- Joined
- 30 June 2008
- Posts
- 15,693
- Reactions
- 7,545
Is it still 2016 where you live?https://www.news.com.au/technology/...s/news-story/95b6b2cfe79613ae8151e095fb8ef8d0
Last month the hottest on record across the globe.
Keep having a good time comrades.
Is it still 2016 where you live?
Apologies, mixed the references, the one I wanted it on was June 2018. Was in the Washington Post but cannot lift it I find.Is it still 2016 where you live?
Thanks for that, I was about to ask you to place some bets for me, on the last two Melbourn Cups.Apologies, mixed the references, the one I wanted it on was June 2018. Was in the Washington Post but cannot lift it I find.
Anyhow Iuutzu is a step ahead, lol
Apologies, mixed the references, the one I wanted it on was June 2018. Was in the Washington Post but cannot lift it I find.
Anyhow Iuutzu is a step ahead, lol
Thanks for that, I was about to ask you to place some bets for me, on the last two Melbourn Cups.
I’m not certain but I think that building sites etc at least in some states stop work when the temperature exceeds x.working in +40C temperature... that's going to kill a whole lot of people early
And how does this ensure a level playing field for all nations?A conservative approach to dealing with climate change.
Declare energy independence with carbon dividends
A carbon tax and dividend system could usher in an era of clean energy independence
......Republican former Secretaries of the Treasury James Baker and George Shultz have called for a carbon dividends strategy, because:
...
- it avoids new regulation,
- it abides by conservative principles of market efficiency, and
- it leverages improvements to the Main Street economy to ensure a future of real energy freedom.
This is how carbon dividends work.
- A simple, upstream fee, paid at the source by any entity that wants to sell polluting fuels that carry such hidden costs and risk. This is administratively simple, light-touch, economy-wide, and fair to all.
- 100% of the revenues from that fee are returned to households in equal shares, every month. This ensures the Main Street economy keeps humming along.
- Because both the fee and the dividend steadily rise, pollution-dependent businesses — and the banks that finance them — can see the optimal rate of innovation and diversification to liberate themselves from the subsidized pollution trap. The whole economy becomes more competitive and more efficient at delivering real-world value to Main Street.
https://www.theguardian.com/environ...are-energy-independence-with-carbon-dividends
- To ensure energy intensive trade-exposed industries are not drawn away by other nations keeping carbon fuels artificially cheap, a simple border carbon adjustment ensures a level playing field, while adding negotiating power to US diplomatic efforts, on every issue everywhere.
This sounds suspiciously like a policy, cunningly designed for the purposes of duping a nation into economically crippling itself.
What?!!It sounds like an Emissions Trading Scheme which we could have had years ago if it wasn't for the Greens.
How do the origins of authorship alter the merits of the proposal?How are those two questions relevant to a policy proposed by two former US Treasury Secretaries for the USA?
How are those two questions relevant to a policy proposed by two former US Treasury Secretaries for the USA?
How do the origins of authorship alter the merits of the proposal?
It seems a reasonable proposal to me.How do the origins of authorship alter the merits of the proposal?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?