This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Is there a GOD?

Do you believe in GOD?

  • Absolutely no question--I know

    Votes: 150 25.6%
  • I cannot know for sure--but strongly believe in the existance of god

    Votes: 71 12.1%
  • I am very uncertain but inclined to believe in god

    Votes: 35 6.0%
  • God's existance is equally probable and improbable

    Votes: 51 8.7%
  • I dont think the existance of god is probable

    Votes: 112 19.1%
  • I know there is no GOD we are a random quirk of nature

    Votes: 167 28.5%

  • Total voters
    586
My thoughts exactly.

Never heard of Lao Tzu. Clearly he's a practical man of considerable intelligence.

I'll do a Google on him, see what information I can dig up. Anyone with that level of common sense is worthy of further investigation.
Writer of the Tao Te Ching. It's not known whether he was one person, or a composite.

Taoism has of course formed itself into a religion with various sects, but I like what I call "philosophical" Taoism, viz, the Tao Te Ching. So full of wisdom and common sense, yet at the same time, enigmatic. This way, each will take away what makes sense to him/her and probably something completely different to the next person. There is no doctrine, it's totally cool IMO.
 
By the way, back there I guessed that (whereas 50% of Americans might believe in young-earth-creationism) the number in Aus would be less than 5%. In fact it was 5.4% - I admit I was wrong.

MS+Tradesim said:
Dawkins is about as convincing as Hovind. Why is that so surprising? Do you have a prior commitment to Dawkins?
2020 said:
MS, I'd be amazed if more than 5% of people around here agreed with you that Dawkins and Hovind are equally convincing.

Just as long as we agree that Hovind (#171 or #172) and the "Kiwi banana man" are off with the pixies.
- stockguru's post #513 also refers.

https://www.aussiestockforums.com/forums/showthread.php?p=230584&highlight=hovind#post230584

https://www.aussiestockforums.com/forums/showthread.php?t=8203&highlight=evolution
 

Attachments

  • poll on evolution.jpg
    37.4 KB · Views: 93
  • what%20do%20americans%20believe.jpg
    38.4 KB · Views: 85
I guess we can give our own reasons why we are religious, or agnostic, or atheist etc. Then there are some real gems out there in youtube-land.

Not sure if anyone has heard DOUGLAS ADAMS being interviewed - such a funny bloke (Author of Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy). Turns out that Dawkins switched him from Agnosticism to Atheism. He explains why he is the latter rather than opt for the "wishy washy option" (in his words) of being an Agnostic (or a wishy washy Anglican for that matter).

DOUGLAS ADAMS: AMERICAN ATHEIST INTERVIEW

When Adams died young, in 2001, Dawkins gave this eulogy for his friend (who incidentally had introduced him to his wife).


:topic
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CziXZEoPg3c&feature=related Douglas Adams - 1/6 (set of 6 - not that I've seen em all)
amusing stuff for a rainy day
 
Yet another look at Pantheism - you'd be in good company
Einstein, Hawking, Sagan

http://www.pantheism.net/atheism.htm?gclid=CKblzK2J2pECFQ2QggodbSmLeA

Pantheist Atheists:-
 
https://www.aussiestockforums.com/forums/showthread.php?p=85175&highlight=zoan#post85175

Of all my distant relations, First was the miracle son,
I get to exercise 10 zillion body cells, Proto the Zoan had one;
Funny how fashions have shifted, Proto you son of a gun,
He didn’t get to have one raw emotion, I write strange ditties for fun

(ps "FFS" omitted because it adds nothing to most polite conversations)
http://mcwdn.org/Animals/Ameba.html
 

Attachments

  • ameba.jpg
    33.3 KB · Views: 74
  • ameba2.jpg
    20.6 KB · Views: 70
  • ameba3.jpg
    17.3 KB · Views: 72
Hey 2020hindsite, not meaning to be disrespectful - but you are tending to be overtaking this forum with copying quotes and references from all over the net.

How about your own opinions rather than inundating us with quotes from all over the internet.

Would really love to hear what's on your mind - most of us are pretty good with Google as well.
 
Completely agree.

