- Joined
- 29 January 2006
- Posts
- 7,217
- Reactions
- 4,437
You are very good at completely missing the point.Snowy 2 will always be needed, as will many, many more pumped hydro facilities, if renewables are to be the only source of generation.
Pumped hydro, hydrogen and or nuclear are the only current forms of bulk storage currently available, that can handle extended periods of low output from intermittent renewables.
Snowy2.0 only became necessary when there was no investment in large generation projects because of policy failures.
Europe is expanding its grid to accommodate increasing shares of renewables, including international DC connectivity, and has nothing the scale of Snowy 2.0.
The USA has no Snowy2.0 in the pipeline either as it expands into renewables, as they increasingly require new projects to to have significant battery backup and are also smart enough to harvest curtailed energy.
With a decent UHVDC spine Australia could tap into massive solar/wind projects and get its nascent hydrogen plans off the ground while at the same time reducing battery backup needs. I think China has the largest and longest at over 3000km delivering 12000MW, so that's what's possible in today's world.
As to your above link, it confirms everything I have been saying.
Without a policy setting to give certainty to new commercial investment governments are having to step in. It's farcical!