- Joined
- 19 October 2006
- Posts
- 235
- Reactions
- 0
Greg Tubby
Wednesday, 5 March 2008
MICHAEL Kiernan's India Resources is running its ruler over an iron ore property in India with a view to entering into a similar 'dig and deliver' arrangement to the one it has with Hindustan Copper.
Kiernan refused to comment further after presenting at PDAC in Toronto, but said the company was also talking with another potential Indian partner about an unrelated property.
India Resources operates the Surda copper mine under contract with government-owned Hindustan Copper.
Kiernan is coy about the terms of the arrangement with Hindustan, referring to it as 'secret men's business'.
'There is an agreed price between IRL and Hindustan that allows IRL a reasonable return on equity for the $8-10 million we have spent refurbishing the Surda mine plus a profit,' Kiernan said.
He said India Resources was leveraged to the copper price, but refused to reveal further details of the arrangement.
Kiernan is characteristically bullish about India, saying the geology is similar to South Africa and Western Australia. However, he says the Indian industry is still under-developed with plenty of opportunities for a foreign company that can supply expertise and capital.
India Resources' business model is to explore and operate mines in India but not to seek to control the tenements, a strategy Kiernan is confident will enable the company to avoid some of the bureaucratic difficulties faced by some other foreign companies in India.
Shares in the company were last trading at 15c, unchanged since the start of the week.
Hey Prawn,
the stock already went up 28% dude, how far do u want it to go up by? bloody MK is killing off the TTY share with all this buying
Risk seems to be political with Indian resistance to foreigh ownership. Also cash burn is high - $3m a quarter. So any delay in mining coudl hurt.
Geez it is a tempting valuation at $17m market cap for a copper producer. Those that pick the turn around point will do well on this one IMO.
I've only had a brief look at this company but, to be honest, this whole operation looks rather dodgy to me.
Maybe I've been looking in all the wrong places, but I can't seem to find any information on their projected production costs per lb of copper... anyone?
Also, why is there a veil of secrecy covering the supply contract between themselves and HCL? Are the terms of the contract that unfavourable towards IRL?
How can any investor make an informed investment decision, when the projected sales income from their copper operation is unknown?
To me it seems that IRL is nothing more than a vehicle for HCL to mine copper without having to invest any $$ and take on any of the associated risk.
And the supply contract probably offers HCL the resulting copper concentrate at bargain basement prices, which would probably explain why no contract details have been forthcoming...
In other words; IRL investors are nothing more than cash mules for HCL.
But like I said, I've only had a brief look, so if any of the more knowledgable folk out there are of the opinion that I ought to be corrected, please feel free to do so..
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?