2020. You actually stopped this for about a week and it was bliss to be able to read through a thread without having to scroll down through endless U-tube video pictures. I've in the past asked if you would be kind enough to just post a reference to any U-tube video you think is relevant (?) so we can at least choose whether or not to click on that link.

As Roland says, we are all reasonably able to decide what we want to look up via Google or U-Tube and your constant force feeding is really irritating, especially when some of it at least is less than relevant to the actual topic being discussed.

I'm sorry if you find this request offensive. That's not my intention.
But I am really pleading with you to stop cluttering up otherwise interesting threads with all this stuff.
 
Roland, You're not being disrespectable m8
I have given them before ( we are up to post #800 odd lol), can't expect you to check back.

Here's a poem I wrote pretty much sums it up.
https://www.aussiestockforums.com/forums/showthread.php?p=82450&highlight=christian#post82450

Let's say I'm a pantheist - fancy word (in my case) for a lover of Mother Nature - where you get your Words worth Made a point of checking out Lakes District in UK when I was there many years back now.
"And I have felt a presence that disturbs me with the joy of elevated thought".

I really liked that website I just found for "World Pantheism". (I'm also learning all the time ok? - I also enjoyed hearing Dougals Adams - and agreed with most of what he said - if I hadn't've agreed I'd probably have said so).

Followers include Sagan, Hawking , even Einstein etc - good enough for them good enough for me.

Einstein is often misquoted btw as being religious o rrather that he believes in God. - but he has clarified specifically that he does not believe in God as such, unless God is loosely used for Nature / merging into laws of physics etc.

On social front, that website on Pantheism acknowledges that people get strength from religion- and merges a bit of "religion" with atheism - (you'd have to read that post) - to get the best of both worlds.

Religious commandments? I just wish there was more emphasis on "lead me not into temptation" and less on "forgive us our trespasses". Leads to mountains of hypocrisy if you ask me. I believe that "an honest woman is the noblest work of "god", and an honest man is a close second". Let the ladies come first as they say

I believe Jesus lived, gave some great gigs up on the Mount etc - made a lot of sense with the principle of forgiveness. Trouble is only the Amish seem to practice his teachings if you ask me. More chance of an atheist following Jesus teachings than Fred Nile if you ask me.

And sure I believe people get strength from religion - the moslem prisoners were the most difficult to brainwash in Korean war days (so we were told in the Army anyways lol- then again we were told a heap of bull**** as well).

I happily use a concept of Heaven to comfort someone who has lost a relative etc. Heck if they believ in it you'd be cruel not to encourage them in that moment of grieving. But I have nil zilch expectation of actually ending up in Heaven - or Hell for that matter. Heaven is now here on Earth imo.

I initially thought that religion was responsible for most of the wars, but having started a thread to investigate exactly that i.e. the cause of many wars, I probably reckon it's at most 50%. Still, some present wars that would "go away" without the concept of "my god is better than yours" might include the Israel / Palestinian situation, Pakistan / India hostilities that flare up every now and again - Irish situation - where the UK army used to get warservice credits for service on home soil!! . Although the origins to the rish situation are religion, they go back such a long way that you'd have to say it's probably cultural these days I guess.

Certainly I'm very symapthetic to Dawkins - prodigious author, speaks in understandable terms, fantastic educator, Professor for Public Education in Science or whatever - who is trying to educate the USA away from the Adam and Eve thingo - "meme" or whatever, although I notice that Dawkins doesn't like the term meme much now. The US Bible Belt - and indeed right across the USA have decided to go backwards on the science education vs religion thing. And it doesn't look good for the world's biggest superpower to be dumbing down like that. (imo).

Watch this if you're interested in that lead. check out from the 4m30s mark to the end (8m 50s). They believe they came from Adam and Eve.

I can't stand Hovind. I love Carl Sagan. I can't stand the ridiculous nonsense that the bible gives ideas about use of the pill, and condoms - hence imo the Pope is directly responsible for massive man and woman-slaughter (if not damned nearly murder). Likewise homophobia allegedly found in the pages of the Bible. - absolute bs imo.

