- Joined
- 24 February 2013
- Posts
- 786
- Reactions
- 1,280
Yeah, I meant to say less than two, but I had the 1.5 figure in my head because I had just fact checked it before posting, I am not sure why I wrote one, just a typo I guess. It’s been something I have been thinking about for a while.
Either way, my point remains, Australian birth rates are not creating population growth, only reason we are growing is immigration.
It’s a fact in pretty much most of the developed world, the global birth rate is about 2.3 or 2.5 depending on source, because it’s propped up by Africa and the Middle East. so most developed nations that want to maintain their population will require immigrants from the nations with higher birth rates.
View attachment 168110
I am personally against population growth as it is just a ponzi scheme that is kicking the can down the road and crushing the average persons standard of living (especially in Australia). I think population shrinkage if managed well is not catastrophic like many people assume it is. Estonia for example has had a shrinking population since 1990 and they have been doing just fine.
And yes in a "first world" country the replacement rate of birth is usually around 2.1
I would argue that the divergence between the inflation rate actually faced by the average consumer in Australia and what the CPI figures say is quite large at the moment. I feel that the average person in Australia in reality is facing double digit inflation. I could write a lengthy post about the short comings of official CPI figures if I wanted to. If anyone here only had their cost of living rise by 1.2% in the past quarter feel free to post here and let me know.