- Joined
- 17 January 2007
- Posts
- 2,986
- Reactions
- 32
descending wedge intact still, still to test lower lows??
WP, what is your view on the descending wedge formation, and the usually accepted outcome from such formations ie a break up & out?looks like this might just be the start of the acceleration phase down? Looked like a pretty weak rally from day 1 (as expected "a bounce"). IMO a very tough next few months coming up for the precious metals.
We have heard many times before the "the long term fundementals are intact" and the "the dollar is doomed". The reply to these comments has been: Trade what you see, not what you expect or hope for.
WP, what is your view on the descending wedge formation, and the usually accepted outcome from such formations ie a break up & out?
This is a 'slow' period of the year for gold as well so most don't expect too much anyway, unless of course we get the resumption of the 'correction' in general equities, which is looking a possibility by the action in the FTSE tonight, and would tie in with the ascending wedges I see for the DOW & FTSE.
I am patiently waiting in cash for the fall in gold shares too (watching LGL & SBM get into oversold), then the real action begins!
Anyone got an explanation to what happened in the white circled area? Big sell off then big buying again, makes no sense?
View attachment 20834
My view is unchanged, BEARISH. With a low expected betwen 541.90 and 730.20. This is the span of the previous 4th wave of one less degree, a common area of support. This is not a certainty only a guideline. Also statistically speaking cycle wave 2's which is what IMO is being traced out at present, usually find support at approx 38.2-50% of the entire impulse advance from 1999 to this year. 38.2% coincides with approx $730 and 50% with $650 which is where I would be looking specifically. The 50% mark is the one I favour.
Bet to keep your cash in favour of gold bars at this juncture IMO.
Well I THINK you will be proven wrong.
On 25/04/1980 gold closed at its high back then at US$850. It breached this level at the close of 2007. It proved to be a support in late Jan this year and again 8 trading days ago. It bounced off that area again last night. This level SHOULD hold now.
It's called manipulation.
It's the usual "8 or less" traders massively shorting contracts to depress the gold/silver price. They have been doing it for many years and almost always do it at around 9-10am in New York time. Apparently, this is the time when volumn is usually low and thus, allow them to move the price that much.
Nothing unusual given the same pattern has been going on for years and years. One can even trade this particular pattern!
It's called manipulation.
It's the usual "8 or less" traders massively shorting contracts to depress the gold/silver price. They have been doing it for many years and almost always do it at around 9-10am in New York time. Apparently, this is the time when volumn is usually low and thus, allow them to move the price that much.
Nothing unusual given the same pattern has been going on for years and years. One can even trade this particular pattern!
Yeh, spot on, 9am NY time and they are into it again.
If ya going to sprout the conspiracy at least try to link it to some basic facts. Its not 9 am in New York until 11 pm Sydney time!
And for your benefit I have pointed to the 9 - 10 am NY time period on the chart to show your low volume manipulation is actual the TWO HIGHEST volume hours of the day. In fact that two hour period counts for about 80% of the contracts traded.
And as for the 8 high volume "manipulators" that is a feature of all markets a small amount of parties trade 80% of the volume. Ain't nothing unusual in that.
If ya going to sprout the conspiracy at least try to link it to some basic facts. Its not 9 am in New York until 11 pm Sydney time!
And for your benefit I have pointed to the 9 - 10 am NY time period on the chart to show your low volume manipulation is actual the TWO HIGHEST volume hours of the day. In fact that two hour period counts for about 80% of the contracts traded.
And as for the 8 high volume "manipulators" that is a feature of all markets a small amount of parties trade 80% of the volume. Ain't nothing unusual in that.
I need to dig out the articles again. But from what I have read so far, the
Carters always do it at that particular time because the market is "low on volume" (or activities) from other players who are on the opposite side.
And obviously, to move the price at such a magnitude, you can't do it without significant volume.
Butlet is easily the most well outspoken guy who have been voicing against the manipulations. Somewhere in his archives you will find out more about the 9-10am sell pattern. http://www.investmentrarities.com/tb-archives.html
Ed Steer from Casey Research also mentioned the manipulations in his daily resource newsletter. http://caseyresearch.com/archives.php?pubId=8
A random article, http://www.marketwatch.com/news/stor...D170ED0B224}.
eCOT report for gold/silver obviously indicate that these "8 or less" traders are holding 80%+ of the short contracts. And has stepped up the concentration ever since gold was in bull market.
Why would these traders, or rather, the central banks and investment banks, are holding such a massive concentration of shorts?
Tell me which markets have only 8 or less traders that control 80% of the volume?
comments
Another funny thing is that the exchange imposed a position limit of 1500 contracts per trade on the long side only. But the limit for short contracts is essentially unlimited. Why set up such a restriction? Yes, this is pure fact as well, go and ask the exchange.
However, the pattern have continued to exist for quite some time now.
Whether you view this as an opportunity for a trade or not, it's up to you.
The gold/silver manipulation theory is quite extensive not to mention being quite sensitive as well. It would take more than several posts just to answer your questions. I don't claim to know EVERYTHING about the theory nor do i have any real hard evidences that the manipulations are real.
However, the facts remain that the "8 or less" traders in the COT are holding 83% (latest figures) of the silver shorts. That's over 50,000 contracts or over 200 days worth of global production. These are pure numbers taken from the COT report. You asked how come they could hold so many contracts and not blown out of the water yet when the silver prices ran a lot higher several weeks ago? Good question, but I have no idea. The central banks and investment banks have been doing it and they are still definitely in the water. That's billion of dollar on paper lost. Is it logical? Not really, it doesn't make sense to me either but it is still a fact.
Another funny thing is that the exchange imposed a position limit of 1500 contracts per trade on the long side only. But the limit for short contracts is essentially unlimited. Why set up such a restriction? Yes, this is pure fact as well, go and ask the exchange.
Had you considered that the market for Silver and gold isn't just a place for speculators Temjin?
That $850 is definitely a super strong support level. It almost coincidence with the daily 200 MA as well. That's a lot of confluence here.
It would be a massive psychological impact if that level is breached. I am sure the Cartels are aiming for it but it seem there are tons of buyers set at that point to buy back in as soon as it dips to that level.
Will have to wait and see who will win the day.
Obviously, the commercial producers/users will use future contracts to hedge themselves against price risks. Now have you considered that every posters in this thread is technically a speculator? I don't get what you are trying to imply here.
However, the facts remain that the "8 or less" traders in the COT are holding 83% (latest figures) of the silver shorts.
how come they could hold so many contracts and not blown out of the water yet when the silver prices ran a lot higher several weeks ago?
Another funny thing is that the exchange imposed a position limit of 1500 contracts per trade on the long side only. But the limit for short contracts is essentially unlimited. Why set up such a restriction?
Hello and welcome to Aussie Stock Forums!
To gain full access you must register. Registration is free and takes only a few seconds to complete.
Already a member? Log in here.