- Joined
- 28 March 2006
- Posts
- 3,566
- Reactions
- 1,309
And another mob of child abusers escape free of any responsibility in the name of religion.
Joe public would get 20 years but if you have a collar its ok apparently
http://www.independent.ie/national-...o-pay-a-penny-towards-ryan-plans-1844681.html
Ah yes , the lord does work in mysterious ways, and of course this is just a test of the fathers faith and he passed with flying colours. How dare the prosecuters want him jailed, if anything for his strong faith he should be rewarded. The hide of the judge believing he should have obtained medical help when we all know prayer is more than enough. !!!!!!!
So weren't they doing what most people do, i.e. having a bet both ways?The father of the girl will probably believe 'The Lord is now holding her hand in glory', or some similar rubbish.
A few weeks ago I saw a religious couple say something similar on a TV show about some strange religious mob in the US.
Their daughter had Leukaemia. The parents were getting treatment for her and were hopeful she'd recover her health. But they also said 'If the Lord chooses to hold her hand in glory, then we're OK with that too'.They were of course talking about the possibility of their daughter dying.
At least they had the intelligence to get medical treatment for her, rather than rely on prayer.
The father of the girl will probably believe 'The Lord is now holding her hand in glory', or some similar rubbish.
A few weeks ago I saw a religious couple say something similar on a TV show about some strange religious mob in the US.
Their daughter had Leukaemia. The parents were getting treatment for her and were hopeful she'd recover her health. But they also said 'If the Lord chooses to hold her hand in glory, then we're OK with that too'.They were of course talking about the possibility of their daughter dying.
At least they had the intelligence to get medical treatment for her, rather than rely on prayer.
I saw that program as well - it was based on the Mormons in the US.
You are being extremely harsh Bunyip. You are skewing the facts of a story to suit the topic thread.
I saw that program as well - it was based on the Mormons in the US.
It was girl was only about 5-6. The family did everything they could to raise the funds for the necessary treatment (and by the way the money was raised primarily through friends, family and their local congregation). At no stage did they contemplate not having the treatment. It was obviously an extremely difficult and emotional time for the family and as a viewer I felt great sorrow for the little girl.
However the family remained strong, positive and encouraged - primarily and presumably through their faith and close support network. I am no expert but I would think strong, positive and encouraged would be three things most health workers would like patients and their families to be when fighting cancer.
They were being optimistic but at the same time being realistic about her chances. If being a religious nut means that after you have done all that you can medically for your cancerous 5 year old girl you are able to take some comfort, and find some sense and purpose in having your daughter tragically taken away from you - then good luck to them. I'm all for those types of religious nuts.
It appears that on reaching Post #628 of this thread topic, it has got to the stage where a Religious Nut can be official defined. It is someone that uses the phrase "The Lord is holding her hand in glory", rather than "She will be at peace and suffer no more". How dare they use language that is so offensive to your ideas and beliefs Bunyip.
Duckman
Any one see 4 corners last night, all done in the name of religion, what hope have we got when you have nut cases like that running around.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?