This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Latest tweets by The Donald

Jump to new
cynic said:
Found this on the Don's Facebook page.

If this conspiracy theory turns out to be true, then definite cause for concern:
Click to expand...

Love it!! Every, Single, Lie promulgated by Q Anon, Trump and his millions of zealots repeated with loving persuasive BS.

Ignore the fact that each and everyone one of these stories was tested in courts and found wanting, completely unreliable or just wrong. They have been painstakingly refuted time after time but this crew is impervious to reality or facts - much like the current Fantastist in Chief.

If the world was full of lizard people and shape shifters we would also "have cause for concern". Well there are your lizard people and shapeshifters in full view embarking on their crusade to pervert the US election system
 
More thoughts on "The Plot to Steal" piece promoted by the President on his Facebook page.

1) Brilliant ploy to post it on Christmas day. No other news. Who is going to challenge it while they are trying to enjoy Christmas with their families and friends

2) The story now has the support and promotion of the President of the US. That is a very significant endorsement. Can Trump can be personally challenged to provide evidence that proves the range of allegations made in the video ? Is this the opportunity he has to present his case directly to the courts ?

3) Will this split the Republicans ? How long can they continue to back or not confront this continuing challenge to integrity of the US election systems and all the components that support it ? Local electorate offices. Counters, supervisors, everyone.

4) How will this affect the upcoming Senate runoffs in Georgia ? Will it undermine the Republican vote and drive the Democrats under harder ?
 
I would be interested to know, how it is, that you were able to reach such certainty regarding those claims.

Is your confidence based solely upon failed efforts to have the allegations supported by the courts?
(It may be worth noting that courts are by no means infallible.)

Or perhaps you have other information/insights into the matter that you'd be willing to share?
 

I could quote a 100 plus analysis which point out the lies, misunderstandings and fallacies around the stolen election rubbish.
But in the end I would rest the case at the hands of the most partisan Attorney General to ever head the position in US history, William Barr.

Trump demanded that Barr use the FBI to find evidence to back up his claims of a rigged election. Barr, using all the resources of the FBI, could not find any evidence and said so.

But of course Trump needs a different answer so he will try to find somebody will find "something". And then they can take it to the courts and see if this evidence stands up. Trouble is of course nothing so far submitted to the Courts has looked remotely like standing up to scrutiny to date.

Disputing Trump, Barr says no widespread election fraud

WASHINGTON (AP) — Disputing President Donald Trump’s persistent, baseless claims, Attorney General William Barr declared Tuesday the U.S.
apnews.com

Barr says 'no reason' for special counsel on election fraud or Hunter Biden

Outgoing Attorney General William Barr said that the investigation into Hunter Biden's financial dealings was "being handled responsibly and professionally."
www.pbs.org

Trump Publicly Calls For Special Counsel To Probe Baseless Voter Fraud Allegations

President Trump’s push for a special counsel has now become public, on the same day Attorney General William Barr leaves the Department of Justice.
www.forbes.com
 
Thanks for providing that basilio.

I suspect that I am probably not alone, in allowing my opinion to be heavily influenced, by that which I would like to believe, rather than an impartial consideration, of the full spectrum of available data.
 
cynic said:
Thanks for providing that basilio.

I suspect that I am probably not alone, in allowing my opinion to be heavily influenced, by that which I would like to believe, rather than an impartial consideration, of the full spectrum of available data.
Click to expand...
Truth is its misdirection. It was won by the mail in ballots and the ballot harvesting, and collection groups that went along with it. Voter ID should be required and the harvesting shouldn't be an option. They will win Georgia using the same system.
 
SirRumpole said:
Interesting, if that could be proven it would be corruption I would think.
Click to expand...
The thing that surprises me, is that Bas hasn't been done for defamation. I see those mothers in Qld, that defamed a headmistress on Facebook, were done for heaps.
What Bas says, is beyond the pale, but gives me a great laugh.
 
moXJO said:
Truth is its misdirection. It was won by the mail in ballots and the ballot harvesting, and collection groups that went along with it. Voter ID should be required and the harvesting shouldn't be an option. They will win Georgia using the same system.
Click to expand...


Lets try again.

If the mail in ballots were harvested and massive false voter ID along with lots of other fraud allegations then why was were there not the same trends seen in the Congress and Senate elections where actual greater power could have won?

It was all on the same ballot called down the ballot voting.

How could this be the case?

Are the Democrats that clever? (I personally don't think so)

That's before you get to the Republican state government officials who got death threats for refuting all the allegations along with very conservative Republican judges and the ultra conservative supreme court.

Both parties have repeatedly stated they wouldn't mess with an election simple because the risk is too great.

Last point you avoid GOP gerrymander why?
 
moXJO said:
Truth is its misdirection. It was won by the mail in ballots and the ballot harvesting, and collection groups that went along with it. Voter ID should be required and the harvesting shouldn't be an option. They will win Georgia using the same system.
Click to expand...

"Mail in ballots and ballot harvesting".

The first is a totally legitimate way of voting which we call "postal votes", and the second is a legitimate operation of political parties which both sides do.

That the side that did it best is not the one you support is irrelevant.
 
sptrawler said:
The thing that surprises me, is that Bas hasn't been done for defamation. I see those mothers in Qld, that defamed a headmistress on Facebook, were done for heaps.
What Bas says, is beyond the pale, but gives me a great laugh.
Click to expand...

Actually I agree to an extent, not about bas in particular but defamation on social media should not be allowed to happen.

If a newspaper prints a defamatory article it gets sued.

Facebook etc are publishers, although they would deny it, but they are a medium for communication just like any other media outlet and should be subject to the same laws.
 
If you read back through I have said this countless times. The problem is the funding being filtering through advocacy groups and the payments made.

I have consistently said its a very grey area.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Trump Era 2025-2029 : Stock and Economic Comment
5 6 7
Replies
120
Views
7K
Garpal Gumnut
February 2025
2 3 4
Replies
64
Views
6K
ducati916
Dump Trump
9 10 11
Replies
214
Views
20K
wayneL
Will Trump's tariffs lead to a global trade war?
4 5 6
Replies
116
Views
14K
sptrawler
D
US Presidential Policy - Breaking it down
Replies
2
Views
3K
sptrawler
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more...