This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Lost $1600 in one day trading OZL

Funnily enough it was the first time I had not used a stop loss, and sadly enough it was on the advice of another trader that I didn't (his suggestion was not to use one as I kept getting stopped out due to the volatility of silver).

Please don't use the word "trader" to describe this person. They are not a trader.
 
The reason I chose to trade this stock was that I bought 10,000 OZL 3 weeks ago at $1.68 and sold it at 1.84 on 25/8/08 before it started to plunge back, so this time I wanted to do the same trick again but got burnt - it dropped to a new low of $1.48 - god knows how long it will stay there.
 
OZL yesterday's close was $1.635 , but today it opened at $1.51 with today's high at $1.54 and low at $1.48.

I thought yesterday I bought at a good price at $1.65 cuz its 52 weeks was $1.63, obviously I got it very wrong

If its better to buy at a 'cheap' low price, then by logical progression, the best price is at $0 when the company goes bankrupt. Just think about all those mum and dad investors that were mesmerized by t1, bought in at t2 and continued to buy all the way down...
 
Heres my worst experience....about a year and a half ago.


https://www.aussiestockforums.com/forums/showthread.php?p=144665#post144665
 

This must be common train of thought with beginners. I mainly hold long term blue chips but I had a crack at catching a falling knife recently, made a profit, went in again then the stock went through the floor, should have known better. Don’t feel too bad at least you got out with a small loss.

Cutz.
 
OZL yesterday's close was $1.635 , but today it opened at $1.51 with today's high at $1.54 and low at $1.48.

I thought yesterday I bought at a good price at $1.65 cuz its 52 weeks was $1.63, obviously I got it very wrong

But this is the thing I just don't get. A very quick (1 min) look at the moves of this stock in excel from close to close tell me that the average negative day for the last 2 months is just over -4%.

How can a 7.5% fall be a suprise?? Only 2 weeks ago it fell 9% in one day then two weeks before that 15%.

Whats the point of this thread?? You say the market is to volatile. If you have no skill in judging adverse stock movements no market will suit you.
 

Are you suggesting I should hold the stock? Initially I really wanted to keep it to see how it goes next week, but it dropped to two year low of $1.48 which scared me so I sold off
 
Trembling Hand,

What’s the formula for separating the negative averages from the positive averages in a row of percentages?

Cutz
 
Are you suggesting I should hold the stock? Initially I really wanted to keep it to see how it goes next week, but it dropped to two year low of $1.48 which scared me so I sold off

NO. What I am saying is that the adverse move that you inflicted on yourself was a completely expected one. Yet you seemed surprised!!

My point is your position was obviously way to large for your account to cause such stress. correct? You have blamed the "volatile market" which is completely incorrect.

Do you know about position sizing?
 
Are you suggesting I should hold the stock? Initially I really wanted to keep it to see how it goes next week, but it dropped to two year low of $1.48 which scared me so I sold off
I wouldn't want to pre-empt TH's reply but I suspect he might have rather been wondering why you'd get into it in the first place, in that it has been in a clear downtrend and trading below the MA for some considerable time.

Might be good to stand aside from the present volatility while your loss is as small as this.
 
Trembling Hand,

What’s the formula for separating the negative averages from the positive averages in a row of percentages?

Cutz

=IF([CELL]<0,[CELL],0)

Will give you only values that are negative.
 
TH is spot on - this is all about position sizing. Setting a mandatory stop of 5% basically means if you have all of your capital in one trade then you stand to lose 5% of your capital.

If this fits with your plan then OK, but if you only are prepared to lose the standard noobe 2%, then you need to adjjust according to how much of your capital you are risking.

EG if you put 20% of your capital in a trade, then you can set your stop 10% below buy price as 10% of 20% is 2%. This is pretty much my trading plan, although I have made some huge slip ups by not setting stop losses recently so who am I to talk
 


The reason I chose to trade this stock was that I bought 10,000 OZL 3 weeks ago at $1.68 and sold it at 1.84 on 25/8/08 before it started to plunge back, so this time I wanted to do the same trick again but got burnt - it dropped to a new low of $1.48 - god knows how long it will stay there.

It was pure speculation like a gamble - I have so much to learn
 
TH is spot on - this is all about position sizing. Setting a mandatory stop of 5% basically means if you have all of your capital in one trade then you stand to lose 5% of your capital.

You won't last long risking 5% per trade.

I doubt TH would be 'for' risking 5%.
 
It was pure speculation like a gamble - I have so much to learn

Like money management and position sizing for starters. The R:R. Then trends. But I suspect if you keep "gambling" you will not last long enough to learn.
Anyway....... Good luck.
 


This stock is entrenched in a raging downtrend since busting support around the $2.50 level - what were you thinking? This dog has a lot further to go till some heavy support, around the 1.00 and then 0.75. Short it.

Regards
kam75
_____________________________
http://www.sharesmadeeasy.com
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more...