Julia
In Memoriam
- Joined
- 10 May 2005
- Posts
- 16,986
- Reactions
- 1,973
Employer confidence soars in W.A
Recruitment agency says 50% of WA employers will employ more permanent staff in the next 3 months.
Confidence has risen 5.5% the highest since September 2008
Thank goodness for the mining industry and bargain priced cars.
It seems Mr Rudd has finally woken up to the political damage he is incurring with the exponentially increasing boat arrivals. No new asylum claims will be processed for people from Afghanistan and Sri Lanka.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/8610679.stm
Yeppers -Bevo- .... Will the person who voted for this three ring circus please stand up !
Does anyone have any idea what will happen if all the States except Victoria agree to Mr Rudd's proposal?
I gather Ms Kenneally in NSW is also unwilling to commit that State, and is insisting that the Henry Tax Review be released before the Premiers are required to make a commitment on health.
Sounds very reasonable.
Rudd's obstinate "agree with me, and agree now" is reminiscent of the urgency which applied to the ETS which just had to be all legislated before Copenhagen.
Good to see at least two of the Premiers are showing some resistance to his bullying.
Todster, the above doesn't actually respond to my previous post, so I'm not sure why you've quoted what I said to express what we all know, i.e. that Rudd wants to win the election, and that Tony Abbott is cycling round the country.Rudd just wants to win the next election.
If he can keep the focus on health he might even pick up an extra seat.
He has already started flying around the country while the monk is on his pushy in the country side.
Are there any marginal seats on the mad monks journey?
Todster, the above doesn't actually respond to my previous post, so I'm not sure why you've quoted what I said to express what we all know, i.e. that Rudd wants to win the election, and that Tony Abbott is cycling round the country.
I'd genuinely like to know whether the non-agreement of, say, Victoria and NSW to the health 'reforms' will be enough for the Prime Minister to claim he has to go to a referendum.
And a further question about the protocols involved in a referendum:
Can Mr Rudd word this as he chooses, e.g. as Noco outlined earlier
"Do you want to see reforms to improve the health system?"
Is there any requirement for the Opposition to approve the wording?
Fairly obviously if the wording was as above, he will receive about a 100% positive response.
Did you see last night the Sunday show about the schools Krudd has built, what a **** up that has turned out to be, a canteen that is a unusable garage that cost $8000k.
I'm one of the many and not sorry. Howard had gone over the top and couldn't be trusted. Evidently a lot of people thought the same way. I may have voted for Turnbull next time but I think Abbot is a sleeze bag that I would not trust so it looks as though Rudd gets my vote again.
I'm one of the many and not sorry. Howard had gone over the top and couldn't be trusted. Evidently a lot of people thought the same way. I may have voted for Turnbull next time but I think Abbot is a sleeze bag that I would not trust so it looks as though Rudd gets my vote again.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?