explod
explod
- Joined
- 4 March 2007
- Posts
- 7,341
- Reactions
- 1,197
One has to wonder how many papers she looked through related to Climate Change to eventually find one with such a miserable conclusion. As the old saying goes, 'misery loves company'. A person's state of mind plays a great bearing on what they focus on. Bad outcomes, bad news, negativity all go hand in hand with ones' outlook if in a state of depression. This helps to feed the misery and despair in others, this would make her fell better to know she is able to depress other people. Whereas an upbeat study on CC would not fit her mental state. I guess I am just looking at this as a potential negative bias yet again from a journalist. Been a bit of this going around of late!What has this to do with CC Ann ??
Look on the positive side.Time to sell that seaside shack and Party in the hills
The person linked to a paper previously linked science paper.I guess I am just looking at this as a potential negative bias yet again from a journalist. Been a bit of this going around of late!
Ann,This is an article from a very depressed young lady Carly Cassella who lives with Chronic Fatigue. Chronic Fatigue can make people seek out depressing subjects and situations to re-enforce how they are feeling. Clearly she will not be looking for any positive articles to feature from the climate papers. There is no way we can verify what she is saying as the link to the paper she is quoting won't link. (Not doubting her, just like to see how things are worded).
Before anyone has a go at me about talking about her Chronic Fatigue, I lived with it for nearly 26 years before I found the cause and flicked it. I can bring it back at will to prove the cause is actually the cause (for me). I know how she is feeling.
Ann,
Why do you think that Carly Cassella is depressed?
No I did not say it should be dismissed, but was making a point to be aware of her potential bias toward information. In all subjects we should look for a bias so that we can judge its merit and give it proper balance.I'm asking this because you seem to suggest that her article should be dismissed because she's depressed.
Because it would be a futile exercise trying to find balanced facts now that it appears Google to be filtering information. I have wondered for a long time why there hasn't been more balance in scientific based evidence to be found and how hard it is to find any refuting evidence which there should be for any subject. Good debate has all but been shut down online regarding this subject. Can't fight a one sided agenda, when there is a lack of balanced information from which to draw to offer an alternate view, it is pointless.Why not tackle the real subject matter and search for current projections for future conditions in the Arctic?
And according to her Twitter bio Cassella herself is now a professional science writer. I speculate (it's my turn) that she simply wrote a piece about the UN report when it crossed her desk. No seeking out of articles, positive or negative, required.
AnnShe is writing online for a privately owned Australian site legitimizing itself with a name containing the word 'science'. This employs ten contributors who appear to have a focus toward the environmental agenda, if one reads the contributors profiles. There is no reference as to who is funding the site other than to say it is funded by the 'adverts' which appear on the site. My best guess would be Robert Purves . He has a special fund called the Purves Environmental Fund
He is the major funder of the Climate Council among many other environmental and focus group areas in Australia.
You have a problem with a bit of news about arctic ice re-advancing, slowing and thickening? Why do you sound so shocked that I found it Bas? The link is there, it is intact, I checked it.So how and where did you find this piece of science Ann ? Does this mean that you are open to examining a range of scientific analysis of ice melt in the Arctic and Antarctic ?
Yes, it's a good piece of science.You have a problem with a bit of news about arctic ice re-advancing, slowing and thickening? Why do you sound so shocked that I found it Bas? The link is there, it is intact, I checked it.
Google does not affect science.I know, it is pretty amazing this snuck by the Google censors, I guess they missed that it was not doom and gloom news. I was pleased to see it if just for the sake it was one that got away.
Ann, it appears you have no idea what the article means.No doubt it won't be too long before they issue a quick modelling to say, it won't last it is really all doom and gloom and this is a total aberration, won't last, will melt again. Then next time they will vet this sort of study and stop it from getting into general circulation.
Sorry Anne but I have a Nephew supporting a scientific team in antarctica and I'm afraid it is all bad. Just party my dear as we the humans are doomed.I knew what the article meant but one has to ask is if scientists didn't know that ocean temperature is a bigger player in glacier retreats and advances than previously thought, what else don't they know or are misinterpreting? Much store has been put into glacial melts, if this caught them by surprise there may be more surprises in store for scientists of things they previous thought was so but is not.
That is an interesting sort of job, what is his role there explod and how long has he been down there?Sorry Anne but I have a Nephew supporting a scientific team in antarctica and I'm afraid it is all bad. Just party my dear as we the humans are doomed.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?