Has the 100 year Jihad (war) begun ... ???
- Thread starter DB008
- Start date
-
- Tags
- 100 year war islam jihad war
This explains the reason why Israel must retain the occupation of the West Bank.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k2hZ6SlSqq0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k2hZ6SlSqq0
So_Cynical
The Contrarian Averager
- Joined
- 31 August 2007
- Posts
- 7,464
- Reactions
- 1,463
That video Explains the Military and Defence reasons why Israel must retain the occupation of the West Bank.
A political solution that supports a Palestinian state with fair borders, compensation and mutual respect with result in Israel not being in a state of war, therefore not needing to think defensively...Israel must embrace the inevitable.
And what is the inevitable?
Did you listen to the whole of that U-Tube, if you didn't, then I suggest you do.
- Joined
- 21 April 2014
- Posts
- 7,956
- Reactions
- 1,070
Dam.
I don't think the West Bank or Gaza is enough.
I think Israel must also control Jordan, Syria, Lebanon... must also control Iran, the entire Middle East... then must also control Europe, control Russia, control Africa, India... then the entire world for it to be safe.
What world does these video makers live in.
But let say the premise is true - that Israel must control the West Bank's air, land, roads, borders... must control and force the Palestinians there to be unarmed, without a defense force.. that all these must be done in order to keep Israel safe.
If that's true, why then does Israel keep expanding its settlements into the West Bank? Why bring more and more of its people into and closer to the other Arab terrorist states?
- Joined
- 23 April 2008
- Posts
- 1,838
- Reactions
- 599
Noco, you must be jewish???
And how did you work that out Macquack?
You are way off the mark.
Perhaps I could say you are a Muslim being anti Jewish.
I think some of you fellows should listen to that U-Tube again.
It was a UN resolution 242 after the 1967 6 day war with the Arabs that allowed Israel to occupy the West Bank, the Golan heights and the Gaza strip.
The Palestinians told Israel if Israel hand back the Gaza strip, they would guarantee peace...of course Hamas did not recognize that agreement nor did they accept the UN resolution 242.
So please listen again and you might learn something about the truth.
It was a UN resolution 242 after the 1967 6 day war with the Arabs that allowed Israel to occupy the West Bank, the Golan heights and the Gaza strip.
The Palestinians told Israel if Israel hand back the Gaza strip, they would guarantee peace...of course Hamas did not recognize that agreement nor did they accept the UN resolution 242.
So please listen again and you might learn something about the truth.
- Joined
- 23 April 2008
- Posts
- 1,838
- Reactions
- 599
"Jews have been expelled from 109 Nations" (and more...)
Can't blame the muslems for all of that history.
Last edited by a moderator:
Wow Macquack, you are desperate......Now those same countries are faced with the same problem but this time it is Islam.
Last edited by a moderator:
- Joined
- 23 April 2008
- Posts
- 1,838
- Reactions
- 599
Noco, the "jews" are not the "chosen people". They are just pedalers of propaganda.
- Joined
- 21 April 2014
- Posts
- 7,956
- Reactions
- 1,070
From memory, the 1967 war got Israel, i.e. expand Israel's territories, to what it is today - excluding the West Bank and Gaza. This mean Israel then, based on that 1967 Green Line, would legally own some 80% of historic Palestine.
The entire world, even the US, agrees that that 1967 border is where Israel ought to be... I think the UN made an exception to the general rule that no nation is to take new territories from war. Israel did expand and thus committed war crime - but the world let it slide.
Not happy with 80% of what was Palestine, Israel, citing historic, biblical, security etc. reasons, keeps expanding new settlements, further and further into the West Bank - taking the best land, controlling all water resources; segregating the West bank into cantons where normal travel, visits or business among Palestinians within the West Bank an almost impossible thing to do - check points, dirt roads or a couple highly congested roads with checkpoints for Palestinians while Israelis have their motor ways and speed past these sub-human miseries.
After the 51 day war this August, it further increase its settlements by 3000m2[?] - its largest since 1967 I think - again in the West Bank. The spoils of war I guess.
Next, it'll be war with Iran. Though I think Iran just had an official visit from China and two of its warships.. maybe Iran's nuclear problem will be fixed soon and war just might not be necessary.
- Joined
- 21 April 2014
- Posts
- 7,956
- Reactions
- 1,070
- Joined
- 21 April 2014
- Posts
- 7,956
- Reactions
- 1,070
War against ISIS costs US $1.1B since June
http://www.ibtimes.com/war-isis-iraq-syria-has-cost-us-11b-june-pentagon-1700256
Saw on some news show estimates for "moderate" airstrikes alone would cost US some $200-$300 million per month; Last year or in 2011, war in Iraq costs US $106 Billion.
