- Joined
- 12 September 2004
- Posts
- 1,714
- Reactions
- 1
Not that you haven't summed things up well Buddy, but I really wanted to highlight this one.We will get rid of all those landed gentry (National Party voters) who have destroyed land, ie, we will import all food requirements.
The Australian newspaper has nominated Mr. Rudd as its Australian of the Year
Mr Rudd's selection - as the person who had the most significant impact on the nation in the past 12 months - stands out because of the extraordinary challenges that confronted Australia last year and helped define his prime ministership.
More here:
WITH the exception of wartime prime minister John Curtin, few Australian leaders have faced a more daunting crisis in their first term of office than that which confronted Kevin Rudd.
Mr Rudd was barely a year into his job as prime minister when a collapse of confidence in US financial markets spread like a contagion across the globe in late 2008, plunging much of the world into recession. What happened next proved to be a defining moment, both for Australia and for its new leader, who had never before held an economic portfolio.
Rather than risk waiting for a clearer picture to emerge, Mr Rudd and his team saw the need for urgent and radical action to protect the economy, approving a series of unprecedented financial stimulus packages to taxpayers and giving sweeping guarantees to the nation's banks.
Are you still going to be confident that he has been proven to be correct when taxes and charges are increased, and essential services cut, in order to claw back the deficit?He deserves the accolade.
He had to make some line ball decisions at the start of the melt-down. I didn't agree with them.
He has been proven to be correct.
Australia is better positioned than most atm.
gg
Are you still going to be confident that he has been proven to be correct when taxes and charges are increased, and essential services cut, in order to claw back the deficit?
Are you still going to be confident that he has been proven to be correct when taxes and charges are increased, and essential services cut, in order to claw back the deficit?
Pretty hard to see how he would get an ETS through now. The Libs won't be backing down - they'd lose their last shred of credibility.Hate to think how he will do it if he does get way with an ETS and CPRS!
Pretty hard to see how he would get an ETS through now. The Libs won't be backing down - they'd lose their last shred of credibility.
The return to Parliament next month should be interesting.
Pretty hard to see how he would get an ETS through now. The Libs won't be backing down - they'd lose their last shred of credibility.
The return to Parliament next month should be interesting.
Unless I'm mistaken, they don't have the numbers to get it through the Senate.Unfortunately Julia, I believe the Greens are watering down thier demands which may suit Labor. Both parties are currently in negotiations. It does not look good at all and could well be passed before the next election.
Unless I'm mistaken, they don't have the numbers to get it through the Senate.
Assuming Fielding, Xenophon and Scullion would vote with the Coalition, they have 39: Labor plus Greens have 37.
Also, Rudd is nothing if not politically savvy. He knows that with the total debacle that was Copenhagen, the public mood has shifted, and far fewer Australians are going to be in favour of the ETS. Business has also hardened their stand, with excellent reason.
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/br...ation-dick-smith/story-e6frf7jx-1225823061121PLANS to massively boost Australia's population are a bad idea and must be stopped, entrepreneur Dick Smith says.
The Federal Government favours a "big Australia'' and wants to increase the country's headcount from 22 million to 35 million by 2050, largely by immigration.
But Mr Smith said this was ridiculous.
"We need to do something about this incredible increase,'' he said at an Australian of the Year dinner in Parliament House today.
"No one is allowed to talk about it ... I am.''
Duckman, I was taken aback too. Then I rationalised it by considering they'd applied the same criteria as apparently "Time" does, i.e. the person who has had the most influence for that year. I suppose we would have to concede this is Rudd, in whatever direction.I am at a complete loss to explain "The Australian's" decision to make Kevin Rudd their Australian of the Year.
Day in day out, they have been extremely critical of, (in no particular order),
*The lack of progress
*The expansion of spin
*The headstrong drive towards a ETS
*His desire to put himself on the world stage
*Poorly directed government spending
*Him being a "poor mans Obama" - all talk
As for his handling of the global financial crisis - the newspaper even suggests that he was very fortunate to have inherited such a large warchest and a strong economy in the first place.
Kevin Rudd can thank Wilson Tuckey, Brendan Nelson, Malcolm Turnbull and the crew for making his first year decisions so unaccountable and lacking in critical analysis.
Duckman
Purple, I agree, but such a notion would be political suicide were it to be actually voiced by the government, or the opposition come to that.Slightly off-topic, but on the subject of an aging population who thereby needs millions of new citizens (either local-born or immigrant) to pay taxes in order for said aged component of population to live out their 80's, 90's and beyond in middle-class, well-provisioned and serviced comfort:
am I alone in thinking this idea is macabre?
Being on the cusp of old-fartdom myself, I see no reason to expect the younger generations to pay for the privilege of sharing the country with millions of doderers. The old have had their day, they should just quietly repose in the background.
As they get ill and die, well funny that. I thought that was pretty natural.
Presumably they're happy not to have died young, now they want to live forever?
As for Rudd, yeah, I'm over it. I used to think there was an intelligent mind there, but looks like I got that one wrong.
While suturing a cut on the hand of a 75 year old farmer, who's hand was caught in the gate while working cattle, the doctor struck up a conversation with the old man.
Eventually the topic got around to the Prime Minister.
The old farmer said, 'Well, ya know, in my opinion, the Prime Minister is a 'Post Turtle''..
Not being familiar with the term, the doctor asked him, what a 'post turtle' was.
The old farmer said, 'When you're driving down a country road and you come across a fence post with a turtle balanced on top, that's a 'post turtle'.
The old farmer saw the puzzled look on the doctor's face so he continued to explain. 'You know he didn't get up there by himself, he doesn't belong up there, he doesn't know what to do while he's up there and you just wonder what kind of dumb buggar put him up there to begin with !!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?