>Apocalypto<
20.03.2012
- Joined
- 2 February 2007
- Posts
- 2,233
- Reactions
- 2
Not sure what you may mean by that. I am only trying to put a point of view across that I believe in an earnest manner. Unlike the Wall Street spin doctors feeding crap to the sheeple on which they unload.
That facts of US insolvency are readily available, no big deal, they have just been spending beyond their means for many years and the debt collector is finally screwing things down. And a hard look at out own ballance of payments and trade says we are in for some shocks too. Lucky to have our big resources pit to offset to some degree but the downturn in the US will impact on that for awhile too.
Yep, and I am long gold for the long term. But short term, who knows IMHO
Not a really helpful post.What i mean is there are so many of u report experts on here now. You all know more about the US economy then the Americans. I know I am sounding harsh but I am getting sick of it. Maybe you should all go to the states and show em how to run the worlds largest economy.
What i mean is there are so many of u report experts on here now. You all know more about the US economy then the Americans. I know I am sounding harsh but I am getting sick of it. Maybe you should all go to the states and show em how to run the worlds largest economy.
So you know it's a bull market but u have no idea on what's doing on the short term. so how will u know when it's not a bull market. that is some crazy thing to say! the new bear market will start intraday then daily then weekly then monthly. so like i said in past post when will u know to get out? when the fundamentals change? by that time you would have lost more then 50% of your profits.
Not a really helpful post.
Mate, there are different imperatives for the observer/trader to the political economists.
The political economists are interested in propping up the economy in order to retain power.
The trader/observer knows when an economy needs some bitter medicine the former don't want to face.
If you would read the writings of most neutral American economists, you would see they pretty much dovetail with the views expressed here.
If you have an opposing view, backed up by analysis and logic, lay it out instead of nitpicking.
points taken Wayne,
But i am still quite fed up with all the so called US experts in here chucking around a couple reports and calling it fact. I am entitled to my own opinion, this is a public forum like you once told me.
Cheers
Of course, but you want your opinion yet seek to stifle someone else's. Do you see the duplicity in that? And you haven't actually expressed any opinion, apart from criticizing anothers.points taken Wayne,
But i am still quite fed up with all the so called US experts in here chucking around a couple reports and calling it fact. I am entitled to my own opinion, this is a public forum like you once told me.
Cheers
Of course, but you want your opinion yet seek to stifle someone else's. Do you see the duplicity in that? And you haven't actually expressed any opinion, apart from criticizing anothers.
Also, the forum exists at the largess of the domain owner. He has built a really good community here by having a few rules in place. Opinion is to be backed by some sort of analysis, otherwise we end up like HC.
Cheers
Couple of reports, in the last four years I have read and reread no less than nine books from US authors on their economic situation.
. Opinion is to be backed by some sort of analysis, otherwise we end up like HC.
Cheers
Let's see some analysis from you then. If you disagree with the general view of those here, I am sure there are plenty who would like to hear it.I don't see much analysis backing up opinions on this thread of late. Just cutting and pasting or repetition of other "gurus" opinions, to justify their own decisions and opinions. That's why this thread is of little interest to some posters. Just telling it how I see it.
Totally agree with Apocalyto's observation here
Cheers
Let's see some analysis from you then. If you disagree with the general view of those here, I am sure there are plenty who would like to hear it.
I don't see much analysis backing up opinions on this thread of late. Just cutting and pasting or repetition of other "gurus" opinions, to justify their own decisions and opinions. That's why this thread is of little interest to some posters. Just telling it how I see it.
Totally agree with Apocalyto's observation here
Cheers
I think your observation a bit unfair, afterall ASF is first and formost a discussion, not high tech analysis. I am sure there are many,other threads of little interest to many as well.
We are not islands, it is from others and the interactions taking place that we learn, picking up bits from others (gurus) gives fresh input.
It is really a gold bugs thread after all and greed driven to a great extent. My Great Grandfather and two of his brothers came from England for the gold rush, so a bit in my blood too.
Most of the posters on this thread are sincerly trying to contribute something for mutual benefit. You have the background and expertise to do so too Wavepicker.
Good for u explod. I hope you got a lot out of it.
What i would really like to know is if u have no idea about short term movements then how do u know if the market has turned or not? If u can gauge supply and demand in a way, ok like Jim Rogers can, what would be some examples of signs?
My report banter was just from my personal dislike for them.
Cheers
There are two keys:Wasn't just refering to TA explod. Some of the fundemental analysis posts from the likes of Ducati and Rederob used to make a few years back, to support their views was very informative,excellent, and original .
If I had to bet which was more likely to be around in 2000 years - the social acceptance of gold as a valuable good, vs, the social acceptance of the USD as a valuable good (and the US nation even existing), I know which one I'd back.
There are two keys:
First, the direction.
Second, that you picked it.
Investing in the debate might be intellectually stimulating, but investing money is really what it's about.
As I invest long term, the short term direction of the market is not at issue.
I have pared my portfolio to 30 equities and 10 have some exposure to gold (3 are pure gold plays).
Recent years have been more conducive to gold increasing in price than vice versa.
Much is due to gold being priced in USD terms and, for the many reasons cut and pasted into this thread, there is general acceptance that the US economy is not in good shape.
Keeping this post brief, if you feel the US economy is levelling off and about to head firmly north again, get out of gold now (or short it to the bejeebers).
I personally can't see the US market back on an even keel within 12 months, perhaps 2 years.
But the US market is just one of dozens of gold price drivers, so even when the US economy is back on its feet, it doesn't mean you dump gold. It does mean you should seriously evaluate why you still hold it.
Wavepicker and I do not agree on a number of market trends, and arguing the toss solves nothing.
Give it time.
Rederob, my comments were not in refernece to Gold, the US economy or the USD. Although I disagree with you on all the counts you mentioned except that on the US economy, my point was that at least you argue your points much more cosntructively than what I have seen here. Not just a couple of cheap comments thrown in hereor there.
Just getting back to the subject of Gold and the USD, you have no idea what I am all about, how I trade. In the months and years ahead you will see that my remarks will be proven correct and as such you will have to revisist your analysis. BTW I am, short Gold for the short term at least.
Good Trading.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?