Extremism in the moslem faith has obviously gone off the deep end, what with people thinking they blow themselves up and end up with 70 odd virgins in heaven forever sheesh.

I spent many years in Asia , and I have a saffron Buddhist robe round here somewhere (and the odd poem yet again) . Tons of respect for Buddhists - until they start branding some kid the reincarnation of some Super Duper Dalai Lama etc etc

But as for loving nature ... I sure do, always have

https://www.aussiestockforums.com/forums/showthread.php?p=90703&highlight=jaywalk#post90703

 
Completely agree.

I'm sorry if you find this request offensive. That's not my intention.
But I am really pleading with you to stop cluttering up otherwise interesting threads with all this stuff.
Julia try reading that bit about Pantheism.
Imagine I specially posted it for you, ok?
Knowing as how you can't get youtubes etc .
 
Joe,
Julia doesn't like scrolling down past embedded youtubes.
Do we have your permission to give a simple one line link to a youtube?
Or do you prefer the full embedment. ? thanks
 
Roland, You're not being disrespectable m8
I have given them before ( we are up to post #800 odd lol), blah blah blah
What folks are saying 2020 (I think) is that they want a diversity of views, rather than wading through a great bulk of one persons view.

For instance, your definition of pantheism is very narrow. It is actually a broad church and encompasses such religious systems as hinduism and shintoism (I believe), as well as the non theistic version.

Also, attaching great names to the school of thought does nothing to add credibility. Einstein for instance has had his whole body of work shot to pieces by later scientists... and who know if they are even right? All that does is engender people to follow others thought, instead of some original thinking of their own.

A lot of people now call themselves atheists based on smart guy Dawkin's writings. Followers? What makes them different to the "faithful"?

Diverse views spark genuine thinking and lead people to find their own truth... and grant then that ferchrissake instead of trying to "sell" them on Dawkinsite atheism. He is just a searcher like all of us. His truth might not be the truth. I for one think he's an outright tosser, no better than Hovind.
 
well I just found that website - as posted back there -
- it is well worth a read. imo.

http://www.pantheism.net/atheism.htm?gclid=CKblzK2J2pECFQ2QggodbSmLeA
it's called "world pantheism".
It's a very loosely defined "religion".
 

Attachments

  • pantheism.jpg
    35.1 KB · Views: 72
I think the topic is too broad anyway. It brings in religion, creation, meaning of life, evolution etc
 
Watch this if you're interested in that lead. check out from the 4m30s mark to the end (8m 50s). They believe they came from Adam and Eve.

Well, we have few choices as to how human came to being.Fob James shows wisdom beyond his years and his ego gets a warm rub from the audience as he exposes his (no not genitals ) small mind.
 
There you go again 2020, copying websites again. I'm out of here, let me know when you have some of your own thoughts and opinions to post and I'll have a look.

roland pppft
lemme try this in monosyllables
try
looking
back
to
post
#849

and don't do what seems to be becoming a common problem i.e.
...responding to the last post only
 
Now you're a Bronte clone?

OMG, that was literally nearly 500 posts ago!!!!

well I needed some support lol
and I've got a good memory for compliments

to be honest I was searching for old posts to refer to - and found that - but no biggie

I was really searching for this one
there are 10^21 stars out there (accoding to NASA)
that means that for a full moon - (just went out to check - I get enthusiastic ok?)
about the size of your little fingernail at arms length
that behind that small moon / fingernail there are

guess !
a) 15 million stars (about)
b) 15 billion stars (ditto)
c) 15 trillion stars... ?

try
d) 15 thousand million million (15E15) stars !

And each of them has many planets say 6 times that again. (all these numbers very rough)
and that just behind one little fingernail. !

http://imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/ask_astro/answers/970115.html

PS I personally think that NASA really mean planets when they say stars - but heck as if it makes any difference to the point lol

and we have the gall to suggest that Earth is somehow the only one that "God is interested in"
absolute ...mmm not-very clever - if you ask me. : 2twocents

PS Area of sphere = 4.pi.r^2
radius arms length about 600mm
area of moon or fingernail about 10x10mm - say 8mmx8mm square to be conservative

ps g'day Bronte
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more...