Care to explain what you are trying to get across there aclassic ?
Good morning explod. This thread has gone very quiet. mmm. No commentary on events influencing pog that's all. Calm before storm?
rgds.
Care to explain what you are trying to get across there aclassic ?
Good morning explod. This thread has gone very quiet. mmm. No commentary on events influencing pog that's all. Calm before storm?
rgds.
Onshore oil is usually $8 a barrel it is selling for about $90. Even tar sand oil which is one of the most expensive ways to come by oil is about $40 a barrel which is slightly better than your ratio on silver.
Bhp's iron ore is operating on a 75% profit margin, meaning the cost of production is only 25% of the sale price, and that is a commodity well off it's highs.
Infact most of bhp's commodities a working on far better ratios than the one you mentioned,
Interesting that Wall Street rallied as the storm Irene proved to be less than forcast. Great fundamentals indeed.
The majority of silver is bought up as a byproduct, Silver Wheaton is sourcing much of its silver in the $3 range on long term contracts with byproduct producers!!!! The multiple on the majority of silver product well exceeds most anything else. Primary silver mines are another thing altogether but they are in the minority. So what numbers do you want to use? Saying that about silver is every bit as valid as quoting onshore lifting costs for oil, which by no means accounts for anywhere near easily. No gambling, the fundamentals underpinning the worlds monetary system guarantee it and that is simply because gold is the best internationally recognized form of money that is no one else's debt.
If I was trying to cherry pick numbers I would have used $1 a barrel for Saudi oil.
Either way, it was explod who brought up production costs of silver, I was just commenting that the figures he provided were not fantastic.
Time will tell if you are right about golds bull run, i suspect you are wrong but that's just my opinion,
Your full of yourself explod, you act like your opinions are conservative rational opinions but they are not, it is your opinion and wild projections that you put out there as fact that is dangerous and set to mislead the new comers.
Would you point out some of my wild prejections?
It is not hard to work out as the price of gold has gone up an average of 30% per year since 2001. And as the monetisation of debt looks to continue so will the price of gold go up on its current trend.
We have had a fair bit of it this year so I am calling US$2,200 2011
2012 about $2,900
2013 " " 3,900
roughly of course, but as the general investment community is now taking a little bit of notice it my go up exponentially further.
And we are nowhere near the mania of the dot. com for example, when the taxi driver insists on buying, only then will it hit the top and be time to sell.
They very fact that you seem to believe that this pretty metal that produces nothing, an is already 6 times higher in price than it was 10 years ago will continue to increase in value by 30%pa is crazy to me.
As I said earlier, All Bull markets end Badly. Gold will be no different. I am not making any predictions as to timings, But eventually this commodity which has been pushed up in value because of fear will be sold down, and money will flow back to those assets that actually produce, and when that happens it will be hard and fast.
Now, call me crazy, But I believe it is better to "Buy low, sell high" rather than the reverse. And many asset classes are on sale at the moment which will produce returns for many years into the future, dealing in current terms no matter what happens to the currency in the mean time.
1, Interesting. Hardly any rank and file invetors out there yet know that gold exists and you are trying to call it at the peak and risky.
2, It has remained above the 200 day trailing average since the end of 09 and you say it is risky.
3, Paper money is losing its value by the day and
4, gold which has been money for 5,000 years is risky.
5, Sell high for sure but inflation adjusted since the average of gold in 1980, $500 inflation adjusted, is conservatively around $3,500 an ounce.
6, Sure there is food and other essentials and we keep note of those things but there are no real strong trends at the moment. Rare earths is one and so is energy but the trends are nothing like that of gold nor at the moment are the fundamentals.
1, Gee you don't give the investing public much credit, I think you are wrong, everybody knows about gold, everybody.
2, Yes, I do say it's risky.
3, Who cares, Have I ever said that it doesn't, after factoring in interest though it is not losing value.
4, yes, no matter how good the asset nothing is worth an infinate price, and buying at historical highpoints leads to disaster, especially when their is no income to save you.
5, thats my point, in 1980 gold was in a bubble and then crashed and took nearly 3 decades to get back to that level. you could of bought gold cheaper in 2000 than you could in 1979, and that was after earning interest on those paper dollars for 20 years.
6, and that doesn't ring alarm bells for you,
1. Can you explain with this chart to me with all you wisdom. And maybe give some indication as to what a bubble would look like, because this chart looks like every other bubble chart i have seen. note the gold price has gone even higher since this chart, which would make the chart look even more bubbly.
2. It actually looks similar to this one from the all ords, you can see they both had previous bull markets that have ended badly.
But it's ok, I am sure it's different this time.
2. You are posting up an example of one of the worst financial depressions in history (the GFC) - this is a poor example.
, Interesting. Hardly any rank and file invetors out there yet know that gold exists and you are trying to call it at the peak and risky.
1. What goes up must come down. Of course it's gonna come down (eventually) If you're going to avoid entering these things because it's eventually going to come back down - well you're potentially missing out on profit in my humble opinion.
2. You are posting up an example of one of the worst financial depressions in history (the GFC) - this is a poor example.
Finally, gold is not parabolic yet.
3, It's had a nice healthy advance.
Youve got to be kidding ? the GFC is and hasnt yet been what I would call a 'depression' in Aus. Let alone in history.
In 1980 the line went straight up. No bubble yet.
Hello and welcome to Aussie Stock Forums!
To gain full access you must register. Registration is free and takes only a few seconds to complete.
Already a member? Log in here.