This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

More Religious Nuts

Perhaps one day you can ask him.

Good post Wayne, good to see some actual reasoning.
see weird , YOU claimed that the church has sound scientific backing - believes in evolution I believe you said - or tolerates it whatever. ...

so what do you suggest that the church should do about it's scientific credentials, considering it took almost 400 years to "forgive" Galileo.
 

Scientific backing ... no such claim, it has been called faith all along.

I am about to duck out, so won't be able to respond for abit, and saying this off the cuff, and I could be wrong,

but my current understanding is that the Jesuit's put Galileo comfortably under house arrest, with complete access to all scientific equipment, and Galileo was heavily under attack by Protestants at the time.

I completely respect Protestants , their historical research into the old and new testament, by historical scholars (not the self-serving morning crew most people scorn, but actual research) has been useful to all.
 
BTW

The Big Bang was originally proposed by.... a catholic priest.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georges_Lemaître

::
 
BTW, while researching this, here's a nice little spray that could neatly cross over into a number of theories, with little modification.

Open minds folks.

 
Indeed. Sane thinking, Cartman, not confused at all.




well if you go to the youtube, you'll see these details given



....
2020 why is it so damn difficult for you to simply accede to the request to give a brief description of the content of your interminable videos, rather than forcing anyone with a possible mild interest to actually have to start playing them? Just a single sentence would suffice.
 
Is it just me or have we completely LOST our way? This has turned into a debate over ecumenical matters and those who opppose their POV. With links to youtube thrown in (guilty myself but mine was of camp Jesus being hit by a bus) so can we please get back onto reporting about RELIGIOUS NUT JOBS?

Like this bloke: Man beat daughter over church refusal, court told 1:26PM Thursday Jul 09, 2009

A 55-year-old man who beat his daughter over the head with a lump of concrete when she refused to go to his Mormon church "does not understand what all the fuss is about", Hastings District Court has heard. Uluia Muliipu appeared in court after pleading guilty to one count of assault with intent to injure. Judge Geoff Rea said on February 22 this year Muliipu had become involved in an argument with his daughter who refused to attend church.

He chased her down the street and back into the house picking up a lump of concrete along the way. He then whacked her over the head in a bedroom with the concrete causing skin on her head to split and start bleeding.

They were both "covered in blood" and he kicked her in the face causing bruising. "When police arrived you told them your daughter was lucky you did not kill her," Judge Rea said. He took his shirt off and ran into the laundry where he attempted to rinse the blood out of the shirt. When told by police to desist he continued rinsing the shirt and blocking their way before he was pepper sprayed.

His daughter was taken to Hawke's Bay Hospital with head injuries. Defence lawyer Roger Stone told the court Muliipu had been angry his daughter refused to go to church. He had been under stress before the incident.

He was a "proud" man who was "disappointed" his daughter had elected not to follow his Mormon faith. Mr Stone said blood on Muliipu's shirt came from him hugging his daughter just before police arrived at his house.

Judge Rea said a probation officer's report made "grim reading" because he "still does not understand what all the fuss is about".

He had been ejected from an anger management course because of his views and had an inability to understand "whacking someone on the head is unacceptable". In the circumstances there was only one response and that was imprisonment. Muliipu was sentenced to 12 months in jail.

Now this may be a case of ugly parent syndrome when daughter decides she doesn't want to go to church with Daddy BUT .... never mind.
 

in reverse order ...
4. inability to understand violence unacceptable
3. inability to understand that blatant lies - it was from hugging her - only compound the "sin" - (PS for "sin", read "criminally devious mind")
2. proud of himself - based on his idea of his christian morals no doubt
1. no doubt he'd criticise the Moslem practice of stoning people to death. (equally barbaric of course - doh).

There's an old fairly sick joke ... "Let he who is without sin cast the first stone " .. "thud" ... " sometimes Mother dear .." etc. An oldie and not very goodie.

I'm reminded of a Mormon boy who killed his father (with some justification as I recall - physical abuse etc - but the boy sounded like a problem child) . Anyway the sentencing judge made him enlist for 3 years missionary work ! - lol - "go forth, boy, spread the good word to the ignorant masses overseas - like in Australia for instance!!"

We had Mormon missionaries come by our house a few times when I was a boy , "poaching" christians from other christian "clubs". (Mum was fairly religious, and too polite to tell them to go jump). Anyway, we soon tired of the nonsense - and I'm sure they'd be more use in Africa or India - I always thought of missionaries as people out there doing good stuff - felt like telling them to go follow the footsteps of Mother Teresa - you get a better CV and a better hearing at the Pearly Gates I'm sure.
Try going to a place that doesn't have a MacDonalds on every second corner...
yeah right.
 
As for this next article, authenticity unknown ... probably true you'd have to say.
Bludy gruesome yarn , Man cuts out daughter's tongue , then burns her to death ... etc (for becoming a christian)


But of course you could then go on to talk about Jonestown etc etc
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jonestown


Jonestown would have to be the perfect example of man's weakness for this stuff, no doubt arising from some deep insecurity possibly about death - and also his vulnerability to mass hypnosis.

Like the Moonies ... ahh heck, lol the list is too long. My wife met some Moonies in San Fran when she was travelling way back when - the 70's. They invited them (she and a girlfriend) back to some commune with view to indoctrination - they were amazed at the trance-like state the rest of them were in ... she never forgets "the sheep farmer from NZ" lol - sitting there crosslegged, bleating like a sick sheep, - with her friend - a Kiwi nurse - great bird lol , funny as - trying to click her fingers in front of his eyes and making loud noises to try to wake him out of it lol.
 

Yes, these discussions always end up drifting away from the topic of the thread, and we'll all guilty of doing it.

That's why I put up a new thread titled 'All Things Religious'...at least in there we can discuss any matter at all relating to religion, without getting off topic.
 
Another tragic, tragic story of religious nuts. This time an 11 year-old girl dies for her parents' misguided beliefs.

Mother of dead girl: sickness was test of faith


The mother of an 11-year-old girl who died of undiagnosed diabetes as the family prayed for her to get better has testified that she believes sickness is caused by sin and can be cured by God...
"I asked her if she loved Jesus," the mother testified. "She might have said yes. I know for sure she was acknowledging it. What sounds came out, I don't remember. She was making noises ... My focus definitely was to pray."
 
tragic all right Timmy. - Wisconsin bit of a worry you'd have to say
she didn't take the girl to a doctor because that would have been "complete disobedience to what we believe".

PS Ancient Greek Sylligism....“From nothing, nothing comes; Something is, therefore something eternally was”
 

I wonder if these sort of people ever learn from their stupidity, or whether their views remain largely unchanged. Quite likely the latter.
Not much different really, to Jehovah's Witnesses who will let a loved one bleed to death rather than authorise a life-saving blood transfusion.
 
It would certainly test my sense of faith (If I had any) They would reason that it was Gods will and she/he is in a better place blah blah and BLAH. I thought they locked people up under the mental health act when you have an imaginary friend?
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more...