of intelligent timing.2. Asset impariment - Net assets are 7.5 Bil, investments in associates 4 Bil - I think an impairment here would greatly affect their collateral.
It is about both - less regulation and an increase in asset protection. Lumping MBL with the profiles of largely unregulated hedge funds & private equity firms seems a little unfair (and over the top) when you consider the difference in approach both to raising capital, internal risk policies & history of reporting.Everyone needs to have a good look at what MBL actually is - the biggest deck of cards on the ASX. The Company restructure is not about asset protection, it's about getting around the Capital requirements of having banking licence for the investment banks head Company. It will actually increase risk, because the prudential requirements won't hold them back ....
In saying all this however, MBL have lasted this long ripping everyone off with their spin outs, so perhaps if the bank roll continues, everything will be ok..... I've heard this story before......
Reece, you've made some good points throughout this thread but the last paragraph sounds a little bitter. I wont speculate upon the resoans for this, although I am a little curious - are you hoping for an Enron style meltdown?
I can certainly see an impact on figures due to global credit tightening but a collapse is (pardon the pun) not on the cards.