Man, do they just print money and that's it?
http://www.ibtimes.com/war-isis-iraq-syria-has-cost-us-11b-june-pentagon-1700256
Saw on some news show estimates for "moderate" airstrikes alone would cost US some $200-$300 million per month; Last year or in 2011, war in Iraq costs US $106 Billion.
Man, do they just print money and that's it?
So the Jewish are, were, as terrorising terrorists as the Muslims?
Hardly.....how can you brand the current Israeli regime as terrorists.... .you are just making things up and twisting things to suit your own argument.
It is obvious you and Macquack are anti Jews and pro Muslim and you are in favor of ISIS killing and beheading innocent people....Shame on you
- Joined
- 21 April 2014
- Posts
- 7,956
- Reactions
- 1,070
Come on noco, don't say stuff like that in this climate. Took me a while to get my kid to sleep, helicopter raids would waste all that effort. haha
Macquack use Jefferson as his icon... Jefferson!... we hold these truths to be self evident, that all men are created equal.
Anyway, I think we shouldn't group all Arabs as one entity with one interest... same as you shouldn't group Jewish people with Israel and its policies.
DeepState
Multi-Strategy, Quant and Fundamental
- Joined
- 30 March 2014
- Posts
- 1,615
- Reactions
- 81
Apparently not.
What does $300m per month translate to as a proportion of the defence budget? Here's a clue: quite a bit less than 1%.
What would that make the expense relative to the size of the Federal Reserve's balance sheet? Quite a bit less than the above.
Quite-a bit-less squared. QUABL-Squared. A new kind of financial scare-mongering derivative.
I'll bet he will be blocked by the Green/Labor coalition.
http://blogs.news.com.au/heraldsun/...bott_wants_powers_to_ban_preachers_of_terror/
The Islamic State’s campaign of jihadist terror is “blessed”? “Noble”? And Muslims here should decide how to react to our campaign to defeat the “most potent uprising in the Muslim world”?
So I understand Tony Abbott’s concern:
TONY ABBOTT has pledged to “red-card” hate preachers from entering Australia, but has admitted his government can’t yet ban the radical group Hizb ut-Tahrir…
“We’ve looked at banning them, but we were advised under exisiting law we can’t do it,” he told 2GB Radio.
But Mr Abbott said a change to the law, that he hopes comes into force by the end of the year, will make it an offence to also promote terrorism, “not just to engage in terrorism”.
“Then I suppose we have to have another look at Hizb ut-Tahrir to see whether they fall under the definition of promoting terrorism.
http://blogs.news.com.au/heraldsun/...bott_wants_powers_to_ban_preachers_of_terror/
The Islamic State’s campaign of jihadist terror is “blessed”? “Noble”? And Muslims here should decide how to react to our campaign to defeat the “most potent uprising in the Muslim world”?
So I understand Tony Abbott’s concern:
TONY ABBOTT has pledged to “red-card” hate preachers from entering Australia, but has admitted his government can’t yet ban the radical group Hizb ut-Tahrir…
“We’ve looked at banning them, but we were advised under exisiting law we can’t do it,” he told 2GB Radio.
But Mr Abbott said a change to the law, that he hopes comes into force by the end of the year, will make it an offence to also promote terrorism, “not just to engage in terrorism”.
“Then I suppose we have to have another look at Hizb ut-Tahrir to see whether they fall under the definition of promoting terrorism.
- Joined
- 23 April 2008
- Posts
- 1,838
- Reactions
- 599
Israel bombing UN run schools and hospitals in Gaza was a terrorist act.
Want to take that one back, Noco?
Israel bombing UN run schools and hospitals in Gaza was a terrorist act.
Want to take that one back, Noco?
Don't you read or listen to the news Macquack?
Only the naive would swallow the talk about Israel bombing UN run schools and hospitals.....Hamas were firing their rockets into Israel under the cover of UN schools and hospitals.....Israel gave the civilians plenty of warning to get away from those rocket launchers before bombing them....yes some civilians were in the wrong place at the wrong time.
What was Israel supposed to do?...let Hamas continue unabated...
I am sure you know all about the Hamas terrorist modus operandi....if you don't, well you must be very naive or ignorant.
I never hear you talk about the thousands of Christians and infidels that have been murdered in northern Iraq and Syria by Isis.
Similar threads
