54 years of corruption might just be enough. The 1% of GDP is Lynas revenue. No tax is payed for 12 years, no direct benefit to the people but severe risks. IAEA is a nuke-lobby organisation and polls and protests are for real. It's just one possibility and you might be right, but I just wouldn't bet on it because a 1-2 year delay can mean that Lynas will never be able to operate profitable.
This applies to all explorers, but to my knowledge Lynas is the first one
with a market cap of over 3 billion $.
Somebody said they can sell a product now. That's right. They can sell ore from Mt. Weld. The stuff with the highly advertised basked prices that has caused the hype is still a long way to go. 1 year in best case, 2-3 years likely and possible if the license has to wait until after elections and even 4-5 years if the LAMP should be called off (building it at a safer place).
regards
Julia
There not cheap from a short history point of view. However, Roger has valued them very highly and his valuations are usually extremely conservative. It's such an extreme move from his normal valuations in terms of relative height to current trading with no earnings it could be a reputation killer. I think he is far to sensible for that. That's got my interest and a bit more of my money this morning.
Millions of electric cars to end the OECD's dependence on foreign oil, wind farms, etc. A bit too optimistic though....
Excellent point. They never seem to provide specs on how much your I pad is really costing u after you have recharged it every day for 2 years!! $5000, $10,000. My that is expensive!
Then of course there's your I phone, I Pod. I CeAge.
Well that's what Tony Abbot told me it's going to cost!$5-10k.
Slight over-estimation.
54 years of corruption might just be enough. The 1% of GDP is Lynas revenue. No tax is payed for 12 years, no direct benefit to the people but severe risks. IAEA is a nuke-lobby organisation and polls and protests are for real. It's just one possibility and you might be right, but I just wouldn't bet on it because a 1-2 year delay can mean that Lynas will never be able to operate profitable.
This applies to all explorers, but to my knowledge Lynas is the first one
with a market cap of over 3 billion $.
Somebody said they can sell a product now. That's right. They can sell ore from Mt. Weld. The stuff with the highly advertised basked prices that has caused the hype is still a long way to go. 1 year in best case, 2-3 years likely and possible if the license has to wait until after elections and even 4-5 years if the LAMP should be called off (building it at a safer place).
regards
Julia
The "old" Julia returns. With the same old whatiffs. Maybe we should add "what if we get hit by a meteorite", just as likely to happen as all those negatives. If I had such a negative attitude of a stock I certainly wouldnt even read forum posts about it. ( unless of course I was shorting it and my shorts were on fire.)
Disclosure: closed my short position monday and tuesday (see above). Looking for new short engagements above $ 2
You could have filled that this morning!
you're becoming more and more professional, jochiBut thanks for your wishes. And yes: I moved to this forum because I was suspended simply for being critical which was valued as "downramping" which is absurd because LYC is a liquid stock and no individual on this planet is able to move such a stock one way or the other.
So, I think LYC is "cheap" IF:
1. Rare earth prices stay reasonably high (the $200 basket price is unrealistic. It will probably fall once LYC is supplying)
2. LAMP is constructed and running by the end of the year
3. LAMP expansion goes to plan
There are a lot of ifs there so beware.
And I have no issues with people ramming my stock down, when they go low enough I buy more ...
Stuff I buy should stand decent attack from fundamental fronts and rumour mongers.
I encourage people to short stocks I own
Again why you come here and spill your arguments. What are you gaining from this??
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?