Is Global Warming becoming unstoppable?

[bi-polar]

There are 3.5bn tons of coal to warm China's water supply from Tibet and also methane comes from yaks, less than cattle. The British and Chinese royalty use horse and coach . Yak coaches are likely for Charles.

 

[wayneL]

 

[rederob]

...posted a tweet...

Most people learn when to call it a day because they know they have nothing of substance to add.
Is that something you might learn?
Or do we have to endure another 10 years of your rubbish?

 

[wayneL]

Hahaha, Pielke Snr, Curry, rubbish? You really are a biased turd aren't you.

 

[wayneL]

More interesting science.



No watch the turds smear, smear smear, but never contest the science.

 

[rederob]

No watch the turds smear, smear smear, but never contest the science.

Perhaps you could quote the actual science that supports your views.
You have been scraping the bottom of the barrel for a very long time and cannot work out it is empty.

 

[explod]

Perhaps you could quote the actual science that supports your views.
You have been scraping the bottom of the barrel for a very long time and cannot work out it is empty.

Never does, only far right wing media twists.

My evidence is what we see and know, Hayman Islands flattened, if this had occurred over the last 50 thousand years there would have been no settlements there, or Pakistan and places becoming newly exposed all over the planet.

 

[rederob]

Never does, only far right wing media twists.

He links to a guy who has been trying to get his ideas published for 8 years, and cannot work out why - so funny.
The reason is very simple.
He does not have a clue about what he is trying to publish, and everyone but him and wayneL knows it.
Sadly this guy is well known for his ineptitude and there is even a YouTube upload explaining why he’s got it so wrong.
In simple terms, he thinks there is an error which propagates whereas it actually terminates, and it’s theoretical rather than actual.

 

[basilio]

He does not have a clue about what he is trying to publish, and everyone but him and wayneL knows it.

Are you sure about that Redrob? If Pat Frank was so clearly and obviously wrong why does a Watts Up proudly promote his "ideas" ? Surely they would understand the basic error and not be an unwitting party to promoting misinformation...

https://moyhu.blogspot.com/2019/09/another-round-of-pat-franks-propagation.html

 

[rederob]

Are you sure about that Redrob? If Pat Frank was so clearly and obviously wrong why does a Watts Up proudly promote his "ideas" ? Surely they would understand the basic error and not be an unwitting party to promoting misinformation...

Bas, what's really sad is that WUWT is one of the most visited sites globally about climate.
It rates low on actual science, but those like wayneL seem to prefer a quick take away which requires no thinking.

...watch the turds smear, smear smear, but never contest the science.

Again, what science would that be?

 

[SirRumpole]

There hasn't been a lot of coverage of this in the mainstream media (maybe not surprisingly), but Dr
Michael Mann who came up with the "hockey stick " graph of global warming has lost a defamation case he bought against one of the people who criticised his findings.

Dr Manns graph has been widely publicised, and used in books and films, notably Al Gore's " An Inconvenient Truth".

So , does this invalidate the "science" behind global warming, or was it simply an extreme extrapolation of data ?

No doubt the sceptics will be on to this like a seagull on a hot chip.

https://www.lifesitenews.com/opinio...ed-to-pay-opponents-legal-costs-in-libel-suit

 

[rederob]

There hasn't been a lot of coverage of this in the mainstream media (maybe not surprisingly), but Dr Michael Mann who came up with the "hockey stick " graph of global warming has lost a defamation case he bought against one of the people who criticised his findings.
Dr Manns graph has been widely publicised, and used in books and films, notably Al Gore's " An Inconvenient Truth".
So , does this invalidate the "science" behind global warming, or was it simply an extreme extrapolation of data ?

Mann's work has been consistently validated and the legal case does not affect it.
Climate science denial sites have not reproduced the court's detailed ruling because it is consistent with Mann's claims, however that has not stopped them spreading their usual misinformation.

 

[rederob]

Dr Manns graph has been widely publicised, and used in books and films, notably Al Gore's " An Inconvenient Truth".
So , does this invalidate the "science" behind global warming, or was it simply an extreme extrapolation of data ?

Just adding an apology to Michael Mann after my earlier reply.

 

[basilio]

Just adding an apology to Michael Mann after my earlier reply.

That is quite a succict and important summing up of the whole trashy business of accusing Michael mann of making up data.
Well worth a read for people who value the truth.

 

[wayneL]

Beautiful stuff, denial cuts both ways it seems.

 

[rederob]

Beautiful stuff, denial cuts both ways it seems.

You, to date, are the epitome of those who are poorly informed yet want to add something to cyberspace, albeit NOTHING.
If you actually have something to support your assertions, please offer it.

 

[basilio]

Back to reality. What is happening to Greenland and how it will affect all of us - whether we believe it or not.
Climate change: Greenland's ice faces melting 'death sentence'

Greenland's massive ice sheet may have melted by a record amount this year, scientists have warned.

During this year alone, it lost enough ice to raise the average global sea level by more than a millimetre.

Researchers say they're "astounded" by the acceleration in melting and fear for the future of cities on coasts around the world.

One glacier in southern Greenland has thinned by as much as 100 metres since I last filmed on it back in 2004.

 

[SirRumpole]

Climate change linked to changes in earth's orbit.

"In an analysis of the past 1.2 million years, a geologist examining ocean sediment cores has discovered a pattern that connects the regular changes of Earth's orbital cycle to changes in the Earth's climate."

Maybe some contribution to GW, but does it explain it entirely ?

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/04/100406133707.htm

 

[rederob]

Climate change linked to changes in earth's orbit.
"In an analysis of the past 1.2 million years, a geologist examining ocean sediment cores has discovered a pattern that connects the regular changes of Earth's orbital cycle to changes in the Earth's climate."
Maybe some contribution to GW, but does it explain it entirely ?
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/04/100406133707.htm

Not sure what you are getting at, but better a better paper is here.
Global warming in the modern context excludes the notion of natural variability.

 

[SirRumpole]

Not sure what you are getting at

Simply playing the devil's advocate and waiting for you to knock it down.

Thanks.