- Joined
- 8 June 2008
- Posts
- 12,832
- Reactions
- 18,793
That's cheapI paid $10.50 for 3 lattes in Pascoe Vale South today (cyclists). (Not trendy place but good coffees). Time to walk out on them!
That's cheapI paid $10.50 for 3 lattes in Pascoe Vale South today (cyclists). (Not trendy place but good coffees). Time to walk out on them!
Moreland Road.That's cheap
A bit far for the frog , and more paddle boat than cycling these days in QldMoreland Road.
Down your way, McCaffe give seniors a free coffee, something for you to look forward to. LolWhat... for a cup or bucket , $4.50 is my limit not many places left at that price
Check out budget direct.@Value Collector Yep, time to to shop around. I have been with the same company for 20 years (plus a big Policy for business). Might increase the excess also.
@Smurf1976 It's worth a few bucks and definitely not your average house in the burbs . I had a quantity surveyor check a few years ago just to make sure I had the Insurance right. Being under insured is a big risk (co-insurance clause).
I have seen some big Insurance increases in the past but 40% is ridiculous. Hopefully there will some better deals elsewhere. But I have also been caught up where they just want to reduce the risk in their book for particularly types of insurance - maybe the luxury house market is an area they have been stung. Who knows. The rep is not being forth coming with info.
Time to buy QBE?
... and sadly you're training them up for the next claimantI've had to fight a lot of insurance companies on their bs for people and have won simply because the guys they get don't have the technical knowledge to argue against me. Some of the reasons they use is ridiculous.
that is why i call insurance gamblingCouple of things the insurance companies are doing to get out of paying out claims lately:
If something doesn't meet Australian standard then they won't pay out.
There's a local case of solar panels blowing off the roof and taking the roof sheets with it. Now because the roof pitch was a tad under 5degrees and they used corro sheets they wouldn't pay out. Despite that having no impact as to why the damage occurred.
If you haven't had maintenance regularly done on your roof they won't pay for damages.
I've had to fight a lot of insurance companies on their bs for people and have won simply because the guys they get don't have the technical knowledge to argue against me. Some of the reasons they use is ridiculous.
May have been charged for two but only received one!5 to 6 dollars for a mug is the ongoing price here.are you sure you were not charged for 2?
I had people call me about a job that was done by insurance hired tradies.the best stories are when you try to claim on damage caused by the insurers sub-standard repairs from a previous claim
With insurance, often the biggest trouble is the consumer not understanding what they are actually covered for, and making claims that are not covered.Couple of things the insurance companies are doing to get out of paying out claims lately:
If something doesn't meet Australian standard then they won't pay out.
There's a local case of solar panels blowing off the roof and taking the roof sheets with it. Now because the roof pitch was a tad under 5degrees and they used corro sheets they wouldn't pay out. Despite that having no impact as to why the damage occurred.
If you haven't had maintenance regularly done on your roof they won't pay for damages.
I've had to fight a lot of insurance companies on their bs for people and have won simply because the guys they get don't have the technical knowledge to argue against me. Some of the reasons they use is ridiculous.
I've done it over 30 years now and I've seen insurance companies cover less and less. Not only that but they will actively try and get out of paying for legitimate claims by claiming its something else. I've fought and won every case for people that I thought was a legitimate claim despite the insurance companies thinking otherwise.With insurance, often the biggest trouble is the consumer not understanding what they are actually covered for, and making claims that are not covered.
We saw this stuff in the last floods, most insurance policies don’t automatically cover flood, you have to add it if you want it.
You also see it in travel insurance when travellers are injured on scooters or while drinking etc. it’s all laid out in your terms and conditions.
@moXJO A few years ago when I was very badly injured had to fight tooth and nail to get what I was insured for. Finally the threat of Court action instigated by me made them see the error of their ways.I've done it over 30 years now and I've seen insurance companies cover less and less. Not only that but they will actively try and get out of paying for legitimate claims by claiming its something else. I've fought and won every case for people that I thought was a legitimate claim despite the insurance companies thinking otherwise.
Majority of the time the insurance companies will just say it's something they don't cover.
I tender the above as a more succinct evaluation....yes, insurance companies are assholes.
You would think that but the seem to hire idiot building consultants that can't counter my reports. A lot of the time I'm countering their dribble. Insurance companies pay crap rates for reports. They end up with what they pay for. Probably why I haven't had a problem yet.... and sadly you're training them up for the next claimant
I think I stirred up a hornets nest
Very challenging analysis. Couple of points stood out. The huge rise in severe storm damage losses is a red flag and ceratinly highlights this particular event as a major factor in damage and Insurance payouts
1) Climate change is seen as a major risk factor for the reinsurance and insurance industry, in particular with the increased frequency and severity of weather-related events in recent years. S&P analysis found reinsurers’ estimates of their exposure to natural catastrophe risk could be underestimated by as much as 33 to 50 percent. More frequent and extreme weather events will have a direct impact on the (re)insurance industry, while a failure to properly account for the impact of climate change in modelling and pricing could lead to significant unexpected volatility in earnings and capital, resulting in pricing corrections. Climate change is considered a key factor in 19 of the top 21 reinsurers rated by S&P. In 2021, AM Best issued a report stating around 13 percent of downgrades were related to climate change.
2) The first six months of 2022 were marked by large-scale disasters on nearly every continent that led to above-average losses for the insurance industry
The cumulative charts in Exhibit 3 below show secondary perils continuing to dominate the costliest 1H economic and insured loss perils during the past ten years. Primary perils, including earthquakes and tropical cyclones, have been moderately lighter through the peak of tropical cyclone season, typically in Q3. There has been a consistent trend in accelerating severe convective storm losses that are tied to continued exposure growth and more impactful peril behaviour. Also, despite the high cumulative economic impact of flooding, insured losses remained significantly lower as insurance coverage (mostly in Asia) stays low.
Exhibit 3: Cumulative Economic & Insured Losses by Peril up to 1H 2022 ($ billion)
View attachment 168233
Hello and welcome to Aussie Stock Forums!
To gain full access you must register. Registration is free and takes only a few seconds to complete.
Already a member? Log in here.