Hello kennas,kennas said:Hi Mag, I'm good thanks!
How are you?
The above comments were really made in regard to particular people claiming 'this stock will go to 20 cents by Friday!!!' when it's sitting on 5 on Wednesday...
I must say I am a sceptic. It seems convenient for EW/time based practitioners to just use certain stock charts that do fit in to the theory but then ignore the rest. I would like to know what % of stocks actually do follow EW or cycles. I would hazzard a guess to say very few.
I would also like to compare ALL of Yogi's predictions to see what % actually make it? I hazzard a guess not many. I know Gann's a different game, and I'm not comparing it directly with wave theories, but I just raise that as another example of certain practitioners clinging on to the few examples that fit the profile and disregarding the multitute.
I'm still trying to fit the XAO into an EW count and it's impossible. This to me would tend to suggest that as the XAO is a summary of many stocks, and it can't fit, then it doesn't work.
So, I'm sticking to probabilities on basic charting for the minute. Until I see the light!
Hey, I’m great thanks. Still waiting to see if there is a Melbourne get together mark II, but hopefully you won’t be left high and dry this time!
Ok, I can see you’re a sceptic, and I recognise this, because so am I. But I spent years researching this stuff and found people who know a lot about it. In fact I had a couple of study groups for a few years which really helped.
Sure, any market analysis is necessarily flawed, and as Mark Douglas says “anything can happen”, and “every moment in the market is unique”.
Check out the demonstration in the “Improving chart analysis” thread on Brent and light crude for an example of how this time cycle approach can work. This is actually a Gann based time cycle approach, but I certainly pay a lot of attention to wave structure as an element in the mix, but it is pattern that is paramount.
As for EW – what kind of study have you done? wavepicker is probably the most knowledgeable and advanced EW player I know, and the process is quite involved, and takes years to master (as does the Gann method). The EW style is actually very effective but in the right circumstances. Sometimes it is irrelevant or just not applicable – same for time cycles. The art is in knowing how to use these to trade. Prechter and Frost’s work is about the best I’ve seen.
Just because you can’t see the patterns and understand them, doesn’t mean they aren’t there. And sure, many apparent patterns will not work out… But the concept is to deal in probabilities and pattern recognition just like any good T/A is all about.
Go and have a look at wavepicker’s forecast, and see if you agree that it’s pretty close to what happened. Forecasting is an art. Of course the practitioner will get it wrong sometimes, and should set criteria in place to identify when this happens invalidating the pattern, and take the appropriate action. But when these are right, do the math. Imagine having a forecast well in advance and being able to trade it successfully. Imagine trading that with leverage, and you’ll get the idea of the possibilities.
Regards
Magdoran