This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

For those banned as rumor producer

Jump to new
T

ta2693

Joined
17 April 2007
Posts
539
Reactions
0
There are some ppl in this forum who banned as rumor producer. It was said they are made claim without solid evidence. But the following market movement prove they are right. Should we say sorry to them and allow them come back?

I think they are innocent by telling us what happen in market and because the following marketing behavior support their claim, I doubt their claim should be categorized as rumor. They are more likely to have better information source.
Those ppl should be welcomed by us.
 
Re: For those was banned as rumor producer

I'm not quite sure what you are referring to.

Nobody has ever been banned from ASF for posting a rumour.

Reprimanded, yes. Had a post removed, yes. But banned, no.

However, I stand by our policy of not allowing people to post any information they claim or imply is privileged.
 
Re: For those was banned as rumor producer

I heard a Rumor, that there was...... a 'Rumor'
 
exerpt from

http://www.aar.com.au/pubs/ldr/foclsep06.htm

hmmm perhaps if there isnt maybe there should be a 'market rumours' thread (aka HC) where we could track some history to rumour.


Conclusion
In a 'postscript' to the judgment, Master Sanderson notes that 'in an area of the market where rumour is rife, material information must be disclosed' and that if there is any doubt about whether or not information is material, the company ought to err on the side of caution. Therefore, from the dual perspective of ensuring compliance with the continuous disclosure requirements of the Act, and minimising litigation risk from shareholders, companies that operate in speculative industries (such as mining, medical research and pharmaceutical industries) may need to be particularly cautious when considering whether or not to disclose information to the market.

While Jubilee Mines was decided on an earlier manifestation of the current disclosure provisions of the Act, Mr Riley's success is likely to encourage shareholders (or, following the recent encouragement by the High Court of litigation funding, groups of shareholders) to bring claims to similar effect under the current provisions of the Act.
 
ta2693 said:
There are some ppl in this forum who banned as rumor producer.
Click to expand...
How about giving us some examples? Making statements like these without any sort of substantiation should be banned :
 
perhapes you would like to share this "rumour" with the rest of us unenlightened people
 
KIWIKARLOS said:
perhapes you would like to share this "rumour" with the rest of us unenlightened people
Click to expand...

There's a rumour going around that rumourmongerers are starting threads accusing ASF of banning rumourmongerers.

Hold on...that's not a rumour

Funny word when you think about it...."rumour". I don't think I know what it means anymore.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

As we age, hold more shares?
6 7 8
Replies
147
Views
9K
qldfrog
February 2025
2
Replies
29
Views
2K
ducati916
April 2024 DDD
3 4 5
Replies
98
Views
9K
ducati916
Battery technologies for a fast charging and changing world
2 3
Replies
49
Views
8K
Garpal Gumnut
DrBourse TA Help for Beginners
14 15 16
Replies
319
Views
66K
farmerge
